Collection › The Lutheran Pioneer (St. Louis) › Vol. 52 (1930) › Page 121
The Lutheran Pioneer St. Louis — 1930, Page 121
front matter 1
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Sheet 93
Page 92
Page 93
Sheet 96
Page 95
Page 96
Sheet 99
Sheet 100
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Sheet 109
Page 108
Page 109
Sheet 112
Page 111
Page 112
Sheet 115
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Sheet 119
Page 118
Sheet 121
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Sheet 130
Sheet 131
Page 130
Sheet 133
Page 132
Sheet 135
Page 134
Sheet 137
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Sheet 143
Page 142
Page 143
Sheet 146
Sheet 147
Sheet 148
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Sheet 162
Sheet 163
Sheet 164
Sheet 165
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Sheet 175
Page 174
Sheet 177
Page 176
Sheet 179
Sheet 180
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Sheet 187
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Sheet 193
Page 192
Concordia Seminary Library, St. Louis (scholar.csl.edu/lutheran_pioneer/52)
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
THE LUTHERAN PIONEER.
121
States’ in the Friend, takes great pains to calculate
just how remiss the American Lutherans have been
in gathering into their communion the millions of
immigrants from Lutheran lands in Europe as well
as their descendants.
“According to the 1928 Statistical Abstract, Lu-
therans increased 1,498,487 from 1916 to 1926,
while Baptists added 1,287,809, Methodists 903,734,
and Presbyterians 369,658 souls during the same
period of time. This represents a splendid achieve-
ment for the Lutherans— until you take pencil and
paper in hand and do some figuring with immigra-
tion of the same time. Dr. Lundquist estimates : —
“In 1920 in the United States there were
foreign-born Say Lutheran Potential
Population Ratio Lutherans
Germans 1,686,108 s/s 562,036
Swedes 625,585 °*/10 536,026
Norwegians 363,863 "ho 327,476
Danes 189,154 ®/ 50 170,238
Finns 149,824 1075
149,824
Total possible foreign-born Lutherans, 1,772,600
“In 1920, in the United States, there were de-
scendants (first generation only) of foreign-born:
Lutheran Potential
Population Ratio Lutherans
Germans 8,164,111 5 2,721,370
Swedes 1,485,062 hie 1,336,554
Norwegians 1,020,788 ®/10 918,S09
Danes 466,946 "hi 420,251
Finns 265,472 */1 241,580
Total possible descendants of foreign-
born Lutherans, 5,638,564
“In addition, Dr. Lundquist considers the 8,344
souls, members of the Norwegian Synod of America,
the 14,759 members of the Slovak Lutheran Church
in America, and the 2,186 members of the Icelandic
Lutheran Church in America. Thus his total esti-
mate of ‘potential Lutherans’ in the United States
comes to 7,436,453.
“However, the 1928 Statistical Abstract lists
only 3,966,003 Lutherans in the United States.
Thus it is quite evident that, while our Church has
enjoyed the best increase during 1916 to 1926, yet
she has not nearly expanded as she might have, had
she retained a greater percentage of Lutheran immi-
grants and their descendants.”
So far a recent issue of the News Bulletin of the
L. P. B. Of course, we realize that not all these
nominal Lutherans coming to our shores would
unite with us, even if we did invite them and do our
utmost to persuade them to join us. But we can-
not deny that the presence of this great number of
people among us who are not strangers to our
Church should be a very strong incentive for us
to do our utmost to bring them in. We cannot
deny that we have neglected many an opportunity
presented to us in the open country and in the
crowded city. God has hitherto so richly blessed
our efforts that these successes in the past should
urge us strongly to increase our endeavors in the
future. We can truthfully say that God has blessed
no other missionary attempts so bountifully as just
our feeble efforts to gather in those who came to our
shores bearing the Lutheran name. While we turn
also to other people and seek to gather them into
the fold, let us not decrease, but rather increase our
efforts to bring into our fold the “potential Lu-
therans” within the bounds of our country.
FB. J.L.
Why a National Lutheran Radio Hour?
If you have not yet done so, you ought to mark
Memorial Day, Friday, May 30, 1930, on your
calendar as a red-letter day in the history of the
Lutheran Church; for on that day the Lutheran
Laymen’s League in national convention assembled
at Chicago, Ill., unanimously and enthusiastically
resolved to sponsor a weekly National Lutheran
Radio Hour oves the Columbia Broadcasting Sys-
tem, beginning this fall.
This convention will linger long in the memory
of those who had the opportunity and privilege to
attend it, for the soul-saving influence of the reso-
lution regarding radio will, if it please God, soon
be. felt from coast to coast and from the Gulf to
the Great Lakes. Moreover, one of the laymen in-
spired the convention with a vision of world-wide
Lutheran radioactivity.
Some one may ask why a national Lutheran
Radio Hour? ‘There is a cluster of reasons, but
I shall only mention one of them.
Twenty years ago four farmer boys discovered
a turtle near a village in Illinois and carved their
initials on its shell and turned it-loose. On June 6
of this year one of them found it on his father’s
farm, just one mile from where-it had been released
in 1910. The markings on it were still legible. The
Church should not move slowly and clumsily like
a turtle. She should not in the twentieth century
use first-century methods if God has placed at her
disposal better, quicker, and more effective means.
A missionary will not spend a year traveling to the
Orient by sailboat if a modern ocean liner can take
him to “India’s coral strands” in one-twelfth of the
time; a pioneer missionary in South America will
é