Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2001 · 61st Convention › Page 425
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2001, Page 425
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Sheet 142
Sheet 143
Sheet 144
Sheet 145
Sheet 146
Sheet 147
Sheet 148
Page 2
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Page 395
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Page 399
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Page 410
Page 411
Page 412
Page 413
Page 414
Page 415
Page 416
Page 417
Page 418
Page 419
Page 420
Page 421
Page 422
Page 423
Page 424
Page 425
Page 426
Page 427
Page 428
Page 429
Page 430
Page 431
Page 432
Page 433
Page 434
Page 435
Page 436
Page 437
Page 438
Page 439
Page 440
Page 441
Page 442
Page 443
Page 444
Page 445
Page 446
Page 447
Page 448
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 452
Page 453
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Page 458
Page 459
Page 460
Page 461
Page 462
Page 463
Page 464
Page 465
Page 466
Page 467
Page 468
Page 469
Page 470
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
ADDITIONAL THEOLOGICAL DOCUMENTS AND REPORTS—OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT 425
demptrix with Christ, co-mediatrix with Christ, and intercessor for
the church. While many Roman Catholic theologians disagree
strongly with this movement, if the Pope takes this action, it would
bind the consciences of the Catholic faithful and belief would be
required for salvation. It is safe to say that such a move would show
how little has really changed in Catholic doctrine, how much di-
rectly related to the Gospel still remains dividing Lutherans from
Catholics and how superficial the “Joint Declaration” is in its treat-
ment of the issues related to the doctrine of justification
4. These statements appear to be without any meaning whatso-
ever. The fuzzy language found throughout the “Joint Declaration”
will be taken up later in this Evaluation, under the heading, “‘defi-
ciencies.”
5. This shift towards Scripture also, unfortunately, had unto-
ward and lamentable results, as many Catholic biblical scholars
took leadership in fostering and promoting the harmful effects of
historical criticism.
6. It deals only with passages in which the word dikaiao in its
various forms is used. This is far too narrow, since, in Lutheran un-
derstanding, the doctrine of justification is far broader than merely
this legal, forensic term, as importune as that may be. An honest
and full discussion of the doctrine of justification, although this is
admittedly impossible in a summary document such as the “Joint
Declaration,” must include all the biblical language embraced by
the articulus stantis et cadentis ecclesiae and cannot be so intoler-
ably restricted as the “Joint Declaration” does, for all the terms (re-
demption, reconciliation, giving life, light, birth, and many others)
substantiate the central themes of the doctrine of justification: That
God is favorable to sinners solely by grace, solely on account of
Christ, solely through faith, without works of the law. Thus, this
document gives the false impression that Lutherans are only con-
cerned about dikaioo. This is not true. We are concerned about all
the beautiful biblical ways to say the chief article.
7. In Latin, per fidem. Of course, Lutherans also often used the
phrase “by faith” with virtually the same meaning. When they said
it this way, however, it was also made clear that faith in this case
points toward its Object, Jesus Christ. In other words, faith justi-
fies because of its Object, not because of itself, or of anything in us.
8. Often called an organon leiptikon, that is, a receiving organ,
in order to emphasize the passivity of the believer in his justifica-
tion.
9. In fact, tellingly, one of the sections (4.3) is titled, “Justifica-
tion by Faith and through Grace.” This seems to suggest faith as
the cause of our justification and grace as the means. One hesitates
to quibble about language, but this is, after all, a theological docu-
ment and one should expect a higher degree of precision than one
finds here.
!0. Emphasis added.
11. Perhaps the true attitude of the “Joint Declaration” toward
the historic condemnations is revealed by the gratuitous statement:
“Some were not simply pointless” (42). Does this mean that some
(or many) of the condemnations were pointless?
12. Only with great difficulty does one avoid the conclusion that
the “Joint Declaration” is being disingenuous with the reader. This
kind of statement, so obviously misleading, does justice neither to
the historic documents of the 16th century, nor to genuine attempts
at understanding today.
Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification
1997
Preamble
1. The doctrine of justification was of central importance for the
Lutheran Reformation of the sixteenth century. It was held to be
the “first and chief article”(1) and at the same time the “ruler and
judge over all other Christian doctrines.”(2) The doctrine of justifi-
cation was particularly asserted and defended in its Reformation
shape and special valuation over against the Roman Catholic
Church and theology of that time, which in turn asserted and de-
fended a doctrine of justification of a different character. From the
Reformation perspective, justification was the crux of all the dis-
putes. Doctrinal condemnations were put forward both in the
Lutheran Confessions(3) and by the Roman Catholic Church’s
Council of Trent. These condemnations are still valid today and
thus have a church-dividing effect.
2. For the Lutheran tradition, the doctrine of justification has
retained its special status. Consequently it has also from the begin-
ning occupied an important place in the official Lutheran-Roman
Catholic dialogue.
3. Special attention should be drawn to the following reports:
“The Gospel and the Church” (1972)(4) and “Church and Justifi-
cation” (1994)(5) by the Lutheran-Roman Catholic Joint Commis-
sion, “Justification by Faith” (1983)(6) of the Lutheran-Roman
Catholic dialogue in the USA, and The Condemnations of the Re-
formation Era—Do They Still Divide? (1986)(7) by the Ecumeni-
cal Working Group of Protestant and Catholic theologians in Ger-
many. Some of these dialogue reports have been officially received
by the churches. An important example of such reception is the
binding response of the United Evangelical-Lutheran Church of
Germany to the Condemnations study, made in 1994 at the highest
possible level of ecclesiastical recognition together with the other
churches of the Evangelical Church in Germany.(8)
4. In their discussion of the doctrine of justification, all the dia-
logue reports as well as the responses show a high degree of agree-
ment in their approaches and conclusions. The time has therefore
come to take stock and to summarize the results of the dialogues
on justification so that our churches may be informed about the
overall results of this dialogue with the necessary accuracy and
brevity, and thereby be enabled to make binding decisions.
5. The present Joint Declaration has this intention: namely, to
show that on the basis of their dialogue the subscribing Lutheran
churches and the Roman Catholic Church(9) are now able to artic-
ulate a common understanding of our justification by God’s grace
through faith in Christ. It does not cover all that either church
teaches about justification; it does encompass a consensus on basic
truths of the doctrine of justification and shows that the remaining
differences in its explication are no longer the occasion for doctri-
nal condemnations.
6. Our Declaration is not a new, independent presentation
alongside the dialogue reports and documents to date, let alone a
replacement of them. Rather, as the appendix of sources shows, it
makes repeated reference to them and their arguments.
7. Like the dialogues themselves, this Joint Declaration rests on
the conviction that in overcoming the earlier controversial ques-
tions and doctrinal condemnations, the churches neither take the
condemnations lightly nor do they disavow their own past. On the
contrary, this Declaration is shaped by the conviction that in their
respective histories our churches have come to new insights. De-
velopments have taken place which not only make possible, but
also require the churches to examine the divisive questions and
condemnations and see them in a new light.
1. Biblical Message of Justification
8. Our common way of listening to the Word of God in Scrip-
ture has led to such new insights. Together we hear the Gospel that
“God so Joved the world that he gave his only Son, so that every-
one who believes in him may not perish but may have eternal life”
(John 3:16). This good news is set forth in Holy Scripture in vari-
ous ways. In the Old Testament we listen to God’s Word about
human sinfulness (Psalm 51:1—5; Daniel 9:5f.; Ecclesiastes/Qo-
heleth 8:9f.; Ezra 9:6f.) and human disobedience (Genesis 3:1—19;
Nehemiah 9:1 6f., 26) as well as of God’s “righteousness” (Isaiah
2001 Convention Workbook