Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2016 · 66th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 172

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2016, Page 172

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 front matter 19 front matter 20 front matter 21 front matter 22 front matter 23 front matter 24 front matter 25 front matter 26 front matter 27 front matter 28 front matter 29 front matter 30 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Page 395 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Page 399 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Page 410 Page 411 Page 412 Page 413 Page 414 Page 415 Page 416 Page 417 Page 418 Page 419 Page 420 Page 421 Page 422 Page 423 Page 424 Page 425 Page 426 Page 427 Page 428 Page 429 Page 430 Page 431 Page 432 Page 433 Page 434 Page 435 Page 436 Page 437 Page 438 Page 439 Page 440 Page 441 Page 442 Page 443 Page 444 Page 445 Page 446 Page 447 Page 448 Page 449 Page 450 Page 451 Page 452 Page 453 Page 454 Page 455 Page 456 Page 457 Page 458 Page 459 Page 460 Page 461 Page 462 Page 463 Page 464 Page 465 Page 466 Page 467 Page 468 Page 469 Page 470 Page 471 Page 472 Page 473 Page 474 Page 475 Page 476 Page 477 Page 478 Page 479

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

172

IV. THEOLOGICAL DOCUMENTS­­—COMMISSION ON THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS

Gender Identity Disorder or Gender Dysphoria
in Christian Perspective1
“Gender” has become a matter of uncertainty. Rather than male or female, many see gender as a
relative matter, or even a continuum. They consider gender or sexual identity to be less a reality
given at conception than a matter of personal discovery.2 Reflective of such a theoretical
perspective, increasing attention is also given to individuals who are personally uncertain about
their own gender or sexual identity—in particular, individuals who are “transsexual” or
“transgendered,” 3 as well as those who identify themselves as “bisexual” or are “questioning”
their gender and in the process of determining what they perceive to be their true gender
identity.4
In recent years the Commission on Theology and Church Relations has been asked about the
specific matter of transsexual or transgendered individuals. Questions have come from
individuals with personal questions about sexual identity including persons who are uncertain
whether they are “truly” male or female, others who are regularly dressing and presenting
themselves as a member of the opposite sex, and still others who are participating in hormonal or
surgical procedures to change their sex identification from male to female or from female to
male. In addition to concerns from individuals questioning their sexual identity, church workers
have asked for guidance in pastoral care for individuals struggling with matters of gender
identity.
The following pages will consider, first, some of the current psychotherapeutic perspectives of
the American Psychiatric Association. Those perspectives are important, yet Christian churches
seek a theological understanding as grounded in the higher authority of God’s revelation in
Scripture. Thus the remainder of the report provides theological reflection on the topic of sexual
identity and suggestions for pastoral care.

Psychotherapeutic Considerations
The American Psychiatric Association’s (APA) 1994 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM-IV) listed four criteria required for a person to be diagnosed
with gender identity disorder (i.e., as a transsexual or transgendered individual):
 Strong and persistent cross-gender identification;
 Persistent discomfort about one's assigned sex or a sense of inappropriateness in the
gender-role of that sex;
 The individual does not have a concurrent physical intersex condition
[hermaphroditism5];
 Clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important
areas of functioning.6
In recent years, these criteria and the APA’s 1994 categorization of the condition as a “disorder”
have stirred controversy within the psychotherapeutic community together with impassioned
debate. The primary concern that many have had with DSM-IV has been the assumption that
identifying with a gender other than the one assigned at birth is a “disorder.” The label
“disorder” is thought to imply a value judgment. For example, the doctor who chaired the gender
identity disorder committee of the APA has been criticized by many because he advocates
cognitive behavioral treatment for the disorder in children (although he does not advocate such
treatment for adults).7
As a result of the debate the most recent edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-58), released in May of 2013, discontinued the term “gender
identity disorder” in favor of “gender dysphoria.” 9 DSM-5 distinguishes between gender
dysphoria in children and adults. It defines “transgender” persons as those “who transiently or
persistently identify with a gender different from their natal gender” and “transsexual” persons as
those who either seek or have undergone “a social transition from male to female or female to
male” whether or not that entails hormonal or surgical treatments.10 DSM-5 continues to
maintain a distinction between sexual dysphoria and an intersex condition (in which an
individual has physically or genetically ambiguous sexual traits). “Overall, current evidence is
5

