Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1969 · 48th Convention › Page 49

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1969, Page 49

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

PRESIDENT’S REPORT 49

operations. Frankly, I am optimistic about the poten-
tial for the work of the church if we take God and
our people at their word.

It is not my intention to report extensively on the
implementation of all resolutions adopted by the Synod
or all work assigned to the President’s office. A listing
is appended to this report. Without minimizing the im-
portance of other resolutions and the efforts put forth
to carry them out, I will report now in greater detail
on the implementation of the one resolution which has
been the major concern of the Synod during the last
two years. I refer, of course, to Resolution 3-23 con-
cerning altar and pulpit fellowship with The American
Lutheran Church.

In adopting Resolution 3-23 the Synod undertook
a new course in church relations. Previously the Synod
handled such matters at delegate conventions. While
Resolution 3-23 does not say this explicitly, it does
imply that the delegates two years ago felt that church
fellowship had dimensions beyond those that we have
dealt with in the past. It was the hope of the 1967
convention that all members of the Synod should have
an opportunity to discover agreement in the doctrine
of the Gospel as our representatives and commissioners

had previously done. It was the hope of the delegates
that all members of the Synod would through their
participation come to the conviction that they would
want to assume the privileges and responsibilities of
living in fellowship with members of The American
Lutheran Church.

Within weeks after the convention had closed, my
office launched the first steps in carrying out the re-
sponsibilities assigned to it by the convention. A spe-
cial committee set up arrangements for such imple-
mentation. By November of 1967 plans had been
completed for materials and representatives to carry
the word of the convention to the congregations by
way of the District conventions. Late in that November
I presented the materials later entitled “Toward Fel-
lowship” to a meeting of District Presidents to which
also members of the Board of Directors and Council
of Administrators had been invited as guests. At that
time the District Presidents requested that “Toward
Fellowship” be published and distributed through their
offices to all pastors and congregations almost immedi-
ately and certainly in advance of almost all District
conventions. Through the cooperation of the District
Presidents, a minimum of one-half day of convention

Two treasured servants of the Synod —
Dr. Oliver Harms and Dr. John Herrmann