Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1926 · 33rd Convention, Holy Cross Church › Page 67
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1926, Page 67
front matter 1
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 86
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Sheet 90
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Sheet 95
Page 95
Page 96
Sheet 98
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 108
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Sheet 114
Page 114
Page 115
Page 1186
Sheet 118
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Sheet 124
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Sheet 131
Sheet 132
Page 182
Page 138
Sheet 135
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 146
Page 147
Sheet 149
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Sheet 190
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Sheet 199
Sheet 200
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 208
Page 204
Sheet 206
Page 206
Page 907
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 911
Page 212
Page 218
Page 914
Page 916
Page 216
Sheet 218
Page 218
Sheet 220
Page 220
Sheet 222
Page 222
Page 223
Page 924
Sheet 226
Page 226
Sheet 228
Page 228
Page 929
Page 280
Sheet 232
Page 982
Page 933
Page 234
Page 985
Page 336
Page 237
Page 938
Sheet 240
Page 240
Sheet 242
Page 942
Page 943
Sheet 245
Page 245
Page 246
Page 947
Page 248
Page 949
Sheet 251
Sheet 252
Sheet 253
Sheet 254
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
Ev. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. 1926. 67
President suggested that conferences deliberate whether these two
classes should be added at one or at several colleges at first, or
whether the two new classes should be separated from the present
colleges and a separate institution be maintained for that purpose.
The Arkansas and West Tennessee Pastoral Conference in its
sessions of April 14—17, 1925, at Memphis, Tenn., resolved to make
this overture to Synod (1926) and asks the Western District Synod
to endorse it, with whatever changes it sees fit.
The Arkansas and West Tennessee Pastoral Conference recom:
mends: —
A. That two classes be added to the present college curriculum.
We shall then have a full high school and a full college course.
NB. The reasons for adding two classes in our college course are
obvious : —
a) Demands made upon ministers to-day make it hardly possible
to obtain the proper education in the course of six years.
b) Other Lutheran bodies have already arranged a coursé in-
cluding these two extra classes, and we ought not to fall behind.
B. That for the first these classes be made optional.
NB. If ail the graduates of all our