As Lutheran Christians, a consideration of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod on this and any topic is
grounded in belief in the full authority of Holy Scripture as God’s infallible Word and the conviction that the
Confessions of the Lutheran Church are a truthful interpretation of the Scriptures. The general perspective of this
report, however, is one that is not simply that of the Lutheran theological tradition, but rather stands within the broad
(catholic) consensus of traditional Christian teaching.
2
This is an element of what is sometimes referred to in gender studies as the “social constructionism” movement in
psychological theory. As an example, see Rachel Alsop, et al., Theorizing Gender: An Introduction (Malden,
Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers, 2002).
3
For the purposes of this document, the definitions of transsexual and transgender used by the American Psychiatric
Association are utilized. See the text below under Psychotherapeutic Considerations for those definitions (p. 2).
4
Note the familiar acronym LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgendered) to which is now frequently added Q for
Questioning—LGBTQ. Both acronyms are regularly present not only in secular discussions, but also in ecclesial
settings. Ecclesial LGBT(Q) lobbies have pressed church bodies to make changes allowing ordination into the
ministry and religious blessing of same-sex unions or marriages of practicing homosexual persons. Such lobbies are
also advocates for Bisexual and Transgendered individuals and others who are Questioning their sexual identity.

A hermaphrodite is a person having both male and female sexual tissues. It is an older term for a condition now
included under the term “intersex” which is defined in the body of this section or described by the phrase “disorder
of sex development” (DSD).
DSM-IV (Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994) 537-538.
7
Dr. Kenneth Zucker is a sexologist who specializes in the care of children with gender dysphoria. He favors
cognitive behavioral therapy only in children and disavows reparative therapy for homosexuals. “Kenneth Zucker.”
Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_Zucker> (accessed: 29 October 2013).
Cognitive behavioral therapy in this context may be generally defined as a therapeutic process that attempts to help
an individuals change their sexual identity. In this case, Zucker’s approach seeks to help children who are
identifying with the opposite sex to be accepting of their own sex as a boy or girl.
8
DSM-IV and predecessor editions were identified by Roman numerals when abbreviated. DSM-5 uses the Arabic
numeral.
9
DSM-5 (Arlington, Virginia: American Psychiatric Association, 2013), 451-459. Dysphoria is medically defined as
“an emotional state marked by anxiety, depression, and restlessness” (dysphoria. Dictionary.com. The American
Heritage® Stedman's Medical Dictionary. Houghton Mifflin Company.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/dysphoria [accessed: 29 October 2013]).
10
DSM-5, 451.

1

2

1

insufficient to label gender dysphoria without a disorder of sex development as a form of
intersexuality limited to the central nervous system.”11
Gender dysphoria in both children and adults is reportedly more prevalent in males than in
females. For adults identified as male at birth, the incidence reported in DSM-5 is between
0.005% to 0.014% (5-14 cases in every 100,000 males). For adults identified as female at birth,
the rate is from 0.002-0.003% (2-3 cases in every 100,000 females). No global prevalence data is
offered for gender dysphoria in children, but the ratio from many international studies again
suggests a greater rate of occurrence in boys compared to girls (between 2 and 4.5 times as often
for boys as for girls). In a final note on prevalence, however, DSM-5 indicates that Japan and
Poland report more sexual dysphoria in females than in males.12 (No further information on any
of the data is given and DSM-5 does not indicate either the sources of the research or its sample
populations.)
In an online pamphlet released in advance of DSM-5, gender dysphoria is described as follows:
For a person to be diagnosed with gender dysphoria, there must be a marked
difference between the individual’s expressed/experienced gender and the gender others
would assign him or her, and it must continue for at least six months. In children, the
desire to be of the other gender must be present and verbalized. This condition causes
clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important
areas of functioning.
Gender dysphoria is manifested in a variety of ways, including strong desires to
be treated as the other gender or to be rid of one’s sex characteristics, or a strong
conviction that one has feelings and reactions typical of the other gender.13
DSM-5 itself states: “Gender dysphoria refers to the distress that may accompany the
incongruence between one’s experienced or expressed gender and one’s assigned gender.” It
furthermore indicates that “[t]he current term is more descriptive than the previous DSM-IV term
gender identity disorder and focuses on dysphoria as the clinical problem, not identity per se.”14
In taking this stance, the APA is acknowledging both the afore-mentioned debate and also the
complexity of the research that has been conducted in this area. While an intersex condition (see
below) is rather distinctive and clearly involves biological and genetic criteria, the causes of
individual distress over one’s apparent sex—one’s “natal gender”15—are highly complex. There
is no certain physiological or genetic cause for such dysphoria.

