Collection › The Lutheran Pioneer (St. Louis) › Vol. 52 (1930) › Page 114

The Lutheran Pioneer St. Louis — 1930, Page 114

front matter 1 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Sheet 93 Page 92 Page 93 Sheet 96 Page 95 Page 96 Sheet 99 Sheet 100 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Sheet 109 Page 108 Page 109 Sheet 112 Page 111 Page 112 Sheet 115 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Sheet 119 Page 118 Sheet 121 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Sheet 130 Sheet 131 Page 130 Sheet 133 Page 132 Sheet 135 Page 134 Sheet 137 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Sheet 143 Page 142 Page 143 Sheet 146 Sheet 147 Sheet 148 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Sheet 162 Sheet 163 Sheet 164 Sheet 165 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Sheet 175 Page 174 Sheet 177 Page 176 Sheet 179 Sheet 180 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Sheet 187 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Sheet 193 Page 192

Concordia Seminary Library, St. Louis (scholar.csl.edu/lutheran_pioneer/52)

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

114

THE LUTHERAN PIONEER.

Read and Ponder.

Our expenses for pleasures and luxuries are
simply enormous. The people of our country spend
almost incredible sums of money for things that
are not really necessary. Here are a few items:
For automobiles our annual expense is more than
THREE AND A HALF BILLION DOLLARS; our expense
account for tobacco exceeds TWO BILLION DOLLARS;
for candies the bill is more than ONE BILLION
DOLLARS; for soft drinks it is 750 MILLION DOLLARS
EVERY YEAR. Over against these enormous expen-
ditures for luxuries we have an annual expense of
LESS THAN FIVE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS FOR
ALL CHURCH INTERESTS. In view of these figures,
does it look as if we were heeding the admonition
of the Lord to seek first the kingdom of God?

The writer showed these figures to a brother
pastor a few days ago, and then he submitted to
him the following facts taken from the Literary
Digest: In a large congregation, consisting of over
500 families, 145 families paid nothing at all. The
remaining families contributed as follows: Forty
gave less than the cost of an auto tire a year; 119
gave less than the cost of two tires in a year; five
families gave a weekly contribution equal to the cost
of an ice-cream soda; seven families pledged the
cost of a package of gum per week; twenty-eight
families promised to give every week a sum equal to
a@ movie admission; forty-six families contributed
every week the cost of a half-pound of candy;
twenty-two families agreed to pay each week a sum
equal to the cost of two and one half gallons of gaso-
line; and fifty-one families pledged per week what
would equal the cost of a man’s “smokes” for a day.

After we had studied this “set-up,” we both, my
colleague and I, agreed that this was hardly treating
God and His kingdom in a fair way, and my brother
pastor added: “I am sure that my people make a
better showing than that.” He agreed to look over
the pledges his people had made in last fall’s every-
member canvass and to report his findings upon the
occasion of his next visit.

You will realize that I expectantly looked for-
ward to his next visit and earnestly hoped it might
be right soon. It was probably a week later when
he came. After he had made himself at home in
my study, I impatiently waited for him to make his
report, but he apparently was interested in every
_ other subject except the one I was most concerned
_ about. Finally I asked him outright what his find-

“ings were as far as the contributions of his members

were concerned. With a rueful smile he answered,

“The contributions of my people are less than those
of that congregation on which the Digest reported !”’

How many pastors would not have to say the
same?

However, what can we do to remedy the situa-
tion? Must we take for granted that our people
are really so indifferent to the needs of God’s king-
dom as the above figures seem to indicate? Is it
not rather true that our people are such poor givers
because they do not realize the needs of the Church
nor their need of the Church? If our members
could be made to see the financial wants of the
Church in order to carry on its great work of ser-
vice; if we could induce the members to consider
fully that, being in the world, the Church has its
material needs just as has every organization on
earth, the members would most certainly respond
with the necessary assistance.

And then our people do not realize what they
owe to the Church and its unselfish ministrations.
Too many among us just take the Church for
granted and only realize what it all means to us
when we are deprived of its blessings. It is with
the Church just as it is with health, parents, or
wife — we learn its great value and our obligation
to it when deprived of its service. F. J. L.

General Conference, Springfield, IIl.,
July 31—August 4.

Pastors, teachers, and lay delegates from the
various congregations of our wide-spread Colored
Missions field met at Springfield, Ill., July 31 to
August 4. This is the third biennial conference
held. We expect to bring a full report of this im-
portant meeting in our next issue. Three impor-
tant papers were presented: Rev. J. W. Fuller read
a paper on “The Negro Lodge,” Prof. F. &. Mayer
of the Springfield Seminary read a timely paper on
the Augsburg Confession, and Prof. Theo. Graebner
of the St. Louis Seminary read an essay on “The
Layman’s Activity in the Work of the Church.”
We understand that a short exegetical paper was also
presented, but are unable to give the name of the
author. f

The General Conference also discussed matters
of directly practical value, such as the feasibility of
organizing the conference into a synod; the desir-
ability of introducing the Common Order of Service
into all our colored congregations; the practica-
bility of establishing a printing office for our Col-
ored Missions; and the like. :