LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2016, Page 178

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

178

IV. THEOLOGICAL DOCUMENTS­­—COMMISSION ON THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS
GUIDELINES FOR CONGREGATIONAL, DISTRICT, AND SYNODICAL
COMMUNION STATEMENTS

The President of the Synod requested the Commission on Theology and Church Relations
(CTCR) to prepare guidelines for Communion statements for congregational, district, and
synodical use. The request came to the CTCR after the president made numerous visits to
District Conventions and congregations and witnessed a wide variety (and no small disparity) in
statements addressing admission to the Lord’s Supper.
The challenge of a godly, biblical Communion practice is great. Francis Pieper noted two
potential errors of practice: “On the one hand they [churches and pastors] are not permitted to
introduce ‘Open Communion’; on the other hand, they must guard against denying the
Sacrament to those Christians for whom Christ has appointed it.”1 “Open Communion,” the
admission of individuals to the Sacrament with minimal or no concern for Baptism, repentance,
faith, self-examination, or unity of confession, is intolerable for any who take seriously that our
Lord gave the Supper only to his disciples (Matt 26:20), Paul’s plea that a church be of one mind
or judgment and without division (1 Cor 1:10), and his insistence on self-examination and
discerning the Lord’s body (1 Cor 11:27-28). Just as intolerable is any approach to the Lord’s
Table which discourages repentant, confessing Christians from receiving the gifts of Christ or
implies that only a select few Lutheran Christians are worthy and well-prepared to commune, as
if reception is a reward for doctrinal orthodoxy or denominational affiliation. Recognizing such
opposing errors, however, does not in itself resolve the practical, pastoral questions about how to
administer Christ’s Holy Supper faithfully or to communicate to both members and visitors
biblical truths and concerns about proper, God-pleasing participation in the Lord’s Supper.
The CTCR first issued guidelines for Communion statements in 1993. In the CTCR’s letter to
pastors dated February 22, 1993, the CTCR provided a “Model Communion Statement”
consistent with its 1983 report, Theology and Practice of the Lord’s Supper, and with 1986
Resolution 3-08 “To Maintain Practice of Close Communion.” The letter accompanying the
“Model Communion Statement” of 1993 stated, “The Commission hopes that you will find it
helpful as you evaluate and/or develop your own announcements concerning admission to Holy
Communion.” This 1993 statement was officially “recommended to the member congregations
of the Synod for guidance” by the Synod in convention 1995 Res. 3-08 “To Reaffirm the
Practice of Close[d] Communion.” We may also mention the CTCR 1999 report Admission to
the Lord’s Supper: Basics of Biblical and Confessional Teaching.2 Such documents and
resolutions reflect the underlying respect for and concern with a theology and practice that is part
of the long historic tradition of the church.3
The 1993 CTCR “Model Communion Statement” was intended to serve as an aid to
congregations and pastors “as you evaluate and/or develop your own announcements” (emphasis
added). Thus, although it has been used “as is” by some LCMS pastors and congregations, the
model statement was certainly not intended to be considered either a final word on Communion
statements for the LCMS or a perfect statement. However, it may continue to serve as a widely
acceptable starting point in the development of guidelines for other additional Communion
statements and for consideration of the matter of admission policies.

MODEL COMMUNION CARD STATEMENT
The Lord’s Supper is celebrated at this congregation in the confession and glad
confidence that, as he says, our Lord gives into our mouths not only bread and
wine but his very body and blood to eat and to drink for the forgiveness of sins
and to strengthen our union with him and with one another. Our Lord invites to
his table those who trust his words, repent of all sin, and set aside any refusal to
forgive and love as he forgives and loves us, that they may show forth his death
until he comes.
Because those who eat and drink our Lord’s body and blood unworthily do so to
their great harm and because Holy Communion is a confession of the faith which
is confessed at this altar, any who are not yet instructed, in doubt, or who hold a
confession differing from that of this congregation and The Lutheran Church—
Missouri Synod, and yet desire to receive the sacrament, are asked first to speak
with the pastor or an usher.
For further study, see Matthew 5:23f.; 10:32f.; 18:15-35; 26:26-29; 1 Cor. 11:1734.
It may be helpful to identify the significant emphases of this statement. A couple of general
observations are important before looking at specifics, however. First, we note that the purpose
of the statement is to facilitate a right and blessed receiving of the Sacrament. It attempts to do so
by providing an unmistakable confession of the nature of the Supper and, then, who does and
does not receive the Supper’s intended blessing. This means, second, that the model is by no
means relevant only to the “visitor,” but to all who would commune. Third, the passages listed at
the conclusion are not exhaustive of scriptural teaching on the matter of the Supper and right
reception.
In more specific terms, we note the three major components of the statement. It addresses the
nature of the Supper, then reception of it by individuals, and also considers the Supper as a
confession of faith by a church. Under the heading of individual reception, both a blessed and a
harmful reception are recognized and delineated.
THEOLOGICAL COMPONENTS FOR LUTHERAN COMMUNION PRACTICE
1. The Nature of the Lord’s Supper (“our Lord gives into our mouths not only bread and
wine but his very body and blood to eat and to drink”)
a. The Sacrament is Christ’s body and blood, given orally together with bread and
wine, for the forgiveness of sins.4
b. Christ’s body and blood is intended to benefit the communicant and the church,
but it may be received to the harm of both individual and church.

