Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1989 · 57th Convention › Page 114

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1989, Page 114

front matter 1 front matter 2 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

114 RESOLUTIONS

considered the questions that had been placed to us. And
these 11 members consisted of 3 people who are serving
on the CTCR and 2 on the seminary faculties. So, 5 of the
people on the voting membership of this committee were
members of the CTCR or the seminary faculties.

Starting at this point with statements such as this from
the commission’s report, and I quote from our document,
“When a congregation is temporarily without a man to fill
the office of the public ministry in its midst, it may ask a
properly supervised teacher or lay leader to perform some
functions of the office of the public ministry. The oversight
and accountability remain with the one whom the church
has called and designated as a pastor and who supervises
those who temporarily perform some pastoral functions.”
In conclusion, the commission stated in this report, “Func-
tions that are essentially exercises of the ministry of Word
and Sacrament should be performed by those who hold the
office of the public ministry. Thus, preaching in the wor-
ship service, leading in public prayer, celebration of the
sacraments, weddings, and funeral services should be car-
ried out by those who hold the office of the public ministry.
However, in exceptional circumstances, or in emergencies,
members of the auxiliary offices and other individuals may
temporarily be called upon to perform, under proper su-
pervision, functions that are otherwise performed by the
pastor.”

It was just such statements as this from the Commis-
sion’s report that formed the starting point and the basis
and the boundaries upon which the Lay Worker Study
Committee established its guidelines as presented in this
resolution. Therefore, it is consistent with this position to
recognize that at the present time, with the blessing of the
Synod, there are 125 lay ministers carrying out ministries
of Word and Sacrament. At the present time that’s going
on. It’s also consistent with the statement that was made
recently by the District of which I am a member, the Mis-
souri District. And I want to read to you a statement that
was sent out by the president of the Missouri District, Paul
Spitz, in which he makes precisely the same point:

It has come to the attention of the District Praesidium
that nonordained workers in the District are being in-
vited to preach on occasion from the pulpits of our con-
gregations during the regular divine services. Such
invitations place these workers in an awkward position,
since they are not called by the congregations of the
District to perform the ministry to which ordained pas-
tors have been called. Our Confessions state, “Our
churches teach that nobody should publicly preach in
the church or administer the sacraments unless he is
regularly called” (Augsburg Confession XIV).

And then, listen to this statement from the Missouri Dis-
trict Praesidium:

Certified lay ministers are an exception because they
work under the supervision of pastors, and they have
been certified to preach by the Synod and the congre-
gations they serve. Nor does this rule out special and
emergency situations, in which a layman may be called
to lead a service or read a sermon written by an ordained
pastor. Because of our confessional basis and for the sake

of good order in the church, the Praesidium requests that
the congregations please take note of this concern. Non-
ordained men can certainly speak at graduation cere-
monies, school chapel addresses, etc. This should be
without vestments, and not from the pulpit. We suggest
that when District staff are invited to speak during the
worship service, that they give their message from the
lectern and that the pastor also have a shorter sermon
or homily. Another option is that the pastor have a short-
ened service and give the District worker time to speak
before or after the service.

What we have proposed is exactly what is stated here.
But at the present time in the Synod, there exists no pro-
vision for the proper supervision or accountability of those
workers who have been asked to carry out distinctive func-
tions of the pastoral office without having been placed in
that office.

We have many dedicated lay ministers who for up to
20 years have been asked to carry out a ministry of Word
and Sacrament without recognition or supervision, with-
out roster or doctrinal oversight. If we want to undermine
Art. XIV of the Augsburg Confession, the surest way is to
leave things the way they are, and to have no accounta-
bility or supervision. The adoption of Res. 3-05 does not
initiate a single new practice in the doctrine of the ministry
of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod. It will, how-
ever, initiate proper supervision of those practices which
we have long recognized as being consistent with our un-
derstanding of the doctrine of the ministry so that we may
all together tell everyone what He has done.

To Strengthen Relationships with LCMS
Partner Churches

RESOLUTION 3-06
Reports R1-8, R3-01 (CW, pp. 3, 60-61)

Wuereas, The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod en-
joys altar and pulpit fellowship with partner/sister
churches throughout the world; and

Wuereas, Many of these churches are small and in need
of encouragement and additional resources; and

Wuereas, The President of the Synod has called into
being the Church Relations Department to coordinate
church-relations contacts with partner churches; and

Wuereas, The Commission on Theology and Church
Relations has initiated and supported plans for an Inter-
national Theologians’ Convocation involving theologians
from the Synod’s partner churches to be held in Seoul,
Korea, in September of 1989; therefore be it

Resolved, That the Synod rejoice and give thanks to God
for the confessional unity that binds us together with these
partner churches; and be it further

Resolved, That the Synod commend the efforts that have
already been made to strengthen these relationships; and
be it further

Resolved, That the Synod encourage the President of
the Synod and the Church Relations Department to in-
tensify such efforts; and be it finally