Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1926 · 33rd Convention, Holy Cross Church › Page 69

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1926, Page 69

front matter 1 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 86 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Sheet 90 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Sheet 95 Page 95 Page 96 Sheet 98 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 108 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Sheet 114 Page 114 Page 115 Page 1186 Sheet 118 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Sheet 124 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Sheet 131 Sheet 132 Page 182 Page 138 Sheet 135 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 146 Page 147 Sheet 149 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Sheet 190 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Sheet 199 Sheet 200 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 208 Page 204 Sheet 206 Page 206 Page 907 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 911 Page 212 Page 218 Page 914 Page 916 Page 216 Sheet 218 Page 218 Sheet 220 Page 220 Sheet 222 Page 222 Page 223 Page 924 Sheet 226 Page 226 Sheet 228 Page 228 Page 929 Page 280 Sheet 232 Page 982 Page 933 Page 234 Page 985 Page 336 Page 237 Page 938 Sheet 240 Page 240 Sheet 242 Page 942 Page 943 Sheet 245 Page 245 Page 246 Page 947 Page 248 Page 949 Sheet 251 Sheet 252 Sheet 253 Sheet 254

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

Ev. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. 1926. 69

D. In view of the present shortage of men, the enormous loss of
candidates, and, if one may say so, of the working years of pasters
{two years less in office) would invalidate the advantages of the
extension.

Il. Neither present nor future conditions will ever require such
a senior college course as is proposed.

A. The Church must under all cireumstances confine to a min-
imum the scientific knowledge made obligatory upon its pastors. It
is contrary to Scripture to make the scientific education of a ‘pastor
the conditio sine qua non in nominating candidates for the ministry.
Christ added but one learned Paul to his apostles; the rest were
mostly simple fishermen.

B. The present term of instruction is adequate to reach the goal
of our institutions, to wit, to educate pastors who are able “to teach
and to defend.” Synod has greater need of a large number of candi-
dates adequately equipped for the Lord’s work than of a smaller
number who have enjoyed a higher education.

C. The study of theology at St. Louis may very readily follow the
present junior college course. This has been done hitherto and éan
still be achieved,

-a) Our junior colleges should exert themselves to do their best in
six years: more intensive work, greater demands on the scholars,
sterner elimination of weak pupils, longer scholastic year.

b) In electing professors, one ought to look about more for
pastors who are masters of the branches they are called to teach and

have good teaching ability.

ec) The junior colleges ought to be regularly and carefully visited

by experts. Necessary investigations should be carried on with

respect to branches of study, methods of teaching, and the members
of the faculties. Whatever does not serve the purpose ought to be
removed; of course, in the proper manner. ‘
“*d) Years will less determine whether ‘students are fit to enter
St. Louis than character; and the building of characters can very
well be accomplished in six years, provided the correct means and
methods are employed, to wit, God’s Word and firm discipline. Let
the chief emphasis be put on positive, aggressive preaching of the
Gospel and not upon science and beating the air fighting with sec-
tarian preachers.

e) The seminary course should be adapted to the students and
their peculiar needs, not the students to the seminary course. ,

D. Whether our candidates have obtained an academic degree
when they enter the ministry.is a matter of minor importance. oo.

a) Statistics show that only 461 of our 3,221 pastors teach school
and require an academic degree for the sake of our schools. It would