Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1992 · 58th Convention › Page 52
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1992, Page 52
front matter 1
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Sheet 151
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Sheet 160
Sheet 161
Page 160
Sheet 163
Page 162
Sheet 165
Page 164
Sheet 167
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Sheet 171
Page 170
Sheet 173
Page 172
Sheet 175
Page 174
Sheet 177
Page 176
Sheet 179
Page 178
Sheet 181
Page 180
Sheet 183
Page 182
Page 183
Sheet 186
Sheet 187
Sheet 188
Page 188
Sheet 190
Page 190
Sheet 192
Sheet 193
Sheet 194
Sheet 195
Sheet 196
Sheet 197
Sheet 198
Sheet 199
Sheet 200
Sheet 201
Sheet 202
Sheet 203
Page 204
Sheet 205
Page 206
Sheet 207
Sheet 208
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
52 REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT
and Church Relations released a major study instrument
to assist the members of the Synod in applying our historic
church relations principle to a number of practical situa-
tions. The study recognizes the highly flexible situations
that confront many of our pastors and congregations and
attempts to offer a way to assist responsible confessional
decision-making in such instances. A more complete report
on this study is contained in the report of the CTCR to this
convention. This topic remains one of the highest priorities
of the Synod because of the frequent misunderstandings
and differences of opinion that exist within the Synod in
this sensitive area. The purpose of the churchwide discus-
sion is to assist all of us in achieving a stronger measure
of consensus in the application of our biblical and confes-
sional church relations principles, not to introduce a new
church relations agenda. Although the formulations of the
CTCR, and even the substance of its presentation, may be
revised as a result of reports from the churchwide study,
it is unfortunate that the churchwide discussions of these
issues have been marred by occasionally inaccurate, judg-
mental, and political responses.
In general, I believe The Lutheran Church—Missouri
Synod today is presenting an exceptionally strong, faithful,
and positive witness to the doctrinal position of our church
body in numerous ways throughout the world. In fact, we
need to become much more aggressive in our confessional
witness worldwide.
Relationship to Auxiliaries
The President’s office, together with key staff persons,
maintains close liaison with the leadership of the Synod’s
two auxiliaries, the International Lutheran Laymen’s
League and the International Lutheran Women’s Mission-
ary League. The presidents meet regularly for general
sharing and direction, and the executive committees meet
together with synodical leaders at least annually..The re-
lationships today continue to be excellent and are char-
acterized by a deep dedication to the task of meeting the
many opportunities for mission that we have around the
world. Inasmuch as both leagues are independent of syn-
odical decision-making structures, the existence of such
relationships is a great plus for the Synod, allowing us to
work through many questions where one or the other or
both auxiliaries are involved in projects in overseas areas.
The presidents of both auxiliaries have been invited to
bring special greetings to our convention,
President’s Commission on Women
Severe budget constraints have kept this special com-
mission of six women, appointed in 1984, from addressing
all of its concerns as completely as it would like. The focus
of this past triennium has been on developing contacts and
sharing resources among the District committees on
women that were encouraged by the 1989 synodical con-
vention. The focus of the commission and the District net-
work linked to it has been on expanding all opportunities
for the service of women to the church that are consistent
with our understanding of the Word of God. The commis-
sion has also been able to address reports from some areas
of the Synod where inappropriate attitudes toward the ser-
vice of women appear to exist. Of special importance for
this often sensitive issue was the commission's presenta-
tion to the Council of Presidents in early 1992, as well as
its contacts with our seminaries, designed to assist future
pastors in mecting the particular needs of women. The
report of this commission appears elsewhere in the
Workbook.
Black Ministry Task Force
In accord with 1989 Res. 1-04A, I convened a special
task force to review, evaluate, set goals, and create a vision
for the ongoing work of black ministry in our church body.
Twenty-three districts of the Synod responded to the sur-
vey prepared by the task force. On the basis of its extensive
study, the task force delivered its report to the President
on Jan. 9, 1991, with nine specific recommendations for
action. This excellent report and call to action has been
widely distributed throughout the Synod and has already
begun to bear fruit in a number of areas of black ministry.
Pro-Life Efforts
For several years, our church body has been recognized
as one of the strongest voices in the United States on behalf
of unborn human life and related life concerns. A special
task force of the Board for Social Ministry Services, as well
as our Washington Office of Government Information, has
been particularly helpful in expressing the Synod’s posi-
tion with reference to a number of governmental programs
or proposals, as well as encouraging instructional and car-
ing efforts at the local level.
Lutherans for Life, a pan-Lutheran organization
chaired by Dr. Jean Garton, who also serves as a special
unpaid consultant to the President and other synodical
officers and staffin this area, continues to provide excellent
leadership, as well as resources, in this important area.
As the abortion issue moves more and more to the state
‘level, it is important that individual Districts and congre-
gations develop greater knowledge and information about
this issue, with a particular focus on educational efforts
within our congregations. To that end, I have participated
in the 1992 formation of a national coalition of pro-life
leaders, who will attempt to support and lead such edu-
cational programs.
End of Life Issues
In October 1979, the Commission on Theology and
Church Relations issued a report on Euthanasia with
Guiding Principles. Since that document was produced,
end of life issues have been the subject of vigorous debate
in theological, legal, medical, and legislative arenas. Many
in our congregations, and especially our pastors who are
called to give guidance and counsel to parishioners, are in
need of the best advice and support the Synod can provide.
In order to draw responsible people together for a discus-
sion of end of life issues, I invited 12 people of the Synod,
all of whom are deeply involved in the subject, to serve as
a think tank. This meeting was held on Nov. 13, 1991. A
report on the discussion is planned for the May 1992 issue
of the Lutheran Witness. ,
Lf.
Discussions with RIM
Based on the analysis of certain statements associated
with “Renewal in Missouri,” the Commission on Theology