Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2023 · 68th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 162

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 2023, Page 162

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

6. PASTORAL MINISTRY AND SEMINARIES
remains apparent “confusion regarding the definition of
‘specific ministry’” (2013 Res. 5-04B, Proc., 139–40) among
members of Synod; and

Resolved, That the SMP route be utilized only for its
intended purposes (2007 Res. 5-01B; Bylaw 2.13.1) and
strengthened under the following principles and boundaries:

WHEREAS, The 2007 Synod convention established the
SMP program at both seminaries to develop pastors for
“specific ministries” which “include such categories as church
planter, staff pastor, and others as needs arise” (2007 Res. 501B, Proc., 133–38). 2013 Res. 5-04B went on to clarify that “the
authority over admission to and administration of the SMP
program remains with the seminaries while the respective
district president remains responsible for determining the
appropriateness of the specific ministry.” This resolution also
resolved “[t]hat district presidents not approve specific
ministry sites which could reasonably be expected to support
a general pastor or sites where a minister of religion—
commissioned could fulfill the duties”; and

1. SMP pastors and their ministries are valid, appropriate
to the current needs of Christ’s Body in certain
circumstances, fruitful, and treasured by all, even as
the Synod gives thanks to God for such men prepared,
called, and placed into the Office of the Holy Ministry
under this particular Synod route to ordination;

WHEREAS, Candidates for the SMP program do not apply
for the program in isolation, but are raised up by
congregations for service. As such, there must be a specific
ministry identified before the application is submitted. The
applying congregation that intends to call the SMP applicant
once he is certified should formally indicate its desire to do so
(a congregation vote is recommended). A mentor and a
vicarage supervisor must be identified and agree to fill these
roles for the application to be processed. Finally, the district
president in whose district the applicant will serve must
endorse the applicant for the specific ministry where he will
serve; and
WHEREAS, It is the desire of the Council of Presidents
(COP) that the LCMS Office of Pastoral Education, Concordia
Theological Seminary, Concordia Seminary, and the COP
agree on the specific ministry contexts which district
presidents are to use in approving SMP applicants; and
WHEREAS, New, non-approved routes to ministerial
service in the Synod and the performance of the distinctive
functions of the Office of the Holy Ministry are in various
instances being encouraged, conceived, developed, and
offered to individuals who sincerely desire to serve the church;
and
WHEREAS, The 2019 Synod convention adopted
resolutions (Res. 6-02, 03A, Proc., 158–60) that assigned
certain tasks to the Pastoral Formation Committee (as
described in Bylaw 3.10.4) concerning routes to ordination;
therefore be it
Resolved, That the residential Master of Divinity (M.Div.)
route at our Synod seminaries continue to be positioned and
understood as the Synod’s strongly preferred route to
ordination, supplying Synod congregations with well-formed,
highly educated pastors who as members of the Synod
(ministers of religion—ordained, Bylaw 2.6.1) are prepared to
preach, teach, and care for souls over a lifetime of faithful
ministry in any and every context into which the Lord calls
them into service; and be it further
Resolved, That fiscally sound actions be undertaken over
the 2023–26 triennium by the Synod’s residential seminaries
to maintain guaranteed tuition support for all students
enrolled in the residential M.Div. programs; and be it further
162 | PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2023 (68TH) LCMS CONVENTION

2. the SMP route be understood and positioned as the
exception and not become the principal rule with
respect to the Synod’s available routes for the
preparation and ordination of her pastors;
3. that there be no change to the timing of SMP vicarage
and ordination as currently practiced in the Synod and
that biblical languages not become a mandatory part
of SMP pastoral formation;
4. SMP students be consistently addressed as “vicar” in
the first two years of study and not be addressed as
“pastor” until after ordination; and
5. seminaries, districts, congregations, and pastors
consistently encourage and strive to make provisions
for prospective SMP students to consider entering
instead into an M.Div. or Residential Alternate Route
(RAR/AR) program;
and be it further
Resolved, That each Synod approved non-residential route
to ordination remain independent from the other and not
consolidated under the SMP program; and be it further
Resolved, That the seminaries, in consultation with the
Pastoral Formation Committee, retain responsibility for the
academic, admissions, and financial parameters for each
approved non-residential route to ordination in the Synod;
and be it further
Resolved, That those involved in the planning and
implementation of Set Apart to Serve, the Synod’s church work
recruitment initiative, in collaboration with recruitment
officers from the Synod’s two residential seminaries, explore,
develop, and implement means to encourage and assist men
“from every nation, from all tribes and peoples and
languages” (Rev. 7:9) toward residential pastoral formation
through the M.Div. program; and be it further
Resolved, That the Pastoral Formation Committee be
assigned the following tasks, to be completed during the
2023–26 triennium, for inclusion in the 2026 Convention
Workbook:
1. to prepare a report that analyzes and assesses
ministerial or pastoral formation programs that have
emerged within the Synod over the past several years,
especially those preparing persons to perform the
distinctive functions of the Office of the Holy Ministry,
which lack approval of the Synod under its current
Constitution and Bylaws and are not included in the
current list (i.e., M.Div., RAR/AR, Specific Ministry
Resolutions