Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1989 · 57th Convention › Page 69
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1989, Page 69
front matter 1
front matter 2
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
we've had an excellent group of doctrinal reviewers who
have taken their work very seriously.
Government contacts are especially important these
days. As you may have read, the LCMS filed an amicus
brief in the Webster case on abortion that the Supreme
Court ruled on the other day. Our brief, which is cited twice
in footnotes in the opinion of one of the justices, is very
typical of the leadership we have been able to give as a
church body in this critical issue. The LCMS today has the
strongest, most compassionate pro-life position of any
church body in the United States, a fact that is recognized
and appreciated throughout the length and breadth of this
nation. Our efforts are not supportive of those whose ac-
tions violate the civil rights of others. Although we have
a strong pro-life position, we must also uphold law and
order in our society. The Webster decision, although it dis-
appoints us in some ways, is a step in the right direction.
It also demonstrates that the legal processes of this great
nation do work. Even when we disagree with government
positions, we have the freedom to say so and to become a
part of the democratic process to seek change. Because
abortion remains an important issue for the future, I hope
that during this convention delegates will have opportu-
nity to speak out on the current pro-life questions facing
our nation.
I would also like to call your attention to some items on
page 4. First, I want to emphasize that nothing is more
vital for our church body than the spiritual growth of every
one of our members, and that happens best through the
ministry of our congregations. Passing resolutions at con-
ventions is important. (We have 132 of them ready to go,
which means passing 19 a day.) Predictably, however,
we're going to go home thinking that because we’ve passed
all of these wonderful resolutions, we’ve done the work of
the Lord. But nothing is more important in the Lord’s work
than the spiritual life and growth of the people of God.
What presidents and secretaries, vice-presidents and
staffs—and even conventions—do is to support and en-
courage the growth of God’s people through Word and Sac-
raments. The number one priority of the LCMS is the
spiritual growth of our people through the Word of God
and the Sacraments of God. As we know, through these
means, wonderful things are done by our good and gracious
Lord through the gift of His Spirit.
I also call your attention to a very brief report on con-
gregational ministries. It goes without saying that con-
gregations are the heart and center of the Synod’s life and
work. Our Constitution and Bylaws make it quite clear
that the Synod is not some far-off organization that exists
in St. Louis, or in District offices, or in other similar places.
Ultimately, the Synod is nothing other than we, the people
of God in the 6,100 congregations of the Synod. The Synod
exists to help ministry happen in parishes, and it functions
on behalf of and in support of our parishes. We have re-
alized that, I believe, with growing clarity and conviction
in the life and work of the Synod again in this past trien-
nium. Some new and exciting things have been going on
and we're going to be talking about them in this conven-
tion—and I hope reporting enthusiastically on them to the
folks back home. Some new things are happening in the
way the LCMS hopes to develop networking and vision and
REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT 69
relationship-building within the Synod, all based on-our
solid theology of the Word of God, and done in a way that
will help congregations better than we have done for many
years.
I have also addressed the issue of our financial diffi-
culties, but the Board of Directors does it more thoroughly
in its report.
Comments on Part II
At this point, I'd like for you to turn to the second part
of my report in Today’s Business. Several of you heard this
report when we met together in St. Louis at the excellent
floor committee meetings in late May. (Parenthetically, I
want to commend the committees for their hard work in
responding to 101 reports and 583 overtures in the reso-
lutions that are before us for action.) Near the bottom of
page 25 you'll see two questions that I asked the members
of the floor committees, and that I would like to put to all
of you this morning, and again and again as you transact
the business of this great convention.
Question 1: What would the Lutheran Church—Mis-
souri Synod be like in 1995, two conventions away, if the
Synod as a whole, and each of its congregations (and I
suppose we could add, each of us individually within our
congregations) would carry out the Great Commission as
faithfully and effectively as we can?
Somehow we all know that we are not doing that as
faithfully and effectively as we can. When you pose this
question, you are doing what the organizational theorists
call “visioning.” You're trying to develop a picture of what
you want our beloved church body and all of our congre-
gations to be like through being faithful to God and effec-
tive in God’s service. I'd like you to think about that. What
kind of a church would we be? How large would we be?
What would we be doing, if we were really faithful and
effective in carrying out God’s Great Commission given us
by our Lord Jesus Christ?
Question 2: What steps do we need to take now, at this
convention, and during the next triennium in our congre-
gations, Districts, Circuits, institutions, colleges, and sem-
inaries, and what do J need to do as a person, as a member
of my family, and with my children—what do all of us need
to do to move us toward those goals that we believe are
possible and attainable for us in 1995?
In the following paragraphs, I shared some of my per-
sonal dreams of what the Synod, under God’s blessing,
might be like in 1995. As you read my dreams, you will
also understand something about the direction and the
emphases of the President’s office, and the kinds of things
that I’ve been committing my time to. A reporter asked me
the other day what I consider to be the biggest issue facing
this convention, and I said almost instinctively, “Missions!
Getting into the people’s hearts once again the great zeal
for carrying out the Great Commission of our Lord. And
in order to do that, congregational ministry for spiritual
growth is right behind it.” (By the way, neither of those
emphases appeared in the article, evidently because such
matters are not considered newsworthy.)
By 1995, in the area of missions, I see The Lutheran
Church—Missouri Synod as a senior partner in a world-
wide association of confessional Lutheran churches en-