Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2016 · 66th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 55

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2016, Page 55

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 front matter 19 front matter 20 front matter 21 front matter 22 front matter 23 front matter 24 front matter 25 front matter 26 front matter 27 front matter 28 front matter 29 front matter 30 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Page 395 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Page 399 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Page 410 Page 411 Page 412 Page 413 Page 414 Page 415 Page 416 Page 417 Page 418 Page 419 Page 420 Page 421 Page 422 Page 423 Page 424 Page 425 Page 426 Page 427 Page 428 Page 429 Page 430 Page 431 Page 432 Page 433 Page 434 Page 435 Page 436 Page 437 Page 438 Page 439 Page 440 Page 441 Page 442 Page 443 Page 444 Page 445 Page 446 Page 447 Page 448 Page 449 Page 450 Page 451 Page 452 Page 453 Page 454 Page 455 Page 456 Page 457 Page 458 Page 459 Page 460 Page 461 Page 462 Page 463 Page 464 Page 465 Page 466 Page 467 Page 468 Page 469 Page 470 Page 471 Page 472 Page 473 Page 474 Page 475 Page 476 Page 477 Page 478 Page 479

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

OFFICER, BOARD, AND COMMISSION REPORTS
exceptions on an individual basis to the prerequisite of eligibility for
state licensure for teacher colloquy applicants. The pertinent policy
now reads as follows:
5.1.1.3.2 Other exceptions to the requirement for eligibility for
teacher licensure may be granted on an individual basis by the Colloquy
Committee for Commissioned Ministry upon the recommendation of the
teacher colloquy program director of the CUS institution through which
the applicant is seeking certification.

This is not offering another option, but rather providing opportunity
for exceptions to be made on the basis of the merits of each individual
case. The full policy manual may be accessed on the Synod website
at http://www.lcms.org/colloquy-ministers-of-religion-commisioned.
The Concordia University System provides for the preparation
of candidates for certification for call and placement as ministers
of religion—commissioned. CUEnet is the organization within the
CUS national office authorized to deliver instruction for colloquy. All
approvals come from the academic institution. The Committee oversees the colloquy process, but most of the actual work is handled by
CUEnet and the Concordia University System. The Committee itself
deals with policies as well as exceptions and difficult cases.
How many people are involved in colloquy through CUEnet? As
of late 2014, approximately 620 people were enrolled in CUEnet
colloquy courses. A total of 1,174 men and women have completed
colloquy courses through CUEnet since its inception in 2001. There
are currently about 10,600 nonrostered teachers in our schools—early
childhood, elementary, and secondary schools (48 percent are LCMS
members). There is therefore a great need for the efforts of CUEnet.
We are thankful for CUEnet and for the people who oversee the
program and teach the courses, particularly its director, Dr. Heather
Stueve, but most of all we are thankful for the people who have been
presented to the church as commissioned ministers, gifts of Christ, by
this process. It is a pleasure to serve the Synod by chairing this committee and working with these people. To God be the glory!
Herbert C. Mueller Jr., First Vice-President, Chairman
R2.3

Koinonia Project
Three years ago, we reported that the “Koinonia Project” is a longterm initiative of the President’s Office under the Constitution of the
Synod, Art. XI B 3, which enjoins the President to “conscientiously
use all means at his command to promote and maintain unity of doctrine and practice in all the districts of the Synod.” Koinonia is the
Greek word meaning “communion,” “partnership,” or “participation
together” in something. Spiritually, koinonia in the New Testament is
always something that the living Lord Jesus Himself works through
His Means of Grace. We do not create koinonia, but by the grace
of God in Christ we live in it and recognize it by the “marks of the
church,” namely, the Gospel purely preached and the Sacraments
rightly administered (Apology VII and VIII).
The project fosters theological study and discussion groups at
many levels designed to bring together capable and respected people
to study God’s Word and the Confessions of our church so that, by
God’s grace, we come to clear agreement on (1) the points at issue;
(2) what we confess together; (3) what we reject, and (4) what we will
therefore do together on the basis of Scripture and our Confessions.
We have chosen to call this effort to develop spiritual and theological
solutions to our difficulties the “Koinonia Project” because we pray
that God will build and strengthen our unity in the Word of God, that
is, our “koinonia” together.
During the 2010–2013 triennium, we were developing the basic
concepts and running several pilot efforts. As will be explained
below, during the present triennium, under my leadership as First

55

Vice-President, along with Rev. Randy Golter (special assistant to the
President), we sought to broaden and deepen the effort across many
areas of the Synod. We are the first to say that much more needs to
be done for this long-term effort.
2013 Synod Convention
At the 2013 Convention, the Synod wholeheartedly supported
the Koinonia Project by passing Res. 3-01A, which, among other
things, resolved to (1) encourage widespread support for the project,
(2) develop a website, (3) form three theological study groups in the
Council of Presidents, (4) encourage circuit winkel meetings to use
the Koinonia Project, and (5) involve more church workers and laity
at all levels of the Synod in the project (2013 Proceedings, p. 115).
How have we done? How has God blessed our efforts?
Again, this is a decades-long initiative. As will be shown below,
however, support and participation is increasing such that the
President has assigned one of his assistants, Rev. Randy Golter,
to assist me with the project. Koinonia materials are available on
the Synod website at www.lcms.org/koinoniaproject. Many more
resources need to be written and added to this site. We continue to
encourage participation at the circuit level and have conducted presentations and retreats to that end.
Council of Presidents
One of the most helpful efforts thus far has been the participation
of the Council of Presidents. Res. 3-01A mandated that the Council
form (by blind draw) three study groups, both to lead by example and
to provide a forum for the members of the COP to work toward greater
unity on the council. The three groups were formed in November
2013. The council began with a Koinonia Retreat at its February
2014 meeting. At nearly every meeting since then, the council has
been engaged in theological discussion around some of the issues that
bring friction among us. One group discussed admission to the Lord’s
Supper, another the “communicant as confessor,” and the third group
focused on the role of the laity in the mission of the church. There are
no statements prepared by these groups yet, but the council has been
drawn closer together in the process.
Since the publication of the report of the Res. 4-06A Task Force on
licensed lay deacons, the Council has held, within the three Koinonia
groups and in plenary, extensive discussion of the proposal to require
deacons licensed for Word and Sacrament ministry as de facto pastors to undergo colloquy to the SMP roster. While not completely
unanimous, as of this writing a broad consensus has developed that
if the church sends a man regularly to preach and administer the
Sacraments, he needs either to be ordained or en route to ordination.
Future meetings will certainly entail more work on this topic.
Atlantic and Wyoming Districts
One quite public effort with respect to the Koinonia Project has
been the joint efforts of the Atlantic and Wyoming District pastoral
conferences. The two districts held a joint pastoral conference (supported, in part, by a Thrivent grant) in May 2014 in New York City,
led by myself and Chaplain William Weedon of our staff. A second
conference involving the same groups took place in September 2015
in Cheyenne, Wyoming. In February 2016, five representatives from
each district met for discussion and to chart a course forward, thanks
also to the leadership of the two new district presidents, John Hill of
Wyoming and Derek Lecakes from Atlantic. Each district has asked
questions of the other for clarification. Each district will discuss how
to answer and will come back together at a future date under the blessing of God. There are many challenges, but both districts are quite
committed to continuing the conversation.
2016 Convention Workbook