Collection › Eckhardt's Reallexikon › index › bibelaltestestament

Eckhardt's Homiletisches Reallexikon, 1907–1917

A cumulative subject index to seven Missouri Synod periodicals, compiled by E. (Ernest) Eckhardt (1868–1939) and printed at St. Louis between 1907 and 1917. Under each headword it sets numbered theses, and beside each thesis the places where the periodicals had treated it — by volume and page, running twenty years past the last of Der Lutheraner's own registers. Where the archive holds the volume a citation names, the citation below is a link to that page.

The alphabetical run is here in full, Abendmahl through Wunder, assembled from five scans: two archive.org items, a pair from Google Books that closes what had looked like a gap in the middle of the alphabet, and the archive.org tail. With it are the Beichtreden appendix, Eckhardt's own printed Register, and the separate 1913 treatise Die Schule, bound in with the later volumes and kept here under its own heading.

clear

Headwords are spelled as Eckhardt set them, so the filter folds the differences that would otherwise hide them — Sklaverei finds Sclaverei, Konkordienformel finds Concordienformel. What you see listed is always the printed spelling.

4,478 entries under 828 headwords, carrying 129,203 citations and 2,331 fragments too damaged to read · built 2026-09-16. uncorrected OCR

The German below is machine transcription of the 1907–1917 print (tesseract, Fraktur model) and has not been proof-read against the page. Read it as a finding aid: the citations are what it is for, and a garbled word is a defect of our OCR, not of Eckhardt.

5 entries under bibelaltestestament.

Bibel. —Altes Teſtament

—

c. Die Einteilung in Verſe iſt von Robert Stephan gemacht worden, während er zu Pferde von Paris nach Lyon reiſte. 1551.

AI translation · machine

c. The division into verses was made by Robert Stephanus while riding on horseback from Paris to Lyon. 1551.

No citation printed with this thesis.

vol a, printed page 395 · scan: bub_gb_3EAUAAAAYAAJ/n0395

3. —

3. Das alte Teſtament. die Bücher a. umfaßt 39 Bücher. Früher bildeten Samuelis,Könige und Chronika je ein Buch; b. iſt hebräiſch geſchrieben. Anm. a. Aramäiſche Stellen ſind Eſra 4, 8—6, 18. 7, 12—26. Jer. 10, 1. Dan. 2, 1—7, 28. 1 Moſ. 31, 47. Anm. b. Iſt die Schreibung der hebräiſchen Vokal⸗ punkte ſo alt wie der Text? Luther: Nein. Andere: Ja. Die Vokale hat Gott inſpiriert, wie ſie geAnm. c. ſchrieben wurden (ob mit oder ohne Punkte iſt Neben⸗ ache); c. war ſchon zuſammengeſtellt nach dem babyloniſchen Eril. Die genaue Zeit der Sammlungen wiſſen wir nicht. Anm. a. Die Handſchriften wurden ſorgfältig auf— zewahrt. Anm. b. Die altteſtamentlichen Bücher waren zu Chriſti Zeit unverfälſcht und in derſelben Geſtalt vor⸗ ganden wie noch heute. Es ſind heute nicht weniger und nicht mehr als damals. Zeugnis des Joſephus Luth. 2, 20. Anm.; d. wird eingeteilt 1. bei den Juden in Geſetz, Propheten, Pſalmen. Luk. 24, 44: Sie haben Moſen und die Propheten. Luk. 16, 29. 31; 2. bei uns in Geſchichtsbücher, poetiſche und pro⸗ phetiſche Bücher.

AI translation · machine

3. The Old Testament. a. comprises 39 books. Formerly the books of Samuel, Kings, and Chronicles each formed a single book; b. is written in Hebrew. Note a. Aramaic passages are Ezra 4:8–6:18; 7:12–26. Jer. 10:11. Dan. 2:1–7:28. Gen. 31:47. Note b. Is the writing of the Hebrew vowel points as old as the text? Luther: No. Others: Yes. Note c. God inspired the vowels as they were written (whether with or without points is a secondary matter); c. was already compiled after the Babylonian exile. We do not know the exact time of the collecting. Note a. The manuscripts were carefully preserved. Note b. The Old Testament books were, in Christ's time, unfalsified and present in the same form as still today. There are today neither fewer nor more than there were then. Testimony of Josephus. Luth. 2, 20, note; d. is divided 1. among the Jews into the Law, the Prophets, the Psalms. Luke 24:44: they have Moses and the Prophets. Luke 16:29, 31; 2. among us into historical, poetic, and prophetic books.

