Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2007 · 63rd Convention, Houston › Page 191
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2007, Page 191
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Page 395
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Page 399
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Page 410
Page 411
Page 412
Page 413
Page 414
Page 415
Page 416
Page 417
Page 418
Page 419
Page 420
Page 421
Page 422
Page 423
Page 424
Page 425
Page 426
Page 427
Page 428
Page 429
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
PROGRAM AND FINANCE 191
fit payments, and a $12.5 million administrative budget), increas-
ingly complex decisions are required that affect investments, em-
ployee benefit design, and financial oversight. In addition, general
corporate governance has changed in recent years as a result of fi-
nancial problems in the corporate world, requiring greater finan-
cial oversight by audit committees of boards, resulting in the es-
tablishment of specific requirements for financial literacy for
membership on audit committees; and
WHEREAS, The current structure with seven laypersons with spe-
cialized capabilities no longer provides adequate resources for the
input and review needed from the board members, especially in
committee sessions where much board work is accomplished and
where the specialized capabilities are split between committees that
meet concurrently. When board members’ schedules force them to
miss a meeting, multi-million dotlar benefit or investment decisions
end up being made in committee sessions by possibly only two
members of the board; and
WuereEAas, Concordia Plan Services and Worker Benefit Plans
believe that adding more laypersons with specialized benefit, in-
vestment, and finance/audit experience would greatly enhance its
board’s ability to function more effectively; and
WHEREAS, At its September 2006 meeting, a resolution was
adopted to request the 2007 LCMS convention to amend paragraph
3.7.1.2 of the Bylaws to add three additional laypersons to the mem-
bership of the board, such laypersons to be appointed by the Board of
Directors of the Synod (as are all other board members); and
WHEREAS, This change would necessitate amendments to the
LCMS Bylaws and various Concordia Plans and Pension Plan for
Pastors and Teachers documents, a resolution was proposed by the
Board of Directors—Concordia Plan Services and Board of Man-
agers—Worker Benefit Plans to obtain the support of the Board of
Directors of the Synod for the change; and
WHEREAS, The LCMS Board of Directors at its November 2006
meeting adopted a resolution supporting the Board of Directors of
Concordia Plan Services’ and the Board of Managers of Worker
Benefit Plans’ request to have the 2007 LCMS convention to
amend paragraph 3.7.1.2 of the Bylaws to add three additional
laypersons to the membership of the board, such laypersons to be
appointed by the Board of Directors of the Synod (as are all other
board members); therefore be it
Resolved, That the Synod in convention amend Bylaw 3.7.1.2
of the Handbook as follows
3.7.1.2 The Board of Menegere Directors of Werker-Beneht
PlansConcordia Plan Services shall consist of 40-13 voting members
appointed by the Board of Directors of the Synod and the Vice-Presi-
dent-Finance—Treasurer of the Synod as a nonvoting member. The +0
13 voting members shall include:
1. Two parish pastors
2. One teacher
3. Seven Ten laypersons, at least areefour of whom shall be expe-
rienced in the design of employee benefit plans, at least four of
whom shall be and-the-ethersinexperienced in the management
of benefit plan investments, and at least one of whom shall have
ignifi fi iaV/aud
it experience.
Commission on Structure
4-03
To Refine Funding the Mission Report
re Church Growth and Stewardship
Whereas, The Blue Ribbon Task Force for Funding the Mis-
sion has submitted its report as called for by Res. 4-07 of the 2004
convention of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod; and
WHEREAS, It is obvious that the task force has spent much time
on formulating this document, and
WHEREAS, The document “Report of the Blue Ribbon Task
Force for Funding the Mission” has certain theological reflections
on stewardship that are seemingly contradictory, such as Part C,
Item 5, which indicates that giving is a discipline, while Part C,
Item 9, indicates that giving is based on emotions; and
WHEREAS, There is some confusion as to what our task is,
namely in Part C, task force Recommendation 2 regarding evange-
lism states, “It is time to grow this Church.” Yet we also maintain
that the conversion of sinners into saints is the work of the Holy
Spirit as He pleases (cf. AC V, XIII; 1 Cor. 12:3b) through the
preaching of the Word and the Sacrament of Holy Baptism, so that
the growth of the Church is in the hands of the Holy Spirit; and
WHEREAS, In spite of the command of Jesus to “love one an-
other as I have loved you” (John 13:34), and our Synod’s mission
statement that states, “...the mission of the LCMS is vigorously to
make known the love of Christ by word and deed within our
churches...,” individuals and congregations within our Synod have
been battling internally, wasting resources that could have been
better used to spread the Good News, thereby giving poor witness
in deed to what we have been saying; and
WHEREAS, The report recommends in Part E, Recommendations
8-11, implementing even more fund-raising strategies when what
is really needed is a return to solid biblical stewardship of life prin-
ciples; and :
WHEREAS, The recommendation to assess fees to RSO organi-
zations and congregations is a turn toward legalistic assessment
principles, and would result in increased fund-raising efforts by
RSOs and higher costs for operating schools and districts, which
will be by necessity passed on to the parishioners-in-the-pew, who
are struggling with generally rising costs, including energy costs,
Concordia Plans, and salaries, or which may result in further re-
ductions of unrestricted support of the Synod; therefore be it
Resolved, That the Board of Directors of the South Dakota Dis-
trict of the Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod thank the Task
Force on Funding the Mission for its work; and be it further
Resolved, That the document “Funding the Mission” be sent
back to the task force for further work refining the language re-
garding the work of the Holy Spirit in the efforts to “grow the
Church”; and be it further
Resolved, That the task force be advised to focus its energies on
the development of a plan for the education of every member in
sound biblical, whole-life stewardship; and be it finally
Resolved, That the recommendations for fees for RSO organi-
zations and congregations be entirely rejected as an incursion into
business methods, entirely out of place in a church body that is
focused on spreading the Good News of Jesus Christ.
Board of Directors
South Dakota District
4-04
To Clarify Status of Seminaries in “Funding
the Mission” Proposal
WHEREAS, The report of the Blue Ribbon Task Force for “Funding
the Mission” has called for each Synod corporate entity to contribute
an unspecified portion of its annual budget to the unrestricted fund
budget of the Synod (pp. 18-19), and for each Recognized Service
Organization to be assessed a “partnership fee” based on its annual
budget to support the unrestricted budget of the Synod (pp. 19-20),
and for each congregation that does not meet unspecified financial
expectations through its voluntary offerings to eventually be assessed
an unspecified “fee for services” (p. 21); and
WHEREAS, The report clearly indicates that the colleges and uni-
versities of the Concordia University System shall be expected to
remit an unspecified*Portion of their budget to the unrestricted fund
budget of the Synod (pp. 18-19), but does not specifically indicate
how the seminaries of the Synod fit into this scheme since they are
not members of the CUS, nor are they the Synod’s corporate enti-
ties, RSOs, or congregations; and
WuerEas, In recent years, the Synod’s unrestricted budget has
provided 1 to 2 percent of the budget of the seminaries; and
WHEREAS, At previous Synod conventions, overtures have been
offered to encourage the Synod to restore a substantial subsidiza-
tion of the seminaries’ budgets; and