Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2016 · 66th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 172
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2016, Page 172
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
front matter 19
front matter 20
front matter 21
front matter 22
front matter 23
front matter 24
front matter 25
front matter 26
front matter 27
front matter 28
front matter 29
front matter 30
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Page 395
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Page 399
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Page 410
Page 411
Page 412
Page 413
Page 414
Page 415
Page 416
Page 417
Page 418
Page 419
Page 420
Page 421
Page 422
Page 423
Page 424
Page 425
Page 426
Page 427
Page 428
Page 429
Page 430
Page 431
Page 432
Page 433
Page 434
Page 435
Page 436
Page 437
Page 438
Page 439
Page 440
Page 441
Page 442
Page 443
Page 444
Page 445
Page 446
Page 447
Page 448
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 452
Page 453
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Page 458
Page 459
Page 460
Page 461
Page 462
Page 463
Page 464
Page 465
Page 466
Page 467
Page 468
Page 469
Page 470
Page 471
Page 472
Page 473
Page 474
Page 475
Page 476
Page 477
Page 478
Page 479
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
172
IV. THEOLOGICAL DOCUMENTS—COMMISSION ON THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS
Gender Identity Disorder or Gender Dysphoria
in Christian Perspective1
“Gender” has become a matter of uncertainty. Rather than male or female, many see gender as a
relative matter, or even a continuum. They consider gender or sexual identity to be less a reality
given at conception than a matter of personal discovery.2 Reflective of such a theoretical
perspective, increasing attention is also given to individuals who are personally uncertain about
their own gender or sexual identity—in particular, individuals who are “transsexual” or
“transgendered,” 3 as well as those who identify themselves as “bisexual” or are “questioning”
their gender and in the process of determining what they perceive to be their true gender
identity.4
In recent years the Commission on Theology and Church Relations has been asked about the
specific matter of transsexual or transgendered individuals. Questions have come from
individuals with personal questions about sexual identity including persons who are uncertain
whether they are “truly” male or female, others who are regularly dressing and presenting
themselves as a member of the opposite sex, and still others who are participating in hormonal or
surgical procedures to change their sex identification from male to female or from female to
male. In addition to concerns from individuals questioning their sexual identity, church workers
have asked for guidance in pastoral care for individuals struggling with matters of gender
identity.
The following pages will consider, first, some of the current psychotherapeutic perspectives of
the American Psychiatric Association. Those perspectives are important, yet Christian churches
seek a theological understanding as grounded in the higher authority of God’s revelation in
Scripture. Thus the remainder of the report provides theological reflection on the topic of sexual
identity and suggestions for pastoral care.
Psychotherapeutic Considerations
The American Psychiatric Association’s (APA) 1994 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM-IV) listed four criteria required for a person to be diagnosed
with gender identity disorder (i.e., as a transsexual or transgendered individual):
Strong and persistent cross-gender identification;
Persistent discomfort about one's assigned sex or a sense of inappropriateness in the
gender-role of that sex;
The individual does not have a concurrent physical intersex condition
[hermaphroditism5];
Clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important
areas of functioning.6
In recent years, these criteria and the APA’s 1994 categorization of the condition as a “disorder”
have stirred controversy within the psychotherapeutic community together with impassioned
debate. The primary concern that many have had with DSM-IV has been the assumption that
identifying with a gender other than the one assigned at birth is a “disorder.” The label
“disorder” is thought to imply a value judgment. For example, the doctor who chaired the gender
identity disorder committee of the APA has been criticized by many because he advocates
cognitive behavioral treatment for the disorder in children (although he does not advocate such
treatment for adults).7
As a result of the debate the most recent edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-58), released in May of 2013, discontinued the term “gender
identity disorder” in favor of “gender dysphoria.” 9 DSM-5 distinguishes between gender
dysphoria in children and adults. It defines “transgender” persons as those “who transiently or
persistently identify with a gender different from their natal gender” and “transsexual” persons as
those who either seek or have undergone “a social transition from male to female or female to
male” whether or not that entails hormonal or surgical treatments.10 DSM-5 continues to
maintain a distinction between sexual dysphoria and an intersex condition (in which an
individual has physically or genetically ambiguous sexual traits). “Overall, current evidence is
5
As Lutheran Christians, a consideration of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod on this and any topic is
grounded in belief in the full authority of Holy Scripture as God’s infallible Word and the conviction that the
Confessions of the Lutheran Church are a truthful interpretation of the Scriptures. The general perspective of this
report, however, is one that is not simply that of the Lutheran theological tradition, but rather stands within the broad
(catholic) consensus of traditional Christian teaching.
