Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2023 · 68th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 162
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 2023, Page 162
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
6. PASTORAL MINISTRY AND SEMINARIES
remains apparent “confusion regarding the definition of
‘specific ministry’” (2013 Res. 5-04B, Proc., 139–40) among
members of Synod; and
Resolved, That the SMP route be utilized only for its
intended purposes (2007 Res. 5-01B; Bylaw 2.13.1) and
strengthened under the following principles and boundaries:
WHEREAS, The 2007 Synod convention established the
SMP program at both seminaries to develop pastors for
“specific ministries” which “include such categories as church
planter, staff pastor, and others as needs arise” (2007 Res. 501B, Proc., 133–38). 2013 Res. 5-04B went on to clarify that “the
authority over admission to and administration of the SMP
program remains with the seminaries while the respective
district president remains responsible for determining the
appropriateness of the specific ministry.” This resolution also
resolved “[t]hat district presidents not approve specific
ministry sites which could reasonably be expected to support
a general pastor or sites where a minister of religion—
commissioned could fulfill the duties”; and
1. SMP pastors and their ministries are valid, appropriate
to the current needs of Christ’s Body in certain
circumstances, fruitful, and treasured by all, even as
the Synod gives thanks to God for such men prepared,
called, and placed into the Office of the Holy Ministry
under this particular Synod route to ordination;
WHEREAS, Candidates for the SMP program do not apply
for the program in isolation, but are raised up by
congregations for service. As such, there must be a specific
ministry identified before the application is submitted. The
applying congregation that intends to call the SMP applicant
once he is certified should formally indicate its desire to do so
(a congregation vote is recommended). A mentor and a
vicarage supervisor must be identified and agree to fill these
roles for the application to be processed. Finally, the district
president in whose district the applicant will serve must
endorse the applicant for the specific ministry where he will
serve; and
WHEREAS, It is the desire of the Council of Presidents
(COP) that the LCMS Office of Pastoral Education, Concordia
Theological Seminary, Concordia Seminary, and the COP
agree on the specific ministry contexts which district
presidents are to use in approving SMP applicants; and
WHEREAS, New, non-approved routes to ministerial
service in the Synod and the performance of the distinctive
functions of the Office of the Holy Ministry are in various
instances being encouraged, conceived, developed, and
offered to individuals who sincerely desire to serve the church;
and
WHEREAS, The 2019 Synod convention adopted
resolutions (Res. 6-02, 03A, Proc., 158–60) that assigned
certain tasks to the Pastoral Formation Committee (as
described in Bylaw 3.10.4) concerning routes to ordination;
therefore be it
Resolved, That the residential Master of Divinity (M.Div.)
route at our Synod seminaries continue to be positioned and
understood as the Synod’s strongly preferred route to
ordination, supplying Synod congregations with well-formed,
highly educated pastors who as members of the Synod
(ministers of religion—ordained, Bylaw 2.6.1) are prepared to
preach, teach, and care for souls over a lifetime of faithful
ministry in any and every context into which the Lord calls
them into service; and be it further
Resolved, That fiscally sound actions be undertaken over
the 2023–26 triennium by the Synod’s residential seminaries
to maintain guaranteed tuition support for all students
enrolled in the residential M.Div. programs; and be it further
162 | PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2023 (68TH) LCMS CONVENTION
2. the SMP route be understood and positioned as the
exception and not become the principal rule with
respect to the Synod’s available routes for the
preparation and ordination of her pastors;
3. that there be no change to the timing of SMP vicarage
and ordination as currently practiced in the Synod and
that biblical languages not become a mandatory part
of SMP pastoral formation;
4. SMP students be consistently addressed as “vicar” in
the first two years of study and not be addressed as
“pastor” until after ordination; and
5. seminaries, districts, congregations, and pastors
consistently encourage and strive to make provisions
for prospective SMP students to consider entering
instead into an M.Div. or Residential Alternate Route
(RAR/AR) program;
and be it further
Resolved, That each Synod approved non-residential route
to ordination remain independent from the other and not
consolidated under the SMP program; and be it further
Resolved, That the seminaries, in consultation with the
Pastoral Formation Committee, retain responsibility for the
academic, admissions, and financial parameters for each
approved non-residential route to ordination in the Synod;
and be it further
Resolved, That those involved in the planning and
implementation of Set Apart to Serve, the Synod’s church work
recruitment initiative, in collaboration with recruitment
officers from the Synod’s two residential seminaries, explore,
develop, and implement means to encourage and assist men
“from every nation, from all tribes and peoples and
languages” (Rev. 7:9) toward residential pastoral formation
through the M.Div. program; and be it further
Resolved, That the Pastoral Formation Committee be
assigned the following tasks, to be completed during the
2023–26 triennium, for inclusion in the 2026 Convention
Workbook:
1. to prepare a report that analyzes and assesses
ministerial or pastoral formation programs that have
emerged within the Synod over the past several years,
especially those preparing persons to perform the
distinctive functions of the Office of the Holy Ministry,
which lack approval of the Synod under its current
Constitution and Bylaws and are not included in the
current list (i.e., M.Div., RAR/AR, Specific Ministry
Resolutions