vol a, printed page 395 · scan: bub_gb_3EAUAAAAYAAJ/n0395

4. —

4. Der Pentateuch. Das 1. Buch Moſe. Geneſis. Urſprung. Ent⸗ tehung. ö Das 2. Buch Moſe. Exrodus. Auszug aus Ägypten. Das 3. Buch Moſe. Levitikus. Vorſchriften über le— itiſchen Gottesdienſt. Das 4. Buch Moſe. Numeri. Zählung des Volkes. Wiederholung Das 5. Buch Moſe. Deuteronomium. des Geſetzes. Dieſe Bücher werden im neuen Teſtament von Anm. hriſto und den Apoſteln dem Moſes zugeſchrieben. Antitheſe. Die Neueren. a. Die 5 Bücher Moſe ſeien von Eſra. — Würden vohl die Samaritaner, die die fünf Bücher Moſe als echt mnahmen, ſie erſt von Eſra, einem Juden, angenom— nen haben? b. Die fünf Bücher Moſes haben verſchiedene Verfaſſer. ein mixtum compoſitum. Delitzſch. Die 41 Haupturkun— en, aus denen der Pentateuch zuſammengeſtellt ſein ſoll, ind: Der Prieſtercoder (P), die Schriften des Jahviſten J), des Elohiſten (E) und des Deuteronomikers. Anm. a. Dabei kommen ſie freilich in die größte Ver— virrung und können nicht darüber einig werden, wem ſie die einzelnen Stellen zuſchreiben ſollen. — Die Krimti können nicht einmal ein heutzutage von zwei Perſor geſchriebenes Schriftſtück in die urſprünglichen Beſta teile auseinanderlegen! Anm. b. In den fünf Büchern Moſes findet ſich ganz einheitlicher Plan. Einwände: a. 1 Moſ. 12, 6: „Es wohneten zu der Zeit die Ka niter im Lande,“ alſo müſſe dies geſchrieben ſein, als nicht mehr im Lande wohnten, nach der Eroberung naans, nach Moſis Tode. — „Zu der Zeit“ kann a heißen: „zu der Zeit ſchon.“ b. Städte werden mit Namen genannt, die ſie erſten Moſe Tod erhielten. 1 Moſ. 14, 14 verglichen mit ½ 19, 47. Richter 18, 27—29. — Das mögen zwei r ſchiedene Städte geweſen ſein. oder der Name der St iſt (wie öfter geſchehen) im Laufe der Zeit von Abſch bern korrigiert worden. . Es ſollen hiſtoriſche Ausſagen aus nachmoſaiſe Zeit darin vorkommen. 1 Moſ. 36, 31. ehe die Kin Jjrael Könige hatten. — Da den JIsraeliten Königeer heißen waren (1 Moſ. 35, 11. 17, 6. 16. 5 Moſ. 17, 1 ſo konnte von Königen die Rede ſein vor ihrer Exiſten d. 2 Moſ. 16, 35. Sie aßen Man, bis daß ſie zu d Lande kamen, da ſie wohnen ſollten. Verglichen mit 3 5. 12. — Damit iſt nichts geſagt, was über Moſis r hinausging. e. 2 Moſ. 30, 13. Sekel des Heiligtums. Dan! müſſe das Heiligtum mit ſeinem Kultus ſchon beſtan haben. — Es kann auch heißen: einen vollwichtigen Sen! im Unterſchied von dem Sekel des täglichen Verkehrs. f. 5 Moſ. 1, 1. Das ſind die Wort, die Moſe red jenſeits des Jordans. Moſes ſei nie über den J: dan gekommen. —- Moſes gebraucht den Ausdruck 3 ſeits auch vom Lanſtierzonlande 5 Moſ. 3, 20. 8. Dagegen wird 4 Moſ. 32, 19 derſelbe Ausdruck im K bräiſchen erſt vom Weſt, dann vom Oſtjordanland braucht. g. 5 Moſ. 34. Die Erzählung von Moſis Tod u: Begräbnis. — — iſt von jemand anders zugefügt W den. ö h. Der Wechſel der Gottesnamen Elohim und Jah Im Schöpfungsbericht ſteht 35 mal Elohim, der Schöpf Im 2. Schöpfungsbericht (1 Moſ. 2) ſteht faſt immer! Name Jahve, der die Beziehung Gottes zu ſeinem V als Heilsgott ausdrückt. — Moſes kann Aufzeichnunge von uſchedenen Patriarchen mitbenutzt Duben gere wie Luk. 1. 3 von eigenen Forſchungen des Lukas Rede iſt. i. Die Wiederholung des Schöpfungsberichtes und d! Geſetes. — 1 Moſ. 1. beſchreibt die Schöpfung ſell! Kapitel 2 was aus Himmel und Erde nun nach ihn Schöpfung weiter geworden iſt. — Im 2. Buch Moſe richtet Moſe als Geſetzgeber, im 5. Buch Moſe legt Prophet das Geſetz aus. . Die Verſchiedenheit des Stils, der Sprache, der reöſen Anſchauungen, Lieblingsausdrücke. — Dann n man jede Schrift jedem Schriftſteller abſprechen. ie Perſon kann grundverſchiedene Schriften ſchreiben. ulus. Luther. — Sprachliche Verſchiedenheiten erklä— ſich durch die Annahme, daß die fünf Bücher Moſes nin einem Zeitraum geſchrieben ſein müſſen. — t Cicero und Göthe verfahren die Kritiker anders als der Bibel. ( Stellen, die Moſes nicht über ſich ſelbſt habe ſchrei— können, 5. B. 4 Moſ. 12, 3: Der Mann Moſe aber r ſeyr ſanftmütig. — Luther überſetzt: ſehr geplagt. n. Moſes rede nie von ſich in der erſten Perſon, obhlaer ſein eignes Leben und Wirken ſchildert. — Das auch Cäſar nicht in ſeinem „galliſchen Krieg,“ Xenomein ſeiner „Anabaſis“ u. ſ. w. . Verſpottung der Bibelkritik nach Goethes Erlkönig. zulb. 39, 58.

