Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2007 · 63rd Convention, Houston › Page 381

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2007, Page 381

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Page 395 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Page 399 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Page 410 Page 411 Page 412 Page 413 Page 414 Page 415 Page 416 Page 417 Page 418 Page 419 Page 420 Page 421 Page 422 Page 423 Page 424 Page 425 Page 426 Page 427 Page 428 Page 429

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

THEOLOGICAL DOCUMENTS—COMMISSION ON THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS 381

Christian Faith and
Human Beginnings

Christian Care and
Pre-implantation Human Life

Introduction

Pastor Solomon was having an interesting week. His calendar
showed that Rachel and James were due to meet with him next Mon-
day. Their physician was recommending that they try in vitro fer-
tilization (IVF), since other treatments for their infertility had failed.
They wanted Pastor Solomon to help them think about the moral
and spiritual implications of this recommendation. A local pro-life
group had also called with questions about stem cell research and
had pointed him to some arguments that claimed that IVF clinics
were failing to respect human life in ways very similar to abortion
clinics. The main argument was that “‘life begins at conception.”
IVF clinical practice fertilizes human eggs in a laboratory setting
and often includes decisions not to transfer every one of the fertil-
ized eggs into the woman’s body. Some are frozen for possible fu-
ture transfer and others are discarded. And some that are frozen are
now being destroyed as they become sources for stem cells to be
used in medical and biological research.'

Pastor Solomon had recently been examining end-of-life issues
with the adult Bible class. He had drawn upon the Bible Study in
Christian Care at Life’s End, which made frequent use of the prin-
ciple “Always to care, never to kill.”? He and the class thought that
this principle shed useful light on care for humans at the end of life.
Pastor Solomon found himself wondering whether this line of
thought could help him with the beginning-of-life issues that he was
now encountering.

Pastor Solomon first tried using this principle to examine care
for human life in the womb. In the womb we find fragile and vul-
nerable human lives on their way to birth into human families and
community. Pastor Solomon was encouraged that “Always to care,
never to kill” seemed to sum up familiar Christian teaching con-
cerning protection and care for lives in the womb.

His current questions, however, were not about life in the womb
but about fertilized eggs in IVF clinics, and particularly about those
that were not being transferred into a woman’s womb. “Always to
care, never to kill” certainly sums up a Christian’s attitude to the
human lives that are given to us. And fertilized eggs are human.
Pastor Solomon recognized that most thoughtful participants in
these debates about the beginnings of life outside the womb in lab-
oratories readily admitted that the coming together of sperm and
egg was a crucial step in the beginning of a human life. The debates
were not about whether conception began a human life but about
whether human life that is never implanted in the womb comes un-
der the principle “Always to care, never to kill” in the same way
that life developing in the womb and beyond does.

Pastor Solomon had often studied and used the various Scrip-
ture passages that speak of God’s regard for His people’s lives not
only before we were in the womb (for example, Jer. 1:5) but even
from before the foundation of the world (Eph. 1:4). Those passages
certainly settle the question of whether baptized children of God
should thankfully confess God’s knowledge and love of them from
long before the coming together of sperm and egg that began their
physical development. But he had also discovered that Christian
theologians are not of one mind concerning whether these same pas-
sages also speak about every fertilized egg, including the many that
in the natural course of procreation or in the clinic are never suc-
cessfully implanted in a mother’s womb.

Pastor Solomon was confident that human life, implanted in a
mother’s womb, was to be nurtured and loved, and he knew how to
counsel and teach about this topic with his people. But now Rachel

and James and a local pro-life group were asking him for advice
about human life in a laboratory Petri dish prior to implantation in
the womb. And so for the last few days he had applied himself again
to Scripture, and he had also begun to become better informed about
IVF clinical practice and about stem cell research and cloning. He
began to review the broad range of arguments currently employed
in the debates that both Christians and non-Christians are having
about the moral and spiritual significance of pre-implantation fer-
tilized eggs. His goal was to understand when and how a newly be-
gun human life comes to be regarded by God (and therefore also by
us) as a life to be nurtured and loved unconditionally.

Our fictional Pastor Solomon’s situation is the one that the Com-
mission on Theology and Church Relations found itself in as it ap-
plied itself to the assignment to provide guidance on questions about
embryonic stem cell research and cloning for biomedical research.
In this report we seek to help Christians become better informed
about the science and clinical practice of IVF, genetic research, and
cloning. We also survey the wide range of ethical arguments that
are being brought to bear on these issues. In the final part of this re-
port we return to Pastor Solomon and consider how the principle
“Always to care, never to kill” is applicable to questions about hu-
man beginnings.

Overview: The Riddle of Human Beginnings

In vitro fertilization (IVF), embryonic stem cell research, and
cloning technology require that Christians, along with other con-
cerned and thoughtful individuals, return to fundamental questions
concerning what it is (o be a human whom God loves and whom
God would have us love and nurture. The development of genetic
science and technology is having the beneficial effect of challeng-
ing Christians to redouble their efforts to mine God’s Word and to
seek to discern God’s will in the face of the new questions and pos-
sibilities that are being raised each day. There is disagreement not
only within contemporary culture but also among Christians on
questions about whether and how pre-implantation embryonic cells
in laboratories should be accorded protection rather than being dis-
carded in clinics or destroyed or compromised by research.*

Consider an example of challenging disagreement among
thoughtful Christians and others. In July 2002 the United States
President’s Council on Bioethics issued a report on Human Cloning
and Human Dignity: An Ethical Inquiry.’ Robert George, a Prince-
ton ethicist, is a member of the Council and a staunch advocate of
the position that embryos outside the womb in clinics and labora-
tories—whether the result of combining sperm and egg or the re-
sult of cloning technology—are to be accorded protection on the
same basis as live-born humans. He reports that while the 17 mem-
bers of the Council unanimously voted to oppose reproductive
cloning,® they divided 10 to 7 on a proposal for a four-year mora-
torium on cloning to produce human embryos for biomedical re-
search. Of the 10 in favor of a moratorium, 7 argued for an
immediate and permanent legal prohibition of cloning embryos for
biomedical research. The other 3 in favor of the moratorium argued
that while such cloning might be permissible, more time was needed
for reflection and debate. Among the 7 who argued for an immedi-
ate and permanent prohibition, some (like Robert George) argued
that embryos in clinics and laboratories are to be accorded protec-
tion on the same basis as live-born humans. Others among the 7,
however, were not convinced that the argument for prohibition
could or should be based on a claim that embryos should be ac-
corded protection on the same basis as live-born humans.’

In March 2004 this same Council issued a report called Repro-
duction and Responsibility: The Regulation of New Biotechnolo-
gies.® Leon Kass, chair of the Council, writes in his personal
statement that “the report’s major contribution is to show how a het-
erogeneous group of individuals, whose opinions range almost as
widely as those of the American people, has agreed on the need to

2007 Convention Workbook