Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1926 · 33rd Convention, Holy Cross Church › Page 68
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1926, Page 68
front matter 1
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 86
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Sheet 90
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Sheet 95
Page 95
Page 96
Sheet 98
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 108
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Sheet 114
Page 114
Page 115
Page 1186
Sheet 118
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Sheet 124
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Sheet 131
Sheet 132
Page 182
Page 138
Sheet 135
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 146
Page 147
Sheet 149
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Sheet 190
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Sheet 199
Sheet 200
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 208
Page 204
Sheet 206
Page 206
Page 907
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 911
Page 212
Page 218
Page 914
Page 916
Page 216
Sheet 218
Page 218
Sheet 220
Page 220
Sheet 222
Page 222
Page 223
Page 924
Sheet 226
Page 226
Sheet 228
Page 228
Page 929
Page 280
Sheet 232
Page 982
Page 933
Page 234
Page 985
Page 336
Page 237
Page 938
Sheet 240
Page 240
Sheet 242
Page 942
Page 943
Sheet 245
Page 245
Page 246
Page 947
Page 248
Page 949
Sheet 251
Sheet 252
Sheet 253
Sheet 254
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
68 Proceedings of Thirty-Third Regular Convention,
would be ample room. Lecture-rooms could be placed remote from ae
the noise of Jefferson Ave,
c) Arrangements could be made to give the students of these two
extra classes opportunities for athletic exercises. Besides, for major
sports the gymnasium, which undoubtedly will be built for the sem-
inary, and the splendid athletic field on the seminary grounds would 4
be available.
d) The commissary departments of both institutions could prob-
ably be combined in such a manner as to effect great economic 3
advantages.
By resolution of the Arkansas and West Tennessee
Pastoral Conference, wfanqin J. BRUEGGEMANN. ...’
The Western District in session at St. Charles, Mo.,- October 4
14—20, 1925, resolved to recommend the West Tennessee and
Arkansas Conference overture addressed to Synod for adoption with- a
out going on record for or against the last point in regard to the 3
seminary buildings. Ricu. Krerzscumar, President.
pot oes J. Oppriaer, Secretary.
Reasons Against Extending the Junior College Course.
(Memorial of the Lake Superior Special Conference. — Abridged.)
Touching the introduction of a senior college course, obligatory 4
or elective, we would ask Synod to consider the following: —
I. For the present, and for many years to come, the proposed
extension of our junior college course is impractical.
A. Synod is not sufficiently prepared for this step. “Without
a thoroughly planned and extensive preparation the extension would
but serve to confuse our entire educational system. The beginning
must be made in the lower classes. To do this requires a long timé.
B. The extension would not be without evil consequences. ;
a) Sons of pastors and sons of relatively poor congregation- %
members would suffer most. q
b) Board money would in many instances have to be paid by the ¢
District treasuries.
C. Such an extension would entail an enormous increase in a the
expenses of Synod, which would constantly grow.
a) Synod’s debt at present (February, 1926) is $483,000.
b). Many additional professors would be necessary.
c) The costs of an appropriate library ought to be considered
as well as —
d) The cost of modern, scientific laboratories ;
e) Finally the cost of keeping up the old Seminary or of new
buildings. (The old Seminary in St. Louis cannot be used for any
length of time if the reasons advanced for erecting new buildings
were not feigned.)