Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1992 · 58th Convention › Page 48
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1992, Page 48
front matter 1
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Sheet 151
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Sheet 160
Sheet 161
Page 160
Sheet 163
Page 162
Sheet 165
Page 164
Sheet 167
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Sheet 171
Page 170
Sheet 173
Page 172
Sheet 175
Page 174
Sheet 177
Page 176
Sheet 179
Page 178
Sheet 181
Page 180
Sheet 183
Page 182
Page 183
Sheet 186
Sheet 187
Sheet 188
Page 188
Sheet 190
Page 190
Sheet 192
Sheet 193
Sheet 194
Sheet 195
Sheet 196
Sheet 197
Sheet 198
Sheet 199
Sheet 200
Sheet 201
Sheet 202
Sheet 203
Page 204
Sheet 205
Page 206
Sheet 207
Sheet 208
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
43 REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT
5. The Synod’s decentralized organization is increas-
ingly effective.
A more detailed report of each District’s activities, pre-
pared by each District President, is presented elsewhere
in this Workbook.
Vice-President Mennicke and I have implemented the
plans announced at the last convention to visit with all
District: Presidents and their staffs on an individual and
regular basis during each District triennium. Visits were
~ completed in 32 districts, with additional visits now sched-
uled for all districts during the current District triennium.
These visits have done much to help strengthen.the bond
of faith, confession, and mission between the Districts and
the national offices of the Synod.
Office Administration
First Vice-President Mennicke, who serves in a full-
time capacity, has given invaluable service and leadership
in a number of important areas. The focus of his respon-
sibilities has been on District and staff relationships. In
addition, he has provided leadership for the 1991 Circuit
Counselors’ Conference, the synodical colloquy commit-
tees, the Planning Council on Mission and Ministry, and
ongoing studies on lay ministry. He has also represented
the President on the Boards of Regents of both seminaries.
In addition, he has had the important responsibility of
monitoring alleged irregularities in the doctrine and prac-
tice of the congregations and professional workers of the
Synod and of assisting and supporting the District Presi-
dents in their supervisory responsibilities in such matters.
The many administrative details and correspondence as-
sociated with the office of the President and First Vice-
President are ably handled by Professor William
Schmelder, Miss Jean Buettner, two secretaries, and a
shared-time clerical helper. Mr. Les Stroh served as as-
sistant to the President until Feb. 28, 1991. Dr. Arthur
Kuehnert, who had provided full-time assistance after his
retirement in 1988, again “retired” at the end of June 1991,
but continues to provide invaluable assistance on various
projects. A number of other staff persone assist by carrying
out various other projects on an ad hoc basis. The St. Louis-
based officers, together with the executive directors of the
Board of Directors, Commission on Theology and Church
Relations, Board for Mission Services, Board for Higher
Education Services, and the Board for Communication Ser-
vices meet on a regular basis as the “President’s Liaison
Team,” in order to provide mutual support, direction, and
planning on a number of administrative activities and
issues.
Vice-Presidents Robert King, Robert Sauer, Eugene
Bunkowske, and Walter Maier have also provided valuable
assistance during the past triennium, especially in the doc-
trinal supervision of a number of difficult cases, as well as
counsel on major issues facing the Synod. They also rep-
resented the President’s office at several of the 1991 Dis-
trict conventions and at a number of other meetings and
events. A more detailed report on the activities of the Prae-
sidium is provided below.
Ecclesiastical Supervision
The Synod has assigned to the President of the Synod
“the supervision regarding the doctrine and the adminis-
tration of :
a. all officers of the Synod;
b. all such as are employed by the Synod;
c, the individual Districts of the Synod;
d. all District Presidents” (Constitution, Art. XI, B).
The Synod has assigned the direct responsibility for su-
pervising the doctrine, life, and administration of pastors
and teachers to the respective District Presidents, who are
also charged with the responsibility of inquiring and ac-
quainting themselves with the prevailing spiritual condi-
tions of the congregations in their Districts (Constitution,
Art. 12, Bylaw 4.73). The Synod haa further assigned ec-
clesiastical supervisory responsibility to the presidents of
our colleges and seminaries. It is the responsibility of the
synodical President, assisted by the Vice-Presidents, to su-
pervise, support, and encourage these supervisors. It
should also be noted that the President always has the
power “to advise, admonish, and reprove,” hut he does not
have the authority to remove people from office. In other
words, supervision of doctrine and practice in the Synod
is highly structured and quite decentralized.
The Vice-Presidents and I have been very careful to
follow through on every complaint, question, or reported
irregularity by asking the appropriate District President
to make sure that the Synod’s doctrine and policies are
being carried out. In addition, my office regularly monitors
all dockets, agendas, reports, and publications of all syn-
odical boards, commissions, Districts, and institutions.
When problems or concerns are of a more general nature,
meetings of the Council of Presidents and other groups
provide opportunities for positive counsel and
encouragement.
District Presidents annually provide the synodical Pres-
ident with a detailed report on activities within their Dis-
tricts. Included in these reports is accurate information on
a number of problem cases being dealt with. In addition,
the Vice-Presidents and 1, on occasion, meet with individ-
ual District Presidents to discuss individual cases and pro-
vide encouragement. In some cases, Vice-Presidents have
joined a District President in meeting with pastors or con-
gregations experiencing difficulties in the area of doctrine
or practice. 1 am pleased to report that our District Pres-
idents have willingly and effectively addressed these su-|
pervisory responsibilities and are conscientiously working
with a number of pastors and congregations at any given
time to correct perceived problems. By their very nature,
such problems need to be addressed privately, personally,
and professionally and cannot be reported in various Dis-
trict or synodical publications. ,
Included in the annual reports of District Presidents
are statistics on the number of pastors on our clergy roster
who have experienced a broken marriage and how these _
cases have been dealt with; the number of congregations
in which women serve as chairman and elders; the in-
stances of congregations in which so-called charismatic
gifts are used publicly and how these issues are being dealt
with; the participation of pastors and lay members in un-
official special interest groups and the impact of such
groups on the attitudes of people regarding the Districts