Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1969 · 48th Convention › Page 102

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1969, Page 102

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

OEE LAB EELIE AEE AE SEALE IE LE ADE AAS ELLEN EEN TSE HO

102 RESOLUTIONS

To Seek Guidance from “Theology
of Fellowship” for Interchurch Relations
RESOLUTION 3-22
Overtures 2-32, 2-33, 3-275, 3-276 (CW, pp. 81—82, 199)

Wuereas, In relationships among Christians who are
not in official church fellowship circumstances arise for
which no special course of action can be prescribed; and

Wuereas, “Theology of Fellowship” (Part 3, C) pro-
vides guidelines for a proper course of action in such
circumstances; therefore be it

Resolved, That the Synod encourage the study of
“Theology of Fellowship” for guidance.

Action: Adopted (16).

To Accept Part II (“Church Relations” )
of Report of Commission on Theology
and Church Relations
RESOLUTION 3-23
Report 2-01, II (CW, pp. 59—63)

Resolved, That the Synod accept Part II (“Church
Relations”) of the report of the Commission on Theol-
ogy and Church Relations.

Action: Adopted (16).

4. SYNODICAL ADMINISTRATION

To Accept Report of First Vice-President
RESOLUTION 4-01
Report 4-02 (CW, p. 201)

Resolved, That the Synod accept the report of the
First Vice-President; and be it further

Resolved, That the Synod express its thankfulness
to the Lord for providing the Synod with the many
talents of Doctor Roland P. Wiederaenders in fulfilling
the varied requirements of his office; and be it finally

Resolved, That the Synod commend him in particu-
lar for his leadership of the colloquy committee.

Action: Adopted (5).

To Accept Report of Board of Directors
RESOLUTION 4-02
Report 4-03 I, Il, HI (CW, pp. 201—204)

Whereas, The report of the Board of Directors gives
evidence of faithful and competent performance in
seeking to carry out the directives of the Synod during
the past biennium; therefore be it

Resolved, That the report of the Board of Directors
be gratefully accepted.

Action: Adopted (5).

To Establish General Principles for Formation
or Realignment of Districts
RESOLUTION 4-03

Report 4-03, IV, A (CW, p. 204)

Wuereas, The formation of new Districts or realign-
ment of existing Districts is a process that should be
guided by general principles established by the Synod;
therefore be it

Resolved, That the following statements be accepted
as general principles for judging the viability of a pro-
posed new or realigned District:

A viable District —

1. offers adequate parish services;

2. provides adequate mission development, guidance,
and support;

3. is adaptable and flexible in meeting new and vari-
ous needs for ministry;

4. has boundaries corresponding to the major com-
munications spheres in a given area;

5. centers in a metropolitan area and has boundaries
and internal structures adapted to the metropolitan areas
within its boundaries;

6. evidences balance rather than mere homogeneity:

7. is compact in terms of travel patterns and travel
times;

8. has sufficient potential financial resources for its
own programs and for the support of the synodical
ministries;

9. is large enough to be effective and efficient;

10. has general acceptance by the constituency in-
volved.

Action: Adopted (5).

To Make Additions to Bylaw 3.03
Governing Formation and Realignment
of Districts
RESOLUTION 4-04
Report 4-03, IV, A (CW, p. 204)

Wuereas, There appears to be an increasing need for
general principles of procedure and. viability to serve
as guidelines for the formation of new Districts or for
the realignment of existing Districts; and

Whereas, The Board of Directors, acting upon in-
struction of the New York convention, has studied this
matter and has developed general principles for these
purposes; therefore be it

Resolved, That the following additions be made to
Section 3.03 of the Bylaws:

3.03 Formation and Realignment of Districts

a. The Synod decides when and whether a District shall
be formed, divided, realigned, or merged with another or
other Districts, or dissolved; determines the boundaries of
a District; and approves the name of a District.

b. A proposal calling for the formation, division, realign-
ment, merger, or dissolution of a District or Districts may be

X
\
: