Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2023 · 68th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 188

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 2023, Page 188

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

7. UNIVERSITY EDUCATION
using a ballot containing only the current president’s
name, the board of regents shall vote, the majority action
of the board of regents being required to extend the
president’s term for an additional five years.
(1) In addition to considering the evaluation report,
the board of regents shall as part of its review consult
with the President of the Synod and the chairman of
the Board of Directors of Concordia University
System.
(2) The regents may consult with other boards,
commissions, and councils of the Synod as they deem
wise.
(d) In the event that a president’s term is not renewed,
the office of the president shall be considered vacant as
of the end of the term of the incumbent.
(e) A president who is on a roster of the Synod is under
the ecclesiastical supervision of the Synod. In the event a
member is removed from membership in the Synod
pursuant to procedure established in these Bylaws, then
that member is also considered removed from the
position held and shall be terminated forthwith by the
board of regents.
(f) A president who is not on the roster of the Synod
shall be a member of a member congregation of the
Synod. He shall be subject to ecclesiastical supervision as
to doctrine, life, and administration of office, by the
respective geographic district president. He shall, for
actions contrary to the confession of Constitution Art. II
or persistence in offensive conduct, after previous futile
admonition, be subject to the process of Bylaw section
2.14 as if he were a member of the Synod. Should he be
suspended and not contest the suspension, or the
suspension be upheld by a hearing panel and/or final
hearing panel, he shall be considered removed from the
position held and shall be terminated forthwith by the
board of regents.
3.10.6.68.2The following process shall govern the selection of
a college/university president.
(a) When a vacancy or an impending vacancy in the
office of president is known, the board of regents shall
inform the campus constituencies, the Board of
Directors of Concordia University System, the President
of the Synod, an official periodical of the Synod, and
other parties as appropriate. If a vacancy in a presidency
occurs, the board of regents shall appoint an interim
president, who shall meet the qualifications established
for the office of president. He shall bear the title “interim
president” and may not serve more than eighteen (18)
months without the concurrence of the President of the
Synod. Such interim appointee shall be ineligible to
serve on a permanent basis without the concurrence of
the President of the Synod.
(21) The board of regents shall requestinitiate that
the Board of Directors of Concordia University System
schedule a transition review of the campus, which
shall include consultation with Concordia University
System on the basis of the Lutheran Identity and
Mission Outcomes Standards and the institution’s
most recent affirmation review. The review is to
188 | PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2023 (68TH) LCMS CONVENTION

provide a report on the state of the campus for use by
the search committee, the board of regents, and the
candidates.
(12) The board of regents shall request that the Board
of Directors of Concordia University System authorize
the institution to, on the basis of the above
consultation, compose and, with the concurrence of
CUS, publish a request for nominations for the
position of president.
…
3.10.6.8.3 The president, in his service as spiritual head of the
college or university, shall be ecclesiastically reviewed by
the Concordia University System.
(a) The Concordia University System Board of Directors
may call up for formal review any action or inaction of
the president that, in its view, may be in violation of the
doctrine or practice of the Synod (Constitution Art. II) or
to have caused the institution to be not in good standing
with the Synod (Bylaw 3.6.6.4.1 [e]). Such review may be
requested of the president himself or of the president
and the respective board of regents.
(b) Should the action or inaction prove, to the
satisfaction of the Concordia University System Board of
Directors and with the concurrence of the President of
the Synod, to violate the doctrine and practice of the
Synod (Constitution Art. II) or to have caused the
institution to be not in good standing with the Synod
(Bylaw 3.6.6.4.1 [e]), the Concordia University System
Board of Directors and President of the Synod shall
admonish the president to take appropriate action
consistent with the doctrine and practice of the Synod
(Constitution Art. II), and shall invite the respective
board of regents and the district president thereon to
join in said admonishment.
(c) Should repeated admonition prove futile, the
Concordia University System Board of Directors may, by
an affirmative vote of two-thirds of its current members,
resolve that the president is unfit to serve as spiritual
head of the college or university and so inform the
respective board of regents, which shall remove him
from office forthwith.
F. TO REVISE BYLAWS GOVERNING CONCORDIA
UNIVERSITY FACULTIES
Rationale
In keeping with the charge of 2019 Res. 7-03 to “strengthen all
CUS institutions’ connection to the Synod” and in light of
other changes made above, minor revisions to bylaws dealing
with the college and university faculties are required. Changes
in higher education and in the role of the faculties in the
broader work of the Synod have reduced the degree to which
the Bylaws of the Synod should or can direct specifics of what
are ordinarily internal personnel matters of colleges and
universities. In keeping with the general philosophy of the
proposal, detailed specifications have been eliminated in
favor of allowing boards of regents more flexibility while
maintaining Synod’s specific interests through the CUS
ecclesiastical visitation.
Resolutions