2
This is an element of what is sometimes referred to in gender studies as the “social constructionism” movement in
psychological theory. As an example, see Rachel Alsop, et al., Theorizing Gender: An Introduction (Malden,
Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers, 2002).
3
For the purposes of this document, the definitions of transsexual and transgender used by the American Psychiatric
Association are utilized. See the text below under Psychotherapeutic Considerations for those definitions (p. 2).
4
Note the familiar acronym LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgendered) to which is now frequently added Q for
Questioning—LGBTQ. Both acronyms are regularly present not only in secular discussions, but also in ecclesial
settings. Ecclesial LGBT(Q) lobbies have pressed church bodies to make changes allowing ordination into the
ministry and religious blessing of same-sex unions or marriages of practicing homosexual persons. Such lobbies are
also advocates for Bisexual and Transgendered individuals and others who are Questioning their sexual identity.
A hermaphrodite is a person having both male and female sexual tissues. It is an older term for a condition now
included under the term “intersex” which is defined in the body of this section or described by the phrase “disorder
of sex development” (DSD).
DSM-IV (Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994) 537-538.
7
Dr. Kenneth Zucker is a sexologist who specializes in the care of children with gender dysphoria. He favors
cognitive behavioral therapy only in children and disavows reparative therapy for homosexuals. “Kenneth Zucker.”
Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_Zucker> (accessed: 29 October 2013).
Cognitive behavioral therapy in this context may be generally defined as a therapeutic process that attempts to help
an individuals change their sexual identity. In this case, Zucker’s approach seeks to help children who are
identifying with the opposite sex to be accepting of their own sex as a boy or girl.
8
DSM-IV and predecessor editions were identified by Roman numerals when abbreviated. DSM-5 uses the Arabic
numeral.
9
DSM-5 (Arlington, Virginia: American Psychiatric Association, 2013), 451-459. Dysphoria is medically defined as
“an emotional state marked by anxiety, depression, and restlessness” (dysphoria. Dictionary.com. The American
Heritage® Stedman's Medical Dictionary. Houghton Mifflin Company.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/dysphoria [accessed: 29 October 2013]).
10
DSM-5, 451.
1
2
1
insufficient to label gender dysphoria without a disorder of sex development as a form of
intersexuality limited to the central nervous system.”11
Gender dysphoria in both children and adults is reportedly more prevalent in males than in
females. For adults identified as male at birth, the incidence reported in DSM-5 is between
0.005% to 0.014% (5-14 cases in every 100,000 males). For adults identified as female at birth,
the rate is from 0.002-0.003% (2-3 cases in every 100,000 females). No global prevalence data is
offered for gender dysphoria in children, but the ratio from many international studies again
suggests a greater rate of occurrence in boys compared to girls (between 2 and 4.5 times as often
for boys as for girls). In a final note on prevalence, however, DSM-5 indicates that Japan and
Poland report more sexual dysphoria in females than in males.12 (No further information on any
of the data is given and DSM-5 does not indicate either the sources of the research or its sample
populations.)
In an online pamphlet released in advance of DSM-5, gender dysphoria is described as follows:
For a person to be diagnosed with gender dysphoria, there must be a marked
difference between the individual’s expressed/experienced gender and the gender others
would assign him or her, and it must continue for at least six months. In children, the
desire to be of the other gender must be present and verbalized. This condition causes
clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important
areas of functioning.
