Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2001 · 61st Convention › Page 41
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2001, Page 41
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Sheet 142
Sheet 143
Sheet 144
Sheet 145
Sheet 146
Sheet 147
Sheet 148
Page 2
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Page 395
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Page 399
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Page 410
Page 411
Page 412
Page 413
Page 414
Page 415
Page 416
Page 417
Page 418
Page 419
Page 420
Page 421
Page 422
Page 423
Page 424
Page 425
Page 426
Page 427
Page 428
Page 429
Page 430
Page 431
Page 432
Page 433
Page 434
Page 435
Page 436
Page 437
Page 438
Page 439
Page 440
Page 441
Page 442
Page 443
Page 444
Page 445
Page 446
Page 447
Page 448
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 452
Page 453
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Page 458
Page 459
Page 460
Page 461
Page 462
Page 463
Page 464
Page 465
Page 466
Page 467
Page 468
Page 469
Page 470
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
SYNODICAL REPORTS 41
KFUO/FCC Matter: Closure
The KFUO/Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod/FCC federal lit-
igation concluded in 1998 with complete victory and tota! vindica-
tion for KFUO and The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod. Initi-
ated in 1990 by the National Association for the Advancement of
Colored People and joined by the Federal Communications Com-
mission, the case charged KFUO with religious discrimination for
giving hiring preference to Christians and Lutheran Christians. In
April 1998, upheld on appeal in December 1998, the courts decided
entirely in favor of KFUO and the Synod. The courts also declared
the FCC’s Equal Employment Opportunity rules to be unconstitu-
tional. KFUO’s long-standing broadcast record was completely
cleared, and its radio licenses were renewed for a full term, until
2005.
In a postscript, the FCC reinstated its EEO rules again in 1999.
In January 2001, the federal courts again declared them unconsti-
tutional.
KFUO and the BCS again want to acknowledge the generous
support of the Marvin M. Schwan Charitable Foundation for sup-
porting the legal defense of KFUO and the religious freedoms guar-
anteed by the U.S. Constitution.
Executive Director
After more than 18 years as the executive director of the Board
for Communication Services, Rev. Dr. Paul W. Devantier left that
post in July 2000 to become chief communications officer for
Bethesda Lutheran Homes and Services, in Watertown, WI. Dr.
Devantier was the first and only executive director the board had
known since it was established by the 1981 Synod convention.
Dr. Devantier’s tenure saw many important developments for
synodical communications. He provided the leadership for the two
accomplishments highlighted above—the successful defense of
KFUO in the FCC case and development of the two mass-media
campaigns. During his years at the helm, the department also re-
ceived considerable recognition from peers, professionals, and the
public for the videos it produced, for the Synod’s two official peri-
odicals, and for its broadcast ministry.
The Board for Communication Services thanks God for Dr. De-
vantier, for his gifts, and for the wonderful service he has rendered
to The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod. We pray God’s richest
blessings on him and his family, on his continued service to the
Kingdom, and for much joy in his work at Bethesda.
The board also thanks God for the gift of Rev. J. Thomas La-
packa, who accepted the call to become its executive director and
began work in that capacity in January 2001. Pastor Lapacka brings
considerable experience, vision, insight, and leadership to the com-
munication task given the BCS by the Synod. The board prays our
Lord’s richest blessings also on Pastor Lapacka and his family, that
he will be strengthened in his task and that he will carry out his re-
sponsibilities with joyful confidence in Christ’s gracious presence.
News and Information
The Division of News and Information produces the Synod’s
two official periodicals—The Lutheran Witness and Reporter—and
operates a News Bureau that distributes news and information pri-
marily to internal audiences Synodwide.
The Lutheran Witness magazine is published monthly for the
laymembers of the Synod’s 6,000-plus congregations. As this re-
port is written in February, the magazine has a circulation of some
250,000. Reporter, a monthly newspaper with a circulation of
33,000, targets its news, ideas, and resources to the Synod’s pro-
fessional church workers and to the lay leaders of its congregations.
Through the periodicals, e-mail listservers, personal contacts,
and other available means, the division seeks to provide accurale
and useful information in order to strengthen the Synod’s mission
and ministry.
Accomplishments
* Readers of The Lutheran Witness give the magazine high marks
“for overall appearance, overall content, and its position as a reli-
gious publication.” according to a readership survey conducted in
1999 by Concordia Publishing House. “The Lutheran Witness is
important to its recipients. It tends to be thoroughly read and
should be continued,” said the survey report.
¢ A readership survey conducted tor Reporter in 2000 by The
Qualis Company, a St. Louis-based research firm, found that the
newspaper gets high marks for credibility (94 percent said it is
“always” or “usually” credible). Although only just over a third
(38 percent) of readers said they “frequently find ideas. sugges-
tions, or helps that they use or pass along to others,” only one
other periodical (The Lutheran Witness) of 17 publications tested
in the survey ranked higher on this “uselulness” scale.
¢ Both official periodicals were recognized for excellence by their
peers and other journalism protessionals in three annual competi-
tions sponsored by The Associated Church Press (ACP) since the
last convention report was prepared (in 1998, 1999, and 2000).
The Lutheran Witness won nine ACP awards in three years, in-
cluding first place in 1999 as “Best in Class” among denomina-
tional general-interest magazines. Reporter garnered || awards,
including two third-place awards (in [998 and 1999) in the “Best
in Class” competition for national and international newspapers.
The Lutheran Witess completed a |4-part series on Lutheran
worship. Prepared in cooperation with the Commission on Wor-
ship and titled “Oh, Come, Let Us Worship Him.” this major se-
ries detailed the rich meaning in the various components of the
historic liturgy. At this writing, plans are to make the series avail-
able to congregations and others through the Commission on
Worship in two formats: a complete reprint with Bible-study
questions added, and in a condensed format especially for use in
parish newsletters.
¢ The division’s News Bureau established “LCMSNow.” an e-mail
listserver especially for religion writers and editors on secular
newspapers. Subscriptions are available only upon their request.
LCMSNow currently has 65 journalist-subscribers.
Plans and Challenges
¢ At this writing, the Board for Communication Services, Concor-
dia Publishing House, and the Synod’s Board of Directors are in
discussions aimed at more efficient and cost-effective production
of The Lutheran Witness. The intent is that new efficiencies not
only will allow the magazine to be financially self-supporting. but
also will provide marketing and circulation-system improvements
that will put the magazine into more LCMS homes.
Plans reported in the 1998 Convention Workbook to develop with
CPH a site for The Lutheran Witess on the World Wide Web
were not realized when the Web-developer contracted by CPH
for the project went out of business shortly before the project was
completed. Budget constraints at CPH resulted in the project not
being resurrected at that time. However. the Board for Commu-
nication Services is hopeful that the discussions cited above also
will finally make possible a Lutheran Witness Web site.
Increasing costs and a decline in budget from unrestricted funds
(funds contributed primarily in “Sunday-morning offerings”) led
in 2000 to a SO percent cut in the number of those who receive
Reporter at the Synod’s expense. Because such cost-reducing
measures are only temporary and result in less-ettective synodical
communications, new formats and delivery systems for carrying
Synod-related news are being investigated as additions or alter-
natives to Reporter's tabloid-newspaper format.
Staff of the official periodicals continue to consult with Dr.
Robert Kuhn, chairman of the Church Growth Study Committee,
as to ways in which the periodicals can carry out provisions of
1992 Res. 3-09, “To Address the Church Growth Movement.”
This year’s release of the Committee's report should now make it
2001 Convenuon Workbook