Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2023 · 68th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 101

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 2023, Page 101

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

the last few centuries. The fundamental aspects are the
following:
1.
2.

Human beings are sinful and indeed enslaved to sin.
We reach our true end or goal in the next life, not the
current one.
The purpose of this life is to love God and serve neighbor.

3.

The broad societal rejection of these three truths of Christ the
wisdom of God has developed in fits and starts, easily here and
against great resistance there, gradually and seemingly
inexorably. As we unpack the ideas that have been adopted in
place of these truths, it will become obvious how we have
arrived in our current state of decay.
Our journey away from wisdom begins in seventeenth-century
Europe. The Thirty Years’ War wracked Europe through most
of the first half of the 1600s. The war was quite worldly, but
because it dealt in great part with a confluence of religious
affiliation with the quest for geopolitical domination, it will
forever be thought of as a war of religion. This combination of
truth claims with widespread destruction left behind a mood in
Europe that was decidedly doubtful about whether religion
was the right place to look for real understanding about the
nature of humanity and the world. The mood among many was
to look elsewhere, and that mood corresponded in time with
the beginning of an age of great scientific discovery and
technological innovation. Hence, the great merger of technical
advancement with spiritual reversal that we now know as the
Enlightenment.
An idea that began to take hold during this era was that
humanity is not fallen or enslaved to sin, but rather is basically
good. As the eighteenth-century Genevan philosopher JeanJacques Rousseau described, 8 man in his primitive state of
nature is good, loving self only in the sense of meeting his own
needs, having natural impulses of justice and of compassion for
others, and possessing perfectibility. It is only through the
corrupting influence of civilized society, and especially of
private property, that man has become duplicitous and
ruthless. Reformed author Carl Trueman, whose work The Rise
and Triumph of the Modern Self I highly recommend,
summarizes Rousseau’s view this way: Man is “at his best—he
is most truly himself as he should be—when he acts in
accordance with his nature.” 9 It is difficult to overstate how
broadly and deeply this idea of basic human goodness has
penetrated the modern consciousness. 10
This denial of bondage to sin is really denial of Christ the
wisdom of God. And while the denial of bondage to sin poses a
grave danger to one’s soul, at the societal level it can also have
devastating effects in the here and now. We see those effects all
around us, as Dr. Trueman aptly describes. 11 Because our nature
is widely seen as good, self-restraint is seen as unhealthy or
hypocritical, while self-indulgence and embracing one’s
Jean-Jacques Rousseau, (On the) Equality Among Mankind
(Hoboken, N.J.: Generic NL Freebook Publisher, 2000).
9
Carl R. Trueman, The Rise and Triumph of the Modern Self
(Wheaton, Ill.: Crossway, 2020), 123.
10
For more on the ideas and influence of Rousseau, see Trueman,
116–28, and Frederick Copleston, A History of Philosophy, Vol. VI
(London: Search Press Limited, 1960), 65–69.
8

Convention Essays

impulses are celebrated as authentic. Because society breeds
falsity, societal constraints on morality are distrusted, while
defining oneself according to one’s feelings is the highest good
and must be respected at all costs. The resulting disorder, and
ultimately the persecution of those who would seek to bring
order under God’s Law, is unsurprising to anyone who knows
the depravity of the human soul.
If, as asserted by Rousseau and so many other thinkers since the
eighteenth century, humanity is good but societal influences
are evil, then it would make sense that earthly life could become
paradisical if only we could correct the societal forces. There
would be nothing about humanity itself that would prevent an
earthly paradise. And so, the last three centuries have
witnessed one urgent quest after another to engineer society
into a perfection that allows humanity to enter into bliss. This
is not the heavenly bliss of eternity with Christ, of course; it is
earthly bliss. And this is the second rejection of a fundamental
aspect of Christ the wisdom of God—the rejection of the notion
that our ultimate destination, our ultimate joy, is to be found
not in this life, but the next.
Perhaps the most famous and societally destructive philosophy
that aims toward earthly bliss belongs to Karl Marx. He saw
private property as the fundamental evil plaguing humanity
and preventing the realization of universal bliss. If there were
no private property, there would be no want. Neither would we
have need of any exclusivity (such as marriage) that leads to
jealousy, nor would we need religion to help us to feel better
because we would already feel better, since there would be no
material or social alienation. The solution, then, is for the
working class to overthrow the owners of property and
factories and such. Eventually the government will wither
away from lack of use, and all people will live in the harmony of
communism. 12
Tens of millions of people have died around the globe because
of the pursuit of this unattainable chimera of universal peace,
of earthly bliss. They have died because people have exchanged
their eternal inheritance in Christ the wisdom of God for the
bowl of pottage that is communist bliss. And we should not
imagine that Marx’s ideas have no purchase here, for whereas
he focused on dismantling the economic system, others in the
last 100 years have applied his ideas instead to dismantling
sexual ethics, dismantling the family and even dismantling
language. Essentially, any distinction that could be perceived
as placing one group above another is subject to destruction—
or as the sanitized vocabulary has it, deconstruction. 13 We must
not delude ourselves: American society has embraced the quest
for earthly bliss, and much of the aggressiveness of the
movement toward moral disorder is explicable in this way.
Those of us who are in Christ the wisdom of God, living out our
baptismal pilgrimages toward our ultimate home in the next
Trueman, The Rise and Triumph, 124–28.
For an incisive and brief treatment of Marx’s philosophy, see
Frederick Copleston, A History of Philosophy, Vol. VII (London: Search
Press Limited, 1963), 305–34.
13
Trueman, The Rise and Triumph, 232–36. See also Helen
Pluckrose and James Lindsay, Cynical Theories (Durham, N.C.:
Pitchstone Publishing, 2020).
11

12

PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2023 (68TH) LCMS CONVENTION | 101