Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2001 · 61st Convention › Page 289

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2001, Page 289

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Sheet 142 Sheet 143 Sheet 144 Sheet 145 Sheet 146 Sheet 147 Sheet 148 Page 2 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Page 395 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Page 399 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Page 410 Page 411 Page 412 Page 413 Page 414 Page 415 Page 416 Page 417 Page 418 Page 419 Page 420 Page 421 Page 422 Page 423 Page 424 Page 425 Page 426 Page 427 Page 428 Page 429 Page 430 Page 431 Page 432 Page 433 Page 434 Page 435 Page 436 Page 437 Page 438 Page 439 Page 440 Page 441 Page 442 Page 443 Page 444 Page 445 Page 446 Page 447 Page 448 Page 449 Page 450 Page 451 Page 452 Page 453 Page 454 Page 455 Page 456 Page 457 Page 458 Page 459 Page 460 Page 461 Page 462 Page 463 Page 464 Page 465 Page 466 Page 467 Page 468 Page 469 Page 470

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

8. NATIONAL/DISTRICT SYNOD RELATIONS

8-01

To Reject Report of Task Force on National/District
Synod Relations

WuereEasS, The Formula of Concord (Ep X 4) provides for con-
gregational autonomy in matters of adiaphora; and

WHEREAS, Freedom in matters of adiaphora enables a congre-
gation to adapt its mission and ministry to meet the unique needs of
its locale; and

WHEREAS, The changes proposed by the Task Force on Na-
tional/District Synod Relations severely limit congregational au-
tonomy; and

Wuereas, Art. VII of the Constitution provides that the Synod
is not an ecclesiastical government exercising legislative or coer-
cive powers, and with respect to the individual congregation’s right
of self-government the Synod is but an advisory body; therefore be
It

Resolved, That the 2001 convention of the Synod uphold con-
gregational autonomy as set forth in Art. VII of the Constitution so
that matters of adiaphora continue to be determined by the needs of
the local congregation; and be it further

Resolved, That the 2001 convention of the Synod reject the re-
port of the Task Force on National/District Synod Relations; and
be it finally

Resolved, That we exhibit the love Jesus commanded of His dis-
ciples in John 13:34—35 as we work together to find God-pleasing
solutions to matters of concern among members of the Synod.

Messiah
Parker, AZ

8-02

To Decline Preliminary Report of Task Force

WHEREAS, Many of the proposals of the Preliminary Report of
the Task Force on National/Synod Relations seek to alter the rela-
tionship between the congregations in the various Districts of the
Synod and the national body, which will centralize control in the
national offices and officers of the Synod; and

WHEREAS, Such proposals run counter to the guarantees of the
Constitution (Art. VII) that the Synod is advisory and not legisla-
tive; and

Wuereas, Many of the task force proposals will increase the
powers of the synodical structure and diminish the rights of con-
gregations to determine the applicability of synodical resolutions
to their particular circumstances as guaranteed by the Synod Con-
stitution in Art. VII; therefore be it

Resolved, That the Synod in convention decline the recommen-
dations of the special task force; and be it further

Resolved, That specific recommendations of the Preliminary
Report that may have some merit for further consideration be re-
vised and placed in specific overtures for further consideration by
future conventions of the Synod; and be it finally

Resolved, That the members of the task torce be thanked for
their efforts and be released from any further responsibilities.

Our Savior
Plantation, FL

8-03

To Reject TF Report and Notion of Hierarchy

WHEREAS, Jesus said: “You know that those who are regarded
as rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their high officials
exercise authority over them. Not so with you. Instead, whoever
wants to become great among you must be your servant ...” (Mark
10:42-45); and

WHEREAS, The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod has rejected
the notion from the beginning of being a hierarchical church; and

WHEREAS, There is little opportunity in the structure being put
forward by the Task Force for the national church body to listen to
the needs of the local congregations since the flow of information is
strictly from the national level down; and

WHEREAS, When there is little opportunity for listening there is
little opportunity for responding to local situations; therefore be it

Resolved, That The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod con-
serve the wonderful legacy given us from the past by our forefa-
thers in the church; and be it further

Resolved, That the report of the Task Force on National/District
Synod Relations be rejected; and be it finally

Resolved, That we encourage all officers and workers of our na-
tional church body to consider themselves servants in Jesus to as-
sist in the ministries of the various congregations in our Synod.

Grace
Queens Village, NY

8-04

To Reject Each of the
Recommendations of the Task Force

WHEREAS, The proposed recommendations of the Task Force
on National/District Synod Relations seek to greatly expand the
centralized control and authority of the Synod over individual, au-
tonomous congregations; and

WHEREAS, Such expansion of centralized contro] and authority
will increase rather than decrease conflict within the Synod; and

WHEREAS, Such expansion of centralized control and authority
will hinder rather than nurture the conduct of God’s Great Com-
mission on earth through us; and

WHEREAS, Such expansion of centralized control and authority
would abandon our trust in God to lead our individual and au-
tonomous congregations in the mission field and would replace
Him and His leadership with man and man-made dogma; and

WHEREAS, The proposed involuntary dissolution of the English
District ignores prior resolutions of a similar nature made at the
Synod in convention in 1911, 1923, 1935, 1950, 1953, 1956, and
1975, all of which were soundly rejected; and

WHEREAS, The English District has neither requested nor does it
consent to such proposed dissolution; and

WHEREAS, The English District continues to function well, effi-
ciently, and economically in its numerous ministries; and

WuereAS, The involuntary dissolution of the English District
would gouge deep wounds between the English District’s member
congregations and the Synod; and

WHEREAS, On balance, the proposed recommendations of the
task force, if implemented, would harm rather than improve na-
tional/District/congregation Synod relations; therefore be it

Resolved, That the LCMS meeting in convention in St. Louis
in 2001 reject each of the recommendations of the task force as set
forth in its Preliminary Report on National/District Synod Rela-
tions, including, but not limited to, the recommendations to change
the structure and authority of the Synod and to dissolve the English
District.

Grace
Wyoming, MI

8-05

To Remove Proposed Changes from Convention
Consideration

WHEREAS, Art. VII of the Constitution is clear when it says “the
Synod is not an ecclesiastical government exercising legislative or
coercive powers, and with respect to the individual congregation’s
right of self-government it is but an advisory body”; and

2001 Convention Workbook