Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1992 · 58th Convention › Page 115
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1992, Page 115
front matter 1
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Sheet 151
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Sheet 160
Sheet 161
Page 160
Sheet 163
Page 162
Sheet 165
Page 164
Sheet 167
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Sheet 171
Page 170
Sheet 173
Page 172
Sheet 175
Page 174
Sheet 177
Page 176
Sheet 179
Page 178
Sheet 181
Page 180
Sheet 183
Page 182
Page 183
Sheet 186
Sheet 187
Sheet 188
Page 188
Sheet 190
Page 190
Sheet 192
Sheet 193
Sheet 194
Sheet 195
Sheet 196
Sheet 197
Sheet 198
Sheet 199
Sheet 200
Sheet 201
Sheet 202
Sheet 203
Page 204
Sheet 205
Page 206
Sheet 207
Sheet 208
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS 117
2. As Creator, God alone knows with certainty whether
a disease or an injury is incurable.
3. When the God-given powers of the body to sustain its _
own life can no longer function and doctors in their profes-
sional judgment conclude that there is no real hope for
recovery even with life-support instruments, a Christian
may in good conscience “let nature take its course.” :
4. Administering pain-killing medications, even at the
risk of shortening life, is permissible, since this does not
entail the choice of death as either a means or an end. |
5. It is good ethical procedure for the doctor to request
. and receive a statement signed by the patient, if competent
_to consent, or by the nearest of kin, agreeing to the use-
lessness of further “heroic efforts” and consenting to ter-
mination of treatmenis.
6. Each person, no matter how infirm and socially use-
less he or she may appear to be, deserves to be accepted as
a being created in the image of God. :
7. While suffering is an intrusion into life, it provides
the opportunity for Christian witness and service.
8. Often the time prior to death is so wrapped in mystery
that no one ought forcibly to interrupt the movement of
man’s spirit as it may be communicating through God's
Spirit with his Creator.and Redeemer by way of responding
in trust and inner yearning.
9. Death is not merely.a physical but a crucial spiritual
event for each person.
10. Any decisions made in this highly complex area, and
any actions taken that may later appear to have been wrong,
have been redeemed by that forgiveness which is available
to all who put their trust in the work and merits of man-
kind’s Savior and Redeemer.
11, The spiritual and moral questions raised by the issue
of euthanasia are of such a nature that their evaluation is
an enterprise touching on the very survival of the basic
principles which undergird the integrity of our Christian
faith and the survival of our cultural heritage. They con-
; stitute the primary spiritual and moral crucible of this age.
12. Christians are obligated to make their position
known, by whatever means possible, as a way of helping to-
shape public opinion on the question of euthanasia.
and be it finally
Resolved, That we encourage the members of The Lu-
theran Church—Missouri Synod to boldly address such
ethical questions as the following to the society in which
we live:
“What kind of people are we becoming if we cannot care
for the weak and helpless?”
“What does it-demonstrate about our character if we
think we have the right to end life?”
Action: Adopted (11).
(In session 10 an amendment and two additional points were
offered as additions to the original resolution. No action was taken
on these proposals. However, in session 11 the revised resolution
incorporated the proposed whereas as the second one in its 3-11A
and one of the point as the final resolve. The specific points could
not be changed since they were a direct quotation from a revious
document. The seen d point which would have stat , “Spiri-
tual care and support, however, must be provided for those who
struggle with the issues and burdens of caring for patients with :
such chronically debilitating illnesses such as Alzheimer’s,” was,
in substance, included as a fifth whereas, the delegates adding
the words including material support, by common consent.)
To Develop Plan for Ministry
to Homosexuals and Their Families
RESOLUTION 3-12A
Overtures 3-86, 3-88A—C, 3-89A-B, 3-91 (CW, pp. 207-
08)
. Wuereas, Many voices in our society as well as in var-
ious church bodies are expressing the view today that ho-
mophile behavior is an acceptable alternative lifestyle; and
Wuereas, The Word of God clearly condemns homo-
phile behavior in Lev. 18:22, Rom. L 26-27, and 1 Cor. 6:9;
and
_Wuereas, The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod in
convention in 1973 stated: “That the Synod recognize ho-
mophile behavior as intrinsically sinful”; and
Wuereas, The Commission on Theology and Church’
Relations document on Human Sexuality, A Theological
Perspective, states, “Whatever the causes of such a con-
dition may be, . . . homosexual orientation is profoundly
‘unnatural’ without implying that such a person’s sexual
orientation is a matter-of conscious, deliberate choice.
However, this fact cannot be used by the homosexual as
an excuse to justify homosexual behavior. As a sinful hu-
man being, the homosexual is accountable to God for ho-
mosexual thoughts, words, and deéds.” (Human Sexuality,
A Theological Perspective, p. 35); and
Wuereas, The redeeming love of Christ, which rescues
humanity from sin, death, and the power of Satan, is: of-
fered to all through repentance and faith in Christ, re-
gardless of the nature of their sinfulness; and
" Wuereas, The need exists to make available a carefully
developed Law/Gospel ministry plan to congregations and
other institutions in order to minister to those who are
troubled by their homosexuality; and °
_ Wuereas, It is necessary for the church to expose and
resist the sexual idolatry of our society; therefore be it’
' Resolved, That The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod,
in convention, reaffirm the position it stated in 1973, “That
the Synod recognize homophile behavior as intrinsically
sinful”; and be it further
Resolved, That the President of the Synod direct the
appropriate boards and commissions to develop a plan for
ministry usable by congregations, campus ministries, in-
stitutions, and agencies in the Synod, for the purpose of
providing biblical and Gospel-oriented ministry to persons
troubled by being homophile in their sexual orientations
and to their families; and be it finally
Resolved, That the goals to be pursued by such a plan
for ministry be
“1. to offer to our world biblically alternative models of
sexual celibacy outside of a committed, permanent het-
erosexual marriage and same-gender social, but not gen-
itally sexual, deep friendships;
2. to confront the individual] with his/her sinfulness, and
call him/her to repentance;