Collection › The Lutheran Pioneer (St. Louis) › Vol. 50 (1928) › Page 183
The Lutheran Pioneer St. Louis — 1928, Page 183
front matter 1
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Sheet 34
Sheet 35
Sheet 36
Sheet 37
Sheet 38
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Sheet 51
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Sheet 67
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 72
Page 13
Page 14
Sheet 75
Sheet 76
Page 71
Page 18
Page 719
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Concordia Seminary Library, St. Louis (scholar.csl.edu/lutheran_pioneer/50)
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
THE LUTHERAN PIONEER.
183
may be sent on a visit to the town of his tribal
brother. But her children, born of whatever con-
nection, belong not to herself nor necessarily to
their father, but to the man who owns her; to her
own father or some other male guardian, if born
before marriage, and to her husband if born after
marriage. As she is not born to the possession of
her body, so she is not born to the possession of her
children. Women who have been sold from mar-
riage to marriage may leave little children at
every station of that aimless wandering. ‘Thus the
slave is branded on the heart.
The Things of Fetish.
“And it is by way of the heart that the woman
is slave to fetish. By her body she is slave to goods,
and alas! by the consent of her body, to sex. But
by her heart, — the pangs of it, its maternal pangs,
its hunger for permanent affections, its need to cast
anchor in some certain good, — by that she is slave
to fetish. ‘To keep her husband’s love, what love-
potions! 'T’o ease her jealousies, what evil charms!
To safeguard her little one, what plaitings of grass
anklets and bracelets, what desperate hopes tied up
in little amulets, in little things of magic!, And if
she die, this slave to fetish, they will tie a belt of
bells about her baby’s middle, and the sound of
these bells will continually drive away that maternal
spirit — still a slave.
The Slave’s Liberation.
“To such as these, in a very definite sense, Christ
is a Liberator. It is not for nothing that of the
women who have come under my hand many have
fastened with a peculiar tenacity on the verses that
say for them, ‘He has made the captives free’; “The
truth has made you free.’ ,
“This African woman has a bald knowledge of
her enslaved state. She is violent, undisciplined ;
her tongue is a fire and a sword; she is unmoral;
unreliable; but she is humble-minded. In the
Biblical sense this violent creature, caught in a net
of tattoo, bridled and belted with beads, collared and
- braceleted with brass, this woman — so harnessed
with barbarous ornament — is meek and poor in
spirit. She is poor in the most conscious and the
most pitiable sense. Christ’s act of redemption has
a tangible and obvious application to herself. I have
seen the first words of the Gospel arrest a young
N’tum woman so abruptly that you would have said
a hand had been laid upon her, and back of her
harness of tattoo and of beads her woman face, so
soft and mutable, was stricken to the most profound, -
the most personal, attention. That being, enslaved
to goods and sex and fetish, received, with what
astonishment, in that word of the Word of God, her
first intimation that there is any escape from the
prison of material circumstance. Until she heard that
word, she was never at any time conscious of a self
which could not be bought and sold. Until then she
had never conceived of a personal possession of any
sort, however humble, and how far she had been
from any ‘self’-possession. Never before had her
self been addressed. And in the moment of that
divine address there was a pause in her universe;
the things of the body were smitten to a perceptible
arrest. She had been grinding meal; her hand,
with the upper stone, lay idle on the nether stone;
her eyes were fixed; in all her hut nothing stirred
while that N’tum woman experienced the obscure
shock of her first spiritual summons.
Solidarity of Sex.
“To an extraordinary degree there is among the
Bulus a solidarity of sex. ‘God created all people of
two tribes, the women tell me, ‘the tribe of man and
the tribe of woman.’ The things of one tribe are
hidden from the other tribe. There is ‘a wisdom
of men and a wisdom of women,’ though the wisdom
of women is a small matter, a matter to laugh at
among men. And women, for all they have a house-
wifely and maternal contempt for men, yet are
humble before them, ashamed before them of their
age-old accumulation of wisdom, not displaying be-
fore them their little treasure of verity garnered
from their labors and their loves and their sorrows
‘since the birth of men.’ ‘I am as stupid as a hen,’
is the common feminine self-analysis.
In the Things of Labor.
“A peculiar shame attaches to the performance
of a woman’s work by a man; the division of labor
is determined by the most rigid custom. None but
women grind meal, none but men sew the strips of
beaten bark cloth into squares. And about every
handicraft of the tribes there is the law of sex and
the understood element of nobility or ignobility.
‘Am I a woman that I should bring in food from
the garden? I will starve first.’
“And if in the things of labor the customs of sex
are ‘very strong, much stronger are they in the
matter of fetish. Woe to those who are ignorant in
these matters, who confuse the food,. the acts, and
the liberties which are the privileges of men with
the food and the acts and the liberties which are the
forbidden things for women. It is a very literal
’
\