Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1989 · 57th Convention › Page 65

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1989, Page 65

front matter 1 front matter 2 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

while encouraging more and more laity to carry out both
full- and part-time ministries.

By 1995, I believe our system of elementary and sec-
ondary schools will be even stronger than it is today,

ce ~ Jargely because of a stronger emphasis on evangelism and

8- ». the fact that a higher percentage of teachers will be syn-

38 * odically trained and certified.

e By 1995 our Concordia Publishing House will be more
~ widely recognized as the premier religious publisher in the

~ nation because the materials produced there are both ped-

~ agogically and theologically superior.

-. In short, by 1995, the LCMS will recognize itself—and
be recognized by others—as a church body whose congre-

7 gations are not only strong and lively, but central to the

- work of the Synod.

wee eee

3. Theology

By 1995, I believe The Lutheran Church—Missouri
Synod will continue to be the strongest confessional Lu-
theran church body in the world, not only in terms of size,
but in terms of the clarity and faithfulness of confessional
witness. Discussions over the ministry of women, inter-
Christian relationships, church and ministry, and other
topics will have helped the Synod to achieve an even
stronger theological consensus on the basis of the Word of
God than that which characterizes us today, and to do so
with a clear focus on the forgiveness of sins as the center
of the Biblical Gospel.

By 1995, our theological commitment will be expressed
through a stronger International Lutheran Conference of
confessional churches around the world, the publication of
major theological works, and strong graduate schools of
theology that equip many of the teachers of theology and
religion in seminaries and colleges around the world.

By 1995, Missouri’s conversations with other Lutherans
will have brought about closer ties with the Wisconsin and
Evangelical Lutheran Synods, and many in the ELCA, too,
will look upon us and our position with increasing favor.
In short, as we prepare to celebrate our 150th anniversary
in 1997, we will do so by praising God for the continuing
strong theological convictions of our members.

4, Funding

By 1995, the people of The Lutheran Church—Missouri
Synod will be providing as much as one-third more finan-
cial resources for the total work of the church at congre-
gational, District, national, and international levels.
Although a wide variety of successful stewardship pro-
grams will be readily available to each congregation
through the many networks and linkages that have been
established by District and national offices, it will be rec-
ognized that the key to better stewardship performance
lies in the cultivation of the spiritual faith and life of every
member of every congregation.

Moreover, by 1995, I see every dimension of the Synod
allocating financial resources in ways that reflect our mis-
sion and nurture priorities. As more and more individual
members have learned the joy of firstfruits giving, so more
congregations, Districts, and the Synod itself have allo-
cated their firstfruits for work beyond themselves. Bud-
geting processes at congregational, District, and national

REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT 65

levels will have learned to distinguish between mainte-
nance items, such as necessary administrative costs, and
mission and ministry items.

By 1995 or sooner, necessary maintenance costs for the
Synod and its Districts will be increasingly met by member
congregations through a proportionate or “fair share” sys-
tem, with the multiple mission and ministry challenges of
the church at every level being met by voluntary cove-
nanting for specific projects. Planned giving and special
giving will continue to be a major element in our total
stewardship effort, with the excellent efforts of the ’80s
already providing substantial resources beyond the regu-
lar Sunday offerings, thereby enabling the Synod to have
its mission opportunities, as well as its colleges and sem-
inaries, on a sound financial basis.

In short, by 1995 we will have made substantial prog-
ress both in giving more dollars for the Lord’s work and
in spending them for high priority mission and ministry
projects.

5. Organization and Leadership

By 1995, The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod will
have made adjustments to its structure (without changing
its basic polity) in order to provide for broad representative
decision-making at every level, with decisions coming as
close to the action as possible, and with widespread own-
ership of the people in the process. Planning will be done
in coordinated ways, with parallel structures existing be-
tween national and District areas. Strong Districts will
continue to have considerable autonomy in providing lead-
ership within Districts, but the linkage between each Dis-
trict and the rest of Synod will be equally strong—in both
confessional and organizational solidarity. Synod’s tradi-
tional polity, with its decentralized, democratic decision-
making, will remain intact, but the national synodical of-
fices and structure will have taken on new importance and
appreciation for the entire Synod, not only because of the
success of networking and other relational ways of serving
congregations, but because Synod’s leaders exercise their
responsibilities evangelically, fraternally, and with full
and clear accountability to the congregations of the Synod.

6. Higher Education

By the mid-’90s, the Synod’s colleges and seminaries
will have begun to emerge from two decades of grave dif-
ficulty caused by inadequate resources and declining pop-
ulation growth. Solidly confessional seminaries will be
clearly in tune with congregational needs and will receive
more generous support from the synodical budget.

By 1995, adequate scholarship resources will enable
both colleges and seminaries to attract significantly more
minority students to prepare for church-work careers.
Seminaries will have completed a curriculum restudy and
revision which rightly underscores their essential role as
schools of theology, and not merely professional trade
schools for the teaching of technical ministerial skills—but
with greater attention to contemporary needs and oppor-
tunities enabled by an improved financial base. Seminary
faculty members, as servants of the Synod, will be seen as
teachers, not only of tomorrow’s pastors, but of today’s—