Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2016 · 66th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 118

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2016, Page 118

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 front matter 19 front matter 20 front matter 21 front matter 22 front matter 23 front matter 24 front matter 25 front matter 26 front matter 27 front matter 28 front matter 29 front matter 30 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Page 395 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Page 399 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Page 410 Page 411 Page 412 Page 413 Page 414 Page 415 Page 416 Page 417 Page 418 Page 419 Page 420 Page 421 Page 422 Page 423 Page 424 Page 425 Page 426 Page 427 Page 428 Page 429 Page 430 Page 431 Page 432 Page 433 Page 434 Page 435 Page 436 Page 437 Page 438 Page 439 Page 440 Page 441 Page 442 Page 443 Page 444 Page 445 Page 446 Page 447 Page 448 Page 449 Page 450 Page 451 Page 452 Page 453 Page 454 Page 455 Page 456 Page 457 Page 458 Page 459 Page 460 Page 461 Page 462 Page 463 Page 464 Page 465 Page 466 Page 467 Page 468 Page 469 Page 470 Page 471 Page 472 Page 473 Page 474 Page 475 Page 476 Page 477 Page 478 Page 479

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

118

OFFICER, BOARD, AND COMMISSION REPORTS

today and tomorrow Unfortunately, many of these servants find themselves released from their calls due to poorer financial circumstances
or weakened stability and health of congregations. Yet, we remain
grateful for their faithfulness in our midst.
During the last triennium, the Rocky Mountain District’s congregations had the blessed opportunity to support the Lutheran
Theological Seminary in Tshwane, South Africa, in various ways
through student tuition support and other seminary related operations;
the Lutheran Hispanic Missionary Institute (LHMI) and their efforts
training future Hispanic ministry leaders; the Biblical Orthodox
Lutheran Mission (BOLM) and their ministry to the Arabic-speaking
community; and Hispanic ministry throughout the district.
We celebrate the gift of Christ’s forgiveness in our troubled lives
as we reflect the Gospel in mercy by thought, word, and deed. We
pray with and for our brothers and sisters as we are able to reach out
to help and care. We work together, knowing we are together at the
foot of His cross. “Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own”
(Matt. 6:33). We rest upon this rock in all we do! Our Life Together in
the Rocky Mountain District is challenging and full of opportunities.
The greatest opportunity is the gathering of His people to hear His
Word and receive new life through Baptism and forgiveness through
His body and blood. Healthy church workers and congregations are
high priority for the district board of directors. Here is the place for
all to repent, confess, and rejoice in the promise of our Lord.
The future of the Rocky Mountain District’s Mercy, Witness and
Life Together continues to be carried out through the Gospel Gap—a
circuit-based mission model adopted by the 2012 district convention, only expanded much more. This mission model seeks to identify
where gaps exist whether they be geographic, demographic, relational, spiritual, or financial whereby in cooperation between the
circuit and the district these gaps can be closed, healed, grown, or
nurtured. The Gospel Gap places accountable stewarding of the triune God’s mission through cooperation of congregational, circuit,
and district levels.
The Gospel Gap we have in place fits nicely in the general principles for judging the viability of a district. The guidance and support
to member congregations is at the local, circuit, area, and district
levels. This is also demonstrated in the caring we all have and do
for one another. This has brought a large geographical district into
understanding we are together and made us “smaller.” We are always
evaluating and looking at the challenges for the congregations. Every
location is unique, so the Gospel Gap again works. We are seeing
more congregations struggling financially and especially smaller parishes who want their own pastor but lack the means to care for the
pastor. This is a trickle-down effect as it hits the parish, district, and
the Synod. The configuration of our district is manageable because
of how we are set up in the Gospel Gap, and that is always being
reviewed and challenged to make it better for all.
Allen Anderson, President
R46

SELC District
The year 2016 marks the 45th anniversary of the SELC as a nongeographical district of the LCMS. Following the breakup of the
Synodical Conference, the Synod of Evangelical Lutheran Churches
accepted the invitation to become a part of The Lutheran Church––
Missouri Synod. Since the early 1900s, the SELC has always been in
agreement with the LCMS in matters of faith and practice and continues this mutual agreement.
First, I would like to thank the two previous SELC District presidents for their faithful work on behalf of the Synod and the district.
2016 Convention Workbook

The Rev. Dr. Albert M. Marcis served as president from 1972 to 1997.
He has also continued to serve the LCMS in various other capacities.
The Rev. Dr. Carl H. Krueger Jr. served as president from 1997 to
2015, as well as serving in the military chaplaincy program. We thank
both for serving their Lord and church so faithfully.
The SELC continues to spread the Gospel through its mission
outreach, especially with satellite congregations in the Lake Mary
and Tampa, Florida, areas. Work in the Hispanic communities in
Chicago, Illinois, and Whiting, Indiana, continues with both a pastor and deaconess. Multicultural work continues in Toronto, Ontario,
and Montreal, Quebec.
The LWML of the SELC District was one of six districts that
hosted the 2013 LWML convention in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Our
LWML continues to support the work of our mission congregations
in our district and circuits.
The Lutheran Haven in Oviedo, Florida, has been our district
retirement facility since 1947. The Haven also includes nursing facilities and other special care units. Plans are being made to expand the
work. Many retired pastors and various district and Synod officers
have retired at our Lutheran Haven.
The Luther League is the youth organization of our SELC District,
dating back to 1927, when the first convention was held at St. Paul
Lutheran Church, Whiting, Indiana, which will host the 89th annual
convention in 2016. A goodly number of youth groups have also
attended the Synod gatherings.
Financially, the SELC District continues to rank in the top third
of contributions per communicant member for work at large, work at
home, and the Synod’s budget. With no district office building or paid
staff, the SELC continues to practice good stewardship in support of
the Synod, our two seminaries, and various other areas of district and
Synod life and ministry.
In addition to meeting in district conventions, the SELC District
as a whole meets for a district-wide convocation in non-convention
years, as well as each circuit meeting quarterly for two-day conferences sometimes followed with our district board of directors
meetings. As a lifelong member of the SELC, I can attest to the brotherly love of all of our pastors and church workers, and despite the
distances, we have a close relationship with all.
SELC District
Showing Everyone Life in Christ
Showing Everyone the Love of Christ.
Andrew J. Dzurovcik, President
R47

South Dakota District
Greetings to the Synod from the 30,000 baptized members in the
108 congregations of the South Dakota District! We are blessed to
walk together with you in serving our gracious God.
2013 Res. 7-04A requested our evaluation of district viability, and
the respondents to our request for such feedback, via the survey provided, were overwhelmingly positive in holding to the opinion that
the South Dakota District is indeed “viable.” The resources of the district are being used to support the congregations, schools, and other
ministries within our state; the district staff are attentive to the needs
of these ministries; and, above all, God’s precious Word is being
shared throughout the 77,000 square miles of the state, if not through
the physical presence of congregations (we have none in the extreme
northwest part of South Dakota), certainly through the televised worship service we broadcast every Sunday morning throughout the state
(called “Main Street Living”).
Yet, some weaknesses were identified by respondents to the viability survey. Some respondents felt that the district staff tend to be more