Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2016 · 66th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 118
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2016, Page 118
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
front matter 19
front matter 20
front matter 21
front matter 22
front matter 23
front matter 24
front matter 25
front matter 26
front matter 27
front matter 28
front matter 29
front matter 30
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Page 395
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Page 399
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Page 410
Page 411
Page 412
Page 413
Page 414
Page 415
Page 416
Page 417
Page 418
Page 419
Page 420
Page 421
Page 422
Page 423
Page 424
Page 425
Page 426
Page 427
Page 428
Page 429
Page 430
Page 431
Page 432
Page 433
Page 434
Page 435
Page 436
Page 437
Page 438
Page 439
Page 440
Page 441
Page 442
Page 443
Page 444
Page 445
Page 446
Page 447
Page 448
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 452
Page 453
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Page 458
Page 459
Page 460
Page 461
Page 462
Page 463
Page 464
Page 465
Page 466
Page 467
Page 468
Page 469
Page 470
Page 471
Page 472
Page 473
Page 474
Page 475
Page 476
Page 477
Page 478
Page 479
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
118
OFFICER, BOARD, AND COMMISSION REPORTS
today and tomorrow Unfortunately, many of these servants find themselves released from their calls due to poorer financial circumstances
or weakened stability and health of congregations. Yet, we remain
grateful for their faithfulness in our midst.
During the last triennium, the Rocky Mountain District’s congregations had the blessed opportunity to support the Lutheran
Theological Seminary in Tshwane, South Africa, in various ways
through student tuition support and other seminary related operations;
the Lutheran Hispanic Missionary Institute (LHMI) and their efforts
training future Hispanic ministry leaders; the Biblical Orthodox
Lutheran Mission (BOLM) and their ministry to the Arabic-speaking
community; and Hispanic ministry throughout the district.
We celebrate the gift of Christ’s forgiveness in our troubled lives
as we reflect the Gospel in mercy by thought, word, and deed. We
pray with and for our brothers and sisters as we are able to reach out
to help and care. We work together, knowing we are together at the
foot of His cross. “Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own”
(Matt. 6:33). We rest upon this rock in all we do! Our Life Together in
the Rocky Mountain District is challenging and full of opportunities.
The greatest opportunity is the gathering of His people to hear His
Word and receive new life through Baptism and forgiveness through
His body and blood. Healthy church workers and congregations are
high priority for the district board of directors. Here is the place for
all to repent, confess, and rejoice in the promise of our Lord.
The future of the Rocky Mountain District’s Mercy, Witness and
Life Together continues to be carried out through the Gospel Gap—a
circuit-based mission model adopted by the 2012 district convention, only expanded much more. This mission model seeks to identify
where gaps exist whether they be geographic, demographic, relational, spiritual, or financial whereby in cooperation between the
circuit and the district these gaps can be closed, healed, grown, or
nurtured. The Gospel Gap places accountable stewarding of the triune God’s mission through cooperation of congregational, circuit,
and district levels.
The Gospel Gap we have in place fits nicely in the general principles for judging the viability of a district. The guidance and support
to member congregations is at the local, circuit, area, and district
levels. This is also demonstrated in the caring we all have and do
for one another. This has brought a large geographical district into
understanding we are together and made us “smaller.” We are always
evaluating and looking at the challenges for the congregations. Every
location is unique, so the Gospel Gap again works. We are seeing
more congregations struggling financially and especially smaller parishes who want their own pastor but lack the means to care for the
pastor. This is a trickle-down effect as it hits the parish, district, and
the Synod. The configuration of our district is manageable because
of how we are set up in the Gospel Gap, and that is always being
reviewed and challenged to make it better for all.
Allen Anderson, President
R46
SELC District
The year 2016 marks the 45th anniversary of the SELC as a nongeographical district of the LCMS. Following the breakup of the
Synodical Conference, the Synod of Evangelical Lutheran Churches
accepted the invitation to become a part of The Lutheran Church––
Missouri Synod. Since the early 1900s, the SELC has always been in
agreement with the LCMS in matters of faith and practice and continues this mutual agreement.
First, I would like to thank the two previous SELC District presidents for their faithful work on behalf of the Synod and the district.
2016 Convention Workbook
The Rev. Dr. Albert M. Marcis served as president from 1972 to 1997.
He has also continued to serve the LCMS in various other capacities.
The Rev. Dr. Carl H. Krueger Jr. served as president from 1997 to
2015, as well as serving in the military chaplaincy program. We thank
both for serving their Lord and church so faithfully.
The SELC continues to spread the Gospel through its mission
outreach, especially with satellite congregations in the Lake Mary
and Tampa, Florida, areas. Work in the Hispanic communities in
Chicago, Illinois, and Whiting, Indiana, continues with both a pastor and deaconess. Multicultural work continues in Toronto, Ontario,
and Montreal, Quebec.
The LWML of the SELC District was one of six districts that
hosted the 2013 LWML convention in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Our
LWML continues to support the work of our mission congregations
in our district and circuits.
The Lutheran Haven in Oviedo, Florida, has been our district
retirement facility since 1947. The Haven also includes nursing facilities and other special care units. Plans are being made to expand the
work. Many retired pastors and various district and Synod officers
have retired at our Lutheran Haven.
The Luther League is the youth organization of our SELC District,
dating back to 1927, when the first convention was held at St. Paul
Lutheran Church, Whiting, Indiana, which will host the 89th annual
convention in 2016. A goodly number of youth groups have also
attended the Synod gatherings.
Financially, the SELC District continues to rank in the top third
of contributions per communicant member for work at large, work at
home, and the Synod’s budget. With no district office building or paid
staff, the SELC continues to practice good stewardship in support of
the Synod, our two seminaries, and various other areas of district and
Synod life and ministry.
In addition to meeting in district conventions, the SELC District
as a whole meets for a district-wide convocation in non-convention
years, as well as each circuit meeting quarterly for two-day conferences sometimes followed with our district board of directors
meetings. As a lifelong member of the SELC, I can attest to the brotherly love of all of our pastors and church workers, and despite the
distances, we have a close relationship with all.
SELC District
Showing Everyone Life in Christ
Showing Everyone the Love of Christ.
Andrew J. Dzurovcik, President
R47
South Dakota District
Greetings to the Synod from the 30,000 baptized members in the
108 congregations of the South Dakota District! We are blessed to
walk together with you in serving our gracious God.
2013 Res. 7-04A requested our evaluation of district viability, and
the respondents to our request for such feedback, via the survey provided, were overwhelmingly positive in holding to the opinion that
the South Dakota District is indeed “viable.” The resources of the district are being used to support the congregations, schools, and other
ministries within our state; the district staff are attentive to the needs
of these ministries; and, above all, God’s precious Word is being
shared throughout the 77,000 square miles of the state, if not through
the physical presence of congregations (we have none in the extreme
northwest part of South Dakota), certainly through the televised worship service we broadcast every Sunday morning throughout the state
(called “Main Street Living”).
Yet, some weaknesses were identified by respondents to the viability survey. Some respondents felt that the district staff tend to be more