Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2023 · 68th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 186

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 2023, Page 186

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

7. UNIVERSITY EDUCATION
the whole” with advisory groups (e.g., a foundation board;
the CUS board) to seek input, but no votes shall be taken at
such meetingswith such advisory groups present.
3.10.6.4 The board of regents shall be authorized to close
the institution or to sell all or any part of the real property
that constitutes the campus only after receiving the prior
written consent of the Concordia University System Board
of Directors and the Synod Board of Directors, except that
the board of regents may close or finally divest the
institution in the event of legal insolvency necessitating
closure or final divestiture after consultation with the
Synod Board of Directors and the Concordia University
System Board of Directors.
3.10.6.5 The board of regents shall be authorized to
relocate, separate, or divest the institution if and only if
such has been approved under the following procedure,
except in the case of a final divestiture as a result of legal
insolvency (Bylaw 3.10.6.4):
(1) A proposal of relocation, separation, or divesture is
presented to the Synod Board of Directors that specifies
why the proposal is in the interest of the Synod. The
proposal can be made by a board of regents, a committee
of the Synod Board of Directors, or by the Concordia
University System Board of Directors.
(2) Upon such proposal, the Synod Board of Directors
shall require the proposal be developed adequately to
allow determination whether the action proposed is in
the interest of the Synod, for which the board of regents,
the Concordia University System Board of Directors, and
other agencies of the Synod shall in a timely manner
supply all information the Board of Directors deems
necessary.
(3) The Synod Board of Directors shall consult with the
involved board of regents, the Concordia University
System Board of Directors, the Institution Advisory
Council, and the Council of Presidents.
(4) The Synod Board of Directors may negotiate with
the involved board of regents’ terms that are in the
interest of the Synod and the general furtherance of its
higher education mission.
(5) The action is approved by the Synod Board of
Directors by its two-thirds vote and by one of the
following by its two-thirds vote: either by the board of
regents of the institution being relocated, separated, or
divested or by the Concordia University System Board of
Directors.
3.10.6.5.1 Two or more Synod colleges or universities shall be
authorized to consolidate the institutions if and only if such
has been approved under the following procedure:
(1) The boards of regents of the consolidating schools
shall present a detailed consolidation plan to the
Concordia University System Board of Directors and the
Synod Board of Directors. The plan shall be consistent
with the requirements of these Bylaws for a Synod
college or university, except that it may involve a
consolidated board of regents deviating from the
composition specified in Bylaw 3.10.6.2, provided that
the ratio of elected to appointed regents is not decreased
and that all members of the resulting board of regents
186 | PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2023 (68TH) LCMS CONVENTION

are members of member congregations of the Synod.
Such plan must indicate a definite plan of no more than
six years’ duration to bring the composition of the board
of regents of the institution into compliance with Bylaw
3.10.6.2, and continued affirmation shall be contingent
on execution of said plan.
(2) The plan is approved by the Concordia University
System Board of Directors and the Synod Board of
Directors,
(3) The consolidated college or university shall be
regarded as a Concordia University System college or
university.
3.10.6.5.2 The board of regents shall be authorized to
consolidate a non-Synod school into the institution if and
only if a detailed plan of consolidation that is consistent
with Synod Constitution, Bylaws, and resolutions has first
been approved by the Synod Board of Directors by its twothirds vote and by the Concordia University System Board
of Directors by its two-thirds vote.
3.10.6.6 A college or university that is not a Concordia
University System institution may request to join the
Concordia University System. After having consulted with
its Institution Advisory Council, the Concordia University
System Board of Directors may, by its two-thirds vote,
recommend that the college or university join the
Concordia University System. The Concordia University
System recommendation must be submitted either to the
convention of the Synod, which by a majority vote, or the
Synod Board of Directors, which by a two-thirds vote, may
grant membership in Concordia University System. The
Concordia University System recommendations and
subsequent approval shall be subject to all the
requirements and privileges that apply to a Concordia
University System institution, including compliance with
the Synod Constitution, Bylaws, and resolutions, except
that the initial composition of the board of regents may
deviate from that specified in Bylaw 3.10.6.2. Such proposal
must specify a definite plan of no more than six years’
duration to bring the composition of the board of regents of
the institution into compliance with Bylaw 3.10.6.2, and
continued affirmation shall be contingent on execution of
said plan.
E. TO REVISE BYLAWS GOVERNING CONCORDIA
UNIVERSITY PRESIDENTS
Rationale
In keeping with the charge of 2019 Res. 7-03 to “review the
process for selecting presidents of institutions” and to “review
the financial models for the institutions,” the following
bylaws are revised. As with bylaws dealing with the boards of
regents, existing bylaws dealing with institution presidents
call for simplification and updating. The absolutely essential
role of the president as spiritual head of the university is
emphasized, along with his responsibility and accountability
through his board of regents to CUS but also to the Synod.
New mechanisms are put in place for Synod to demand, for
reasons of doctrine and practice, or to advise, for fiscal
reasons, a board of regents to remove a university president.
Resolutions