AI translation · machine

4. The Pentateuch. The 1st Book of Moses. Genesis. Origin. Coming-into-being. The 2nd Book of Moses. Exodus. Departure from Egypt. The 3rd Book of Moses. Leviticus. Regulations concerning Levitical worship. The 4th Book of Moses. Numbers. Numbering of the people. The 5th Book of Moses. Deuteronomy. Repetition of the Law. These books are ascribed to Moses in the New Testament by Christ and the apostles. Note. Antithesis. The moderns. a. The five books of Moses are said to be by Ezra. — Would the Samaritans, who accepted the five books of Moses as genuine, have accepted them only from Ezra, a Jew? b. The five books of Moses have various authors, a mixtum compositum. Delitzsch. The four principal documents from which the Pentateuch is supposed to have been compiled are: the Priestly Code (P), the writings of the Yahwist (J), the Elohist (E), and the Deuteronomist. Note a. In doing so they indeed fall into the greatest confusion and cannot agree among themselves as to which passages should be attributed to which source. — The critics cannot even, in our own day, separate a document written by two persons into its original component parts! Note b. In the five books of Moses there is found a completely unified plan. Objections: a. Gen. 12, 6: "At that time the Canaanites dwelt in the land," therefore this must have been written when they no longer dwelt in the land, after the conquest of Canaan, after Moses' death. — "At that time" can also mean: "already at that time." b. Cities are named by names which they received only after Moses' death. Gen. 14, 14 compared with Josh. 19, 47. Judges 18, 27—29. — These may have been two different cities, or the name of the city has (as often happened) been corrected over time by copyists. c. Historical statements from post-Mosaic times are supposed to occur in it. Gen. 36, 31, before the children of Israel had kings. — Since kings had been promised to the Israelites (Gen. 35, 11. 17, 6.16. Deut. 17, 14), one could speak of kings before their existence. d. Ex. 16, 35. They ate manna until they came to the land in which they were to dwell. Compared with Josh. 5, 12. — Nothing is said here that goes beyond Moses' lifetime. e. Ex. 30, 13. Shekel of the sanctuary. Therefore the sanctuary with its cultus must already have existed. — It can also mean: a full-weight shekel, as distinguished from the shekel of everyday commerce. f. Deut. 1, 1. These are the words which Moses spoke beyond the Jordan. Moses is said never to have come across the Jordan. — Moses also uses the expression "beyond" of the land east of the Jordan, Deut. 3, 20. 8. On the other hand, in Num. 32, 19 the same expression is used in Hebrew first of the west side, then of the east side of the Jordan. g. Deut. 34. The account of Moses' death and burial — was added by someone else. h. The change of the divine names Elohim and Jahve. In the creation account, Elohim, the Creator, occurs 35 times. In the second creation account (Gen. 2) the name Jahve, which expresses God's relationship to his people as the God of salvation, occurs almost throughout. — Moses may have made use of records from various patriarchs, just as in Luke 1, 3 mention is made of Luke's own researches. i. The repetition of the creation account and of the Law. — Gen. 1 describes creation itself; chapter 2, what became of heaven and earth after their creation. — In the second book of Moses, Moses instructs as lawgiver; in the fifth book of Moses, the prophet expounds the Law. k. The difference of style, language, religious views, favorite expressions. — By that standard one could deny any writing to any writer. One and the same person can write utterly different writings. Paul. Luther. — Linguistic differences are explained by the assumption that the five books of Moses need not have been written within one period of time. — Critics treat the Bible differently than they treat Cicero and Goethe. l. Passages which Moses could not have written about himself, e.g. Num. 12, 3: "Now the man Moses was very meek." — Luther translates: "very afflicted." m. Moses never speaks of himself in the first person, although he describes his own life and work. — Neither did Caesar in his "Gallic War," nor Xenophon in his "Anabasis," etc. n. Mockery of Bible criticism after Goethe's "Erlkönig." Schulb. 39, 58.

