Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1989 · 57th Convention › Page 114
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1989, Page 114
front matter 1
front matter 2
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
114 RESOLUTIONS
considered the questions that had been placed to us. And
these 11 members consisted of 3 people who are serving
on the CTCR and 2 on the seminary faculties. So, 5 of the
people on the voting membership of this committee were
members of the CTCR or the seminary faculties.
Starting at this point with statements such as this from
the commission’s report, and I quote from our document,
“When a congregation is temporarily without a man to fill
the office of the public ministry in its midst, it may ask a
properly supervised teacher or lay leader to perform some
functions of the office of the public ministry. The oversight
and accountability remain with the one whom the church
has called and designated as a pastor and who supervises
those who temporarily perform some pastoral functions.”
In conclusion, the commission stated in this report, “Func-
tions that are essentially exercises of the ministry of Word
and Sacrament should be performed by those who hold the
office of the public ministry. Thus, preaching in the wor-
ship service, leading in public prayer, celebration of the
sacraments, weddings, and funeral services should be car-
ried out by those who hold the office of the public ministry.
However, in exceptional circumstances, or in emergencies,
members of the auxiliary offices and other individuals may
temporarily be called upon to perform, under proper su-
pervision, functions that are otherwise performed by the
pastor.”
It was just such statements as this from the Commis-
sion’s report that formed the starting point and the basis
and the boundaries upon which the Lay Worker Study
Committee established its guidelines as presented in this
resolution. Therefore, it is consistent with this position to
recognize that at the present time, with the blessing of the
Synod, there are 125 lay ministers carrying out ministries
of Word and Sacrament. At the present time that’s going
on. It’s also consistent with the statement that was made
recently by the District of which I am a member, the Mis-
souri District. And I want to read to you a statement that
was sent out by the president of the Missouri District, Paul
Spitz, in which he makes precisely the same point:
It has come to the attention of the District Praesidium
that nonordained workers in the District are being in-
vited to preach on occasion from the pulpits of our con-
gregations during the regular divine services. Such
invitations place these workers in an awkward position,
since they are not called by the congregations of the
District to perform the ministry to which ordained pas-
tors have been called. Our Confessions state, “Our
churches teach that nobody should publicly preach in
the church or administer the sacraments unless he is
regularly called” (Augsburg Confession XIV).
And then, listen to this statement from the Missouri Dis-
trict Praesidium:
Certified lay ministers are an exception because they
work under the supervision of pastors, and they have
been certified to preach by the Synod and the congre-
gations they serve. Nor does this rule out special and
emergency situations, in which a layman may be called
to lead a service or read a sermon written by an ordained
pastor. Because of our confessional basis and for the sake
of good order in the church, the Praesidium requests that
the congregations please take note of this concern. Non-
ordained men can certainly speak at graduation cere-
monies, school chapel addresses, etc. This should be
without vestments, and not from the pulpit. We suggest
that when District staff are invited to speak during the
worship service, that they give their message from the
lectern and that the pastor also have a shorter sermon
or homily. Another option is that the pastor have a short-
ened service and give the District worker time to speak
before or after the service.
What we have proposed is exactly what is stated here.
But at the present time in the Synod, there exists no pro-
vision for the proper supervision or accountability of those
workers who have been asked to carry out distinctive func-
tions of the pastoral office without having been placed in
that office.
We have many dedicated lay ministers who for up to
20 years have been asked to carry out a ministry of Word
and Sacrament without recognition or supervision, with-
out roster or doctrinal oversight. If we want to undermine
Art. XIV of the Augsburg Confession, the surest way is to
leave things the way they are, and to have no accounta-
bility or supervision. The adoption of Res. 3-05 does not
initiate a single new practice in the doctrine of the ministry
of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod. It will, how-
ever, initiate proper supervision of those practices which
we have long recognized as being consistent with our un-
derstanding of the doctrine of the ministry so that we may
all together tell everyone what He has done.
To Strengthen Relationships with LCMS
Partner Churches
RESOLUTION 3-06
Reports R1-8, R3-01 (CW, pp. 3, 60-61)
Wuereas, The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod en-
joys altar and pulpit fellowship with partner/sister
churches throughout the world; and
Wuereas, Many of these churches are small and in need
of encouragement and additional resources; and
Wuereas, The President of the Synod has called into
being the Church Relations Department to coordinate
church-relations contacts with partner churches; and
Wuereas, The Commission on Theology and Church
Relations has initiated and supported plans for an Inter-
national Theologians’ Convocation involving theologians
from the Synod’s partner churches to be held in Seoul,
Korea, in September of 1989; therefore be it
Resolved, That the Synod rejoice and give thanks to God
for the confessional unity that binds us together with these
partner churches; and be it further
Resolved, That the Synod commend the efforts that have
already been made to strengthen these relationships; and
be it further
Resolved, That the Synod encourage the President of
the Synod and the Church Relations Department to in-
tensify such efforts; and be it finally