11
DSM-5, 457. In other words, there is insufficient evidence to suggest that gender dysphoria has a biological cause
unless it is accompanied by sexual ambiguity of a physical nature (intersex condition or DSD). DSM-5 cites
evidence that hormonal levels for natal males with sexual dysphoria are similar to those for the male population
without sexual dysphoria. Hormonal levels for natal females with sexual dysphoria indicate a slightly higher, but
statistically insignificant, level of testosterone than found in the average female population.
12
DSM-5, 454.
13
See http://www.dsm5.org/Documents/Gender%20Dysphoria%20Fact%20Sheet.pdf (accessed 29 Oct. 2013).
14
DSM-5, 451; emphases in the original.
15
The term “natal gender” is used and defined in DSM-5, 451 as the identity associated with biological indicators
that is given to an individual at birth.

3

2016 Convention Workbook

6

The change in terminology from DSM-IV to DSM-5 is significant because it indicates a
reluctance to identify the confusion that an individual may feel about whether he or she is male
or female, despite his or her natal gender, as a clinical problem. Rather than an identity disorder,
DSM-5 only recognizes the distress the individual feels as a treatable problem. This suggests that
the debate with its consequent conceptual and terminological changes has occurred in large
measure because a value judgment is perceived to be at the heart of the notion that cross-gender
identification is itself a “disorder” and therefore detrimental or negative.
Viewing sexual identity from a perspective of ordered or disordered implies a moral judgment,
with “good” versus “bad” implied. Such moral reflection has been progressively excluded from
the fields of psychology and psychiatry in recent decades. The elimination of homosexuality
from the list of psychiatric disorders on December 15, 1973 is a relevant example. That
elimination was grounded primarily in the conviction that it was a moral value judgment to
declare homosexuality a psychiatric disorder that should be treated.
The continuing debate regarding homosexual conduct in the United States is in large measure a
debate between a biblical and traditionally Christian understanding of the moral quality of
homosexual behavior and the understanding, adopted by an increasing percentage of those in the
psychiatric community since 1973, that homosexuality is either a natural condition or a valid
lifestyle alternative. The underlying question is whether there is space for moral judgment in
determining human behavior that requires psychiatric or psychological therapeutic care. The
trajectory of past thinking and current DSM judgments indicates a similar perspective about
matters of gender identity, namely, that such dysphoria should not be viewed in any way that
involves moral judgment. The APA therefore approaches such an issue from a significantly
different standpoint than the standpoint of Christian theology.

Christian Moral Reflection on Gender Identity
Christian theological and moral reflection on matters of gender identity must note the trajectory
indicated above and its basis in the 1973 decision of the APA. An underlying assumption of
those who press for changes in the church’s understanding of homosexual behavior has been that
one’s embodiment should not be a determinative factor in moral behavior. In other words, simply
because one is physically male, he should not have to accept that the natural and God-pleasing
sexual expression appropriate to him should be toward females. And, if one is physically female,
she should not feel morally compelled to restrict any sexual desires for women. Similarly, one
who has sexual desire for both men and women, should not seek to deny such desires or feel
compelled to restrict his or her sexual contact only to the opposite sex. And, lastly, just because
one has male genitalia, one should not be encouraged to seek treatment for the fact that one feels
more like a female.
The entire Christian tradition and the majority of Christian churches today have opposed such
changes in perspective. The basis for such opposition is precisely because our embodiment is
understood as an aspect of our creation by God and therefore instructive regarding behavior that
is good and pleasing to Him. Human embodiment indicates simply and eloquently God’s
4