  • Stöckh. A. T. 152 margin
  • Cal. 1906, 14 margin
  • Luth. 2, 3 Rationalism and the Bible. margin
  • L. W. 17, 101 margin
  • L. W. 17, 101. 50, 70 —75 margin
  • L. W. 17, 101. 50, 70 —75. 111—121 margin
  • W. 1901, 26 margin
  • Il. 1907, 78 margin
  • L. W. 53, 188 margin
  • L. W. 48, 90 margin
  • L. W. 48, 90. 91 margin
  • L. W. 48, 90. 91. 50, 313 margin
  • L. W. 50, 512 margin
  • L. W. 50, 512. 156 margin
  • L. W. 50, 512. 156. 2 margin
  • L. W. 50, 512. 156. 2 2 — 2 margin
  • L. W. 50, 158—160 margin
  • L. W. 50, 160—164 margin
  • L. W. 50, 209 margin
  • L. W. 50, 210 margin
  • L. W. 50, 211 margin
  • L. W. 50, 213 margin
  • L. W. 50, 213. 160 margin
  • L. W. 50, 213. 160. 161 margin
  • L. W. 50, 259 margin
  • L. W. 50, 259. 413 margin
  • Schulb. 33, 63 margin
  • Schulb. 33, 63. 64 margin
  • L. W. 50, 410 margin
  • L. W. 50, 410. 415— 418 margin
  • L. W. 50, 309 margin
  • L. W. 50, 309. 512 margin
  • L. W. 50, 309. 512 12 margin
  • L. W. 50, 510 margin

vol a, printed page 395–397 · scan: bub_gb_3EAUAAAAYAAJ/n0395

5. —

5. Von den folgenden Büchern können die Verfaſſer ht mit Beſtimmtheit ermittelt werden: Joſua. Nach Joſuas Tod geſchrieben. Joſ. 15, 13—19. gl. mit Richter 1, 12. Richter. Wahrſcheinlich von Samuel. Ruth. Samuelis. — Sch. 21. Könige. — Sch. 23. Chronika. — Vermuthlich von Eſra. Die doppelte Ka— elerzählung iſt von Luther verurſacht, der aus dem 4. pitel zwei »nachte. — Sch. 25—28. Eitu. Nach der babyloniſchen Gefangenſchaft. — Sch. Nehemia. Sch. 30. Eſther. Entſtehung des Purimfeſtes. Sch. 32.