1

2. The Sacrament’s Benefit (or Harm) to Individuals (“for the forgiveness of sins and to
strengthen our union with him and with one another”)
a. Faith in Christ and his word is necessary for a blessed reception.
i. Faith in Christ and his word implies both baptism in the Triune Name and
trust (faith) in Christ as Savior.5
ii. The communicant is then also called to believe Jesus’ clear words that the
Sacrament is his body and blood.6
iii. The repentant communicant has faith in the Lord’s promise that in the
Sacrament his or her sins are forgiven.7
iv. In trusting Christ’s word, the believing communicant receives the
promised forgiveness and is reaffirmed and strengthened in his or her
union with Christ and other Christians.8
b. The source of harmful reception is unbelief or doubt in Christ’s word.
i. The unbaptized and uninstructed person who does not yet know or believe
in Christ and his promises is unprepared and should not commune.9
ii. The unrepentant person who does not seek Christ’s forgiveness for sins—
either general or particular—or refuses to forgive someone is unprepared
and should not commune.10
iii. The doubting person who denies or is unconvinced of what Jesus says of
his bodily presence in the sacrament or its promised forgiveness is
unprepared and should not commune.11
3. Communion, Communicant, and Church (“Holy Communion is a confession of the
faith”)
a. The church confesses its faith in Christ and the Gospel as it worships and as it
communes.12
b. The person whose life is contrary to the teachings of the communing assembly
introduces harmful division if he or she communes.13
c. The person whose confession of faith (his or her personal beliefs and/or the public
confession made through his or her affiliation with a particular church body) is
contrary to the communing assembly (“to the faith which is confessed at this
altar”) introduces the possibility of doubt, confusion, and potentially harmful
division if he or she communes.14
3

2016 Convention Workbook

2

d. As “the steward of the mysteries of God,” the pastor is called by God through the
congregation to ensure faithful administration of the Supper.
A final observation is in order about the Model Communion Statement. The statement is
obviously intended to inform individuals who may wish to commune about the congregation’s
understanding of the Sacrament and to help them decide whether to come to receive it. As such,
it fits fully into the scriptural admonition, “Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the
bread and drink of the cup” (1 Co 11:28). This individual self-examination is paramount for right
preparation and a blessed reception of the Sacrament. Such personal responsibility should not be
misunderstood, however. There is also a responsibility for the congregation, acting especially
through its pastor, in the matter of admission to the Supper. This responsibility flows especially
out of love for the individual who might commune to his or her harm.15 For that reason the
model urges that in any uncertainties about Communion, individuals should “speak with the
pastor or an usher” (with the presumption that the latter would direct the person to the pastor)
before partaking.
The preceding comments and the specific points identified within the components are intended to
be of further help in the original goal of the Model Communion Statement, to aid in the
evaluation and crafting of Communion announcements or statements.
SAMPLE STATEMENTS
In that regard, we are providing a sampling of Communion statements that are representative of
some of those in use in the LCMS. Each statement is followed by brief comments in light of the
preceding discussion.16
Statement 1
Admission to Holy Communion is by invitation of the Lord, presented through the Church to
those who are baptized. Visitors who are baptized and who trust that Christ is truly present in
this sacrament are welcome to join us at the Lord's Table.
Comments: This statement is welcoming, but unhelpfully brief. It says almost nothing about the
nature of the Sacrament, without any reference to Christ’s body and blood. It also fails to say
anything of either the benefit of the Sacrament (forgiveness) or of the possibility of receiving the
body and blood to one’s judgment. Baptism is required as is trust in Christ’s presence, but that
presence is unclear. Where is Christ not present? Thus, faith in Christ or his words is only
vaguely implied. This statement also fails to address the confessional aspect of the Supper.
Statement 2
If you have never communed at this altar, please introduce yourself to our pastor so that he may
hear your faith before we share Communion with you. We follow the biblical and apostolic
practice of closed Communion. This practice respects Communion as an expression of full unity
in doctrine and practice of all who partake. It also assures that no one receives Communion to
their condemnation. Only members in good standing of congregations of The Lutheran Church
4