Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1969 · 48th Convention › Page 88

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1969, Page 88

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

88 RESOLUTIONS

Wuereas, The affirmation requested by these over-
tures is an affirmation of a vital aspect of the church’s
faith, as is evident from the following considerations:

a. The heart of the New Testament message is the
Good News of an event which took place in history,
“under Pontius Pilate” in Palestine; this Good News
concerns a historical figure, Jesus of Nazareth; the
validity of the apostolic proclamation and the faith of
the church stand or fall with the historical reality of
the event (1 Cor. 15:1-19; John 15: 22-24). The Gospels
therefore invite historical investigation and are to be
taken seriously as historical documents.

b. The event recorded in the Gospels is unique,
without analogy in human history. It is nothing less
than God’s entering into human history for us men
and for our salvation in the Person of Him in whom
“the Godhead dwells bodily.” It is the crisis point and
turning point of human history, the coming in of the
new world of God, the dawn of the new creation. His-
torical investigation here moves in the presence of the
Creator, present in the Person of Jesus of Nazareth;
historical investigation must reckon with the unlimited
power of Him who raises the dead and calls into being
the things that are not. Here the miracle is not only
a possibility or probability; it is essential to the pres-
ence and activity of the Creator and Redeemer. Chris-
tian historical investigation must therefore beware of
measuring probabilities by standards taken from a sec-
ularized conception of history; the warning uttered by
the document “A Lutheran Stance Toward Biblical
Studies” (Part Two, Chapter 3) is very much in place.

c. The apostolic proclamation of the event and the
inscripturation of that proclamation took place under
the impulsion and discipline of the Spirit of Truth.
He glorifies the Christ through the witness of men. To
attribute to the church a creatively formative part in
the witness to the event is to fly in the face of all that
is revealed concerning the activity of the Spirit; such
an attribution introduces an intolerable synergism at a
crucial point in the saving work of God.

The Spirit moves and works in sovereign freedom,
and it has pleased Him to give the church the record
of Christ in a rich variety and diversity of human
accents, in order to bring home to man the whole un-
searchable riches of Christ. It is not the business of
the church to pick and choose among this variety, and
the church has no reason to be embarrassed by this
diversity. Rather it is the business of the Christian
and Christian scholarship to welcome and use this
variety and diversity for the enrichment and deepening
of their faith; therefore be it

Resolved, That the 1969 convention of The Lutheran
Church — Missouri Synod affirm the historicity of the
New Testament, making this affirmation as an act of
faith in the incarnation of our Lord as attested and
presented in living reality by the Spirit of Truth in
words which He Himself has taught.

Action: Adopted (8).

(The following amendment was offered but failed to
carry: To substitute in the first whereas “Therefore be it re-
solved that we affirm the following” for “as is evident from
the following considerations” and then to drop the resolved
printed above. Another unsuccessful amendment sought to
change the title to: “To Affirm the New Testament Record
of Our Incarnate Lord.”)

To Grant Woman Suffrage and
Board Membership
RESOLUTION 2-17

Report 2-01, I, J; Overtures 2-35, 2-36; Appendix II(CW,
pp. 59, 84—85, 514—522); 2-67U (URO, p. 8)

Wuereas, The Commission on Theology and Church
Relations, in accordance with Resolutions 2-05. and 2-06
of the New York convention, made “a detailed and ex-
haustive study of the entire question of woman suffrage
in the church” and of “the matter of full membership of
women on synodical boards, commissions, and com-
mittees”; and

Wuereas, The Commission on Theology and Church
Relations has submitted its report (CW, pp. 514—522);
therefore be it

Resolved, That we express gratitude to the Com-
mission on Theology and Church Relations for this
study; and be it further

Resolved, That we commend this study, as well as the
study of the special committee reported in the Pro-
ceedings, 1956 (pp. 553—569), to all congregations of the
Synod; and be it further

Resolved, That the Synod accept the following dec-
larations as guides on this matter:

1. Those statements of Scripture which direct women
to keep silent in the church and which prohibit them to
teach and to exercise authority over men, we under-
stand to mean that women ought not to hold the pastoral
office or serve in any other capacity involving the dis-
tinctive functions of this office.

2. The principles set forth in such passages, we be-
lieve, prohibit holding any other kind of office or mem-
bership on boards or committees in the institutional
structures of a congregation, only if this involves women
in a violation of the order of creation. We hold that they
do not prohibit full membership of women on synodical
boards, commissions, and committees. The manner of
filling an office or establishing membership on a board
or commission, in congregations or in the Synod, has no
prohibitory Scriptural implications.

3. We hold likewise that Scripture does not prohibit
women from exercising the franchise in congregational
or synodical assemblies.

4. We therefore conclude that the Synod itself and
the congregations of the Synod are at liberty to alter
their policies and practices in regard to women’s in-
volvement in the work of the church according to these
declarations, provided the polity developed conforms to
the general Scriptural principles that women neither
hold the pastoral office nor “exercise authority over
men”; and be it finally

=

z
Fi
i
'