AI translation · machine

5. The authors of the following books cannot be determined with certainty: Joshua. Written after Joshua's death. Josh. 15, 13—19, compared with Judges 1, 12. Judges. Probably by Samuel. Ruth. Samuel. — Sch. 21. Kings. — Sch. 23. Chronicles. — Presumably by Ezra. The doubling of the chapter narrative was caused by Luther, who made two chapters out of the 4th. — Sch. 25—28. Ezra. After the Babylonian captivity. — Sch. [illegible]. Nehemiah. Sch. 30. Esther. The origin of the feast of Purim. Sch. 32.

  • L. W. 52, 446 margin

vol a, printed page 397 · scan: bub_gb_3EAUAAAAYAAJ/n0397

6. Die poctiſchen Bücher

6. Die poctiſchen Bücher. Über hebräiſche Poeſie ſ. haller 34 —36. Hiob. — Can. 1904, 8. Pſalter. 123 von David. Andere Pſalmdichter: dſes, Aſſaph, Salomo u. ſ. w. Bußpſalmen: 6. 32. 38. 51. 102. 130. 143. Dankpſalmen: 92. 103 u. ſ. w. Weisſagungspſalmen: 2. 8. 16. 19. 22. 40. 111. Einteilung der Pſalmen. Schulb. 21, 151. 152. il 24. 150. Herrlichkeit 24, 149. Poeſie 38, 236. almengeſang L. W. 26, 8—15. Delitzſch und Kahnis. W. 17, 102. 103. 133. Sela. L. W. 20, 111. Schulb. „384. 24, 150. „Im höhern Chor.“ Can. 57, 53. Sprüche Salomonis.G— Sch. 41. L. W. 17, 3. Schulb. 24, 304. Prediger Salomonis. — Sch. 43. Schulb. 4% Dos Sobclied. — Sch. 14. L. W. 17. 104. 105. tulb. 24. 207. 30, 128.

AI translation · machine

6. The poetic books. On Hebrew poetry see Schaller 34—36. Job. — Can. 1904, 8. Psalter. 123 [Psalms] by David. Other psalm-writers: Moses, Asaph, Solomon, etc. Penitential psalms: 6. 32. 38. 51. 102. 130. 143. Psalms of thanksgiving: 92. 103, etc. Prophetic (messianic) psalms: 2. 8. 16. 19. 22. 40. 111. Division of the Psalms. Schulb. 21, 151. 152. Title 24, 150. Glory 24, 149. Poetry 38, 236. Psalm-singing L. W. 26, 8—15. Delitzsch and Kahnis. L. W. 17, 102. 103. 133. Selah. L. W. 20, 111. Schulb. 3, 384. 24, 150. "In the higher choir." Can. 57, 53. Proverbs of Solomon. — Sch. 41. L. W. 17, 3. Schulb. 24, 304. Ecclesiastes of Solomon. — Sch. 43. Schulb. [illegible]. The Song of Songs. — Sch. 14. L. W. 17, 104. 105. Schulb. 24, 207. 30, 128.

  • Can. 1904, 8
  • Schulb. 21, 151
  • Schulb. 21, 151. 152
  • Schulb. 21, 151. 152. il
  • Schulb. 21, 151. 152. il 24
  • Schulb. 21, 151. 152. il 24. 150
  • L. W. 26, 8—15
  • W. 17, 102
  • W. 17, 102. 103
  • W. 17, 102. 103. 133
  • L. W. 20, 111
  • Can. 57, 53
  • L. W. 17, 3
  • Schulb. 24, 304
  • Schulb. 4
  • L. W. 17. 104
  • L. W. 17. 104. 105
  • Schulb. 38, 324 margin
  • Schulb. 38, 324. 24 margin
  • Schulb. 38, 324. 24. 149—152 margin
  • Schulb. 38, 324. 24. 149—152. 143—146 margin
  • Schulb. „384. 24, 150. „

vol a, printed page 397 · scan: bub_gb_3EAUAAAAYAAJ/n0397

A citation shown like this names a volume the archive does not hold — most of Der Lutheraner and Lehre und Wehre past Jahrgang 10, and the five other series Eckhardt indexes, none of which are here. Those references are printed as Eckhardt set them rather than hidden: the reference is the useful thing even when we cannot serve the page. Page images of the Reallexikon itself are not served in this build; the scan note under each entry gives the item and image index in the archive.org copy.