Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2023 · 68th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 188
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 2023, Page 188
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
7. UNIVERSITY EDUCATION
using a ballot containing only the current president’s
name, the board of regents shall vote, the majority action
of the board of regents being required to extend the
president’s term for an additional five years.
(1) In addition to considering the evaluation report,
the board of regents shall as part of its review consult
with the President of the Synod and the chairman of
the Board of Directors of Concordia University
System.
(2) The regents may consult with other boards,
commissions, and councils of the Synod as they deem
wise.
(d) In the event that a president’s term is not renewed,
the office of the president shall be considered vacant as
of the end of the term of the incumbent.
(e) A president who is on a roster of the Synod is under
the ecclesiastical supervision of the Synod. In the event a
member is removed from membership in the Synod
pursuant to procedure established in these Bylaws, then
that member is also considered removed from the
position held and shall be terminated forthwith by the
board of regents.
(f) A president who is not on the roster of the Synod
shall be a member of a member congregation of the
Synod. He shall be subject to ecclesiastical supervision as
to doctrine, life, and administration of office, by the
respective geographic district president. He shall, for
actions contrary to the confession of Constitution Art. II
or persistence in offensive conduct, after previous futile
admonition, be subject to the process of Bylaw section
2.14 as if he were a member of the Synod. Should he be
suspended and not contest the suspension, or the
suspension be upheld by a hearing panel and/or final
hearing panel, he shall be considered removed from the
position held and shall be terminated forthwith by the
board of regents.
3.10.6.68.2The following process shall govern the selection of
a college/university president.
(a) When a vacancy or an impending vacancy in the
office of president is known, the board of regents shall
inform the campus constituencies, the Board of
Directors of Concordia University System, the President
of the Synod, an official periodical of the Synod, and
other parties as appropriate. If a vacancy in a presidency
occurs, the board of regents shall appoint an interim
president, who shall meet the qualifications established
for the office of president. He shall bear the title “interim
president” and may not serve more than eighteen (18)
months without the concurrence of the President of the
Synod. Such interim appointee shall be ineligible to
serve on a permanent basis without the concurrence of
the President of the Synod.
(21) The board of regents shall requestinitiate that
the Board of Directors of Concordia University System
schedule a transition review of the campus, which
shall include consultation with Concordia University
System on the basis of the Lutheran Identity and
Mission Outcomes Standards and the institution’s
most recent affirmation review. The review is to
188 | PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2023 (68TH) LCMS CONVENTION
provide a report on the state of the campus for use by
the search committee, the board of regents, and the
candidates.
(12) The board of regents shall request that the Board
of Directors of Concordia University System authorize
the institution to, on the basis of the above
consultation, compose and, with the concurrence of
CUS, publish a request for nominations for the
position of president.
…
3.10.6.8.3 The president, in his service as spiritual head of the
college or university, shall be ecclesiastically reviewed by
the Concordia University System.
(a) The Concordia University System Board of Directors
may call up for formal review any action or inaction of
the president that, in its view, may be in violation of the
doctrine or practice of the Synod (Constitution Art. II) or
to have caused the institution to be not in good standing
with the Synod (Bylaw 3.6.6.4.1 [e]). Such review may be
requested of the president himself or of the president
and the respective board of regents.
(b) Should the action or inaction prove, to the
satisfaction of the Concordia University System Board of
Directors and with the concurrence of the President of
the Synod, to violate the doctrine and practice of the
Synod (Constitution Art. II) or to have caused the
institution to be not in good standing with the Synod
(Bylaw 3.6.6.4.1 [e]), the Concordia University System
Board of Directors and President of the Synod shall
admonish the president to take appropriate action
consistent with the doctrine and practice of the Synod
(Constitution Art. II), and shall invite the respective
board of regents and the district president thereon to
join in said admonishment.
(c) Should repeated admonition prove futile, the
Concordia University System Board of Directors may, by
an affirmative vote of two-thirds of its current members,
resolve that the president is unfit to serve as spiritual
head of the college or university and so inform the
respective board of regents, which shall remove him
from office forthwith.
F. TO REVISE BYLAWS GOVERNING CONCORDIA
UNIVERSITY FACULTIES
Rationale
In keeping with the charge of 2019 Res. 7-03 to “strengthen all
CUS institutions’ connection to the Synod” and in light of
other changes made above, minor revisions to bylaws dealing
with the college and university faculties are required. Changes
in higher education and in the role of the faculties in the
broader work of the Synod have reduced the degree to which
the Bylaws of the Synod should or can direct specifics of what
are ordinarily internal personnel matters of colleges and
universities. In keeping with the general philosophy of the
proposal, detailed specifications have been eliminated in
favor of allowing boards of regents more flexibility while
maintaining Synod’s specific interests through the CUS
ecclesiastical visitation.
Resolutions