Gender dysphoria is manifested in a variety of ways, including strong desires to
be treated as the other gender or to be rid of one’s sex characteristics, or a strong
conviction that one has feelings and reactions typical of the other gender.13
DSM-5 itself states: “Gender dysphoria refers to the distress that may accompany the
incongruence between one’s experienced or expressed gender and one’s assigned gender.” It
furthermore indicates that “[t]he current term is more descriptive than the previous DSM-IV term
gender identity disorder and focuses on dysphoria as the clinical problem, not identity per se.”14
In taking this stance, the APA is acknowledging both the afore-mentioned debate and also the
complexity of the research that has been conducted in this area. While an intersex condition (see
below) is rather distinctive and clearly involves biological and genetic criteria, the causes of
individual distress over one’s apparent sex—one’s “natal gender”15—are highly complex. There
is no certain physiological or genetic cause for such dysphoria.
11
DSM-5, 457. In other words, there is insufficient evidence to suggest that gender dysphoria has a biological cause
unless it is accompanied by sexual ambiguity of a physical nature (intersex condition or DSD). DSM-5 cites
evidence that hormonal levels for natal males with sexual dysphoria are similar to those for the male population
without sexual dysphoria. Hormonal levels for natal females with sexual dysphoria indicate a slightly higher, but
statistically insignificant, level of testosterone than found in the average female population.
12
DSM-5, 454.
13
See http://www.dsm5.org/Documents/Gender%20Dysphoria%20Fact%20Sheet.pdf (accessed 29 Oct. 2013).
14
DSM-5, 451; emphases in the original.
15
The term “natal gender” is used and defined in DSM-5, 451 as the identity associated with biological indicators
that is given to an individual at birth.
3
2016 Convention Workbook
6
The change in terminology from DSM-IV to DSM-5 is significant because it indicates a
reluctance to identify the confusion that an individual may feel about whether he or she is male
or female, despite his or her natal gender, as a clinical problem. Rather than an identity disorder,
DSM-5 only recognizes the distress the individual feels as a treatable problem. This suggests that
the debate with its consequent conceptual and terminological changes has occurred in large
measure because a value judgment is perceived to be at the heart of the notion that cross-gender
identification is itself a “disorder” and therefore detrimental or negative.
Viewing sexual identity from a perspective of ordered or disordered implies a moral judgment,
with “good” versus “bad” implied. Such moral reflection has been progressively excluded from
the fields of psychology and psychiatry in recent decades. The elimination of homosexuality
from the list of psychiatric disorders on December 15, 1973 is a relevant example. That
elimination was grounded primarily in the conviction that it was a moral value judgment to
declare homosexuality a psychiatric disorder that should be treated.
The continuing debate regarding homosexual conduct in the United States is in large measure a
debate between a biblical and traditionally Christian understanding of the moral quality of
homosexual behavior and the understanding, adopted by an increasing percentage of those in the
psychiatric community since 1973, that homosexuality is either a natural condition or a valid
lifestyle alternative. The underlying question is whether there is space for moral judgment in
determining human behavior that requires psychiatric or psychological therapeutic care. The
trajectory of past thinking and current DSM judgments indicates a similar perspective about
matters of gender identity, namely, that such dysphoria should not be viewed in any way that
involves moral judgment. The APA therefore approaches such an issue from a significantly
different standpoint than the standpoint of Christian theology.
Christian Moral Reflection on Gender Identity
Christian theological and moral reflection on matters of gender identity must note the trajectory
indicated above and its basis in the 1973 decision of the APA. An underlying assumption of
those who press for changes in the church’s understanding of homosexual behavior has been that
one’s embodiment should not be a determinative factor in moral behavior. In other words, simply
because one is physically male, he should not have to accept that the natural and God-pleasing
sexual expression appropriate to him should be toward females. And, if one is physically female,
she should not feel morally compelled to restrict any sexual desires for women. Similarly, one
who has sexual desire for both men and women, should not seek to deny such desires or feel
compelled to restrict his or her sexual contact only to the opposite sex. And, lastly, just because
one has male genitalia, one should not be encouraged to seek treatment for the fact that one feels
more like a female.
The entire Christian tradition and the majority of Christian churches today have opposed such
changes in perspective. The basis for such opposition is precisely because our embodiment is
understood as an aspect of our creation by God and therefore instructive regarding behavior that
is good and pleasing to Him. Human embodiment indicates simply and eloquently God’s
4