Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2001 · 61st Convention › Page 140

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2001, Page 140

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Sheet 142 Sheet 143 Sheet 144 Sheet 145 Sheet 146 Sheet 147 Sheet 148 Page 2 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Page 395 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Page 399 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Page 410 Page 411 Page 412 Page 413 Page 414 Page 415 Page 416 Page 417 Page 418 Page 419 Page 420 Page 421 Page 422 Page 423 Page 424 Page 425 Page 426 Page 427 Page 428 Page 429 Page 430 Page 431 Page 432 Page 433 Page 434 Page 435 Page 436 Page 437 Page 438 Page 439 Page 440 Page 441 Page 442 Page 443 Page 444 Page 445 Page 446 Page 447 Page 448 Page 449 Page 450 Page 451 Page 452 Page 453 Page 454 Page 455 Page 456 Page 457 Page 458 Page 459 Page 460 Page 461 Page 462 Page 463 Page 464 Page 465 Page 466 Page 467 Page 468 Page 469 Page 470

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

140 CONGREGATIONAL SERVICES

WHEREAS, The PIFs are often made available to voting mem-
bers of calling congregations at call meetings, but the SETs are
often not made available to voting members of calling congrega-
tions at call meetings; therefore be it

Resolved, That we commend the Council of Presidents (COP)
for creating and improving the SET over the years; and be it further

Resolved, That we commend the COP and our seminaries for
gathering a completed SET from each of the pastors in our Synod;
and be it further

Resolved, That we commend the District Presidents and Circuit
Counselors for making completed SETs available to call committee
members: and be it finally

Resolved, That District Presidents, Circuit Counselors, and call
committees make the completed SETs available to voting members
of calling congregations at call meetings.

University
Minneapolis, MN

2-22

To Provide Pastoral Reference
Forms to Calling Congregations

WHEREAS, It is good and salutary that calling congregations be
allowed full information concerning prospective candidates for
calls; and

WHEREAS, The present system does not allow calling congrega-
tions to have full and complete information and also limits a pas-
tor’s opportunity to respond to the District President’s official eval-
uation included in the call lists returned to the calling
congregations; and

WHEREAS, The present system has evolved away from the in-
tent of the synodical Bylaws; therefore be it

Resolved, That the President of The Lutheran Church—Mis-
souri Synod in consultation with the Vice-Presidents of the Synod,
the Synod’s Executive Director for Human Resources, and the Dis-
trict Presidents develop a new Pastoral Reference Form (PRF) to
replace entirely the existing Pastors Information Form (PIF) and
Self Evaluation Too! (SET); and be it further

Resolved, That the PRF consist entirely and only of information
supplied by the pastor himself, with no notes or comments by any
other person; and be it further

Resolved, That provision be made for PRFs to be filled out by
pastors in several ways: online through a Web-based form, by
e-mail, by computer program on disk, or by a typed or handwritten
form; and be it further

Resolved, That at least once every three years every Circuit
Counselor physically make an official on-site visit to each congre-
gation in his Circuit as well as a personal visit with every pastor
on CRM or Emeritus status and prepare a written evaluation of
each of the pastors using a standardized evaluation procedure and
form to be developed by the President of the Synod in consultation
with the Vice-Presidents of the Synod, the Synod’s Executive Di-
rector of Human Resources, and the District Presidents; that this
Pastoral Evaluation Form (PEF) be shared in full with the pastor
being evaluated and signed by him as acknowledgment of the
same; and that he be given opportunity to attach an addendum to
the PEF with his own comments, which will always be included
with the PEF; and be it further

Resolved, That the Circuit Counselor and District President may
mutually agree to have a PEF for a pastor completed in the same
manner by the District President rather than by the Circuit Coun-
selor, always including a physical, official, on-site visit to the con-
gregation or a personal visit with pastors on CRM and Emeritus
status, using the same standardized evaluation procedure and form,
with the PEF shared in full with the pastor being evaluated and
signed by him as acknowledgment of the same, and that he be
given opportunity to attach an addendum to the PEF with his own
comments, which will always be included with the PEF; and be it
further

2001 Convention Workbook

Resolved, That no changes or updates ever be made to a PEF
without a physical, official, on-site visit to the congregation or a
personal visit with pastors on CRM and Emeritus status, using the
standardized evaluation procedure and form, with the PEF shared
in full with the pastor being evaluated and signed by him as ac-
knowledgment of the same, and that he be given opportunity to at-
tach an addendum to the PEF with his own comments, which will
always be included with the PEF; and be it further

Resolved, That in the case of pastors not serving in parish set-
tings the PEF be completed in the same manner by their respective
supervisors; and be it further

Resolved, That PRFs and PEFs be maintained by the Synod’s
Executive Director of Human Resources and always be supplied
without fail upon request to any congregation or other synodical
entity, and that they be withheld only if a pastor has requested the
same or is currently on Restricted Status according to the provi-
sions of the Bylaws; and be it further

Resolved, That pastors may at any time receive from the
Synod’s Executive Director of Human Resources a complete writ-
ten record (with dates) of the congregations or other entities to
which his PRF and PEF have been supplied or denied for the two
reasons stated above; and be it further

Resolved, That PRFs and PEFs be supplied by the Synod’s Ex-
ecutive Director of Human Resources within two weeks of a re-
quest, or, if either the PRF or PEF is unavailable, that the request-
ing congregation or other entity, the pastor, and the Circuit
Counselor be notified within two weeks so that the information can
be made available as quickly as possible; and be if further

Resolved, That no other information, comments. or evaluation
of any type ever be supplied, either in writing or orally, by any syn-
odical or District official, including, but not limited to, District
Presidents and Circuit Counselors; and be it further

Resolved, That this modified system of supplying pastoral in-
formation to congregations be in place no later than July 1, 2002;
and be it finally

Resolved, That all existing PIFs and SETs in any synodical or
District files be destroyed after the modified system is activated,
as determined by the Synod’s Executive Director of Human Re-
sources and no later than July 1, 2002.

Circuit 2 Forum
Ohio District

2-23
To Refer RSO TF Report to BCS

Preamble

The synodical Task Force on Recognized Service Organizations
(RSO) was charged by the 1998 synodical convention to review
the status of the RSOs of the Board for Congregational Services.
Because recent official action of the Evangelical Lutheran Church
in America (ELCA) has diverged from historic Lutheran doctrine,
the task force recommends that secondary schools clearly align
their religious practices to conform to historic LCMS doctrine and
remove from governance and religious academic positions those
affiliated with the ELCA. Schools are given until 2006 to comply
with this directive or they will lose their RSO status.

With regard to administrative and instructional practices, our
Northern Illinois District high schools are in conformity. They are
also supervised by the President of the Northern Illinois District to
assure acceptable practices. Governance documents (constitutions
and by-laws) are in conformity to The Lutheran Church—Missouri
Synod positions.

Because the RSO Task Force report would negatively impact
our Lutheran high schools in varying degrees, the Northern Ilinois
District Board of Directors at their January 29, 2001, meeting,
passed the attached resolution as a memorial to the 2001 synodical
convention. The Board for Congregational Services of The
Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod is asked to further study this
issue, hoping to refine the directives of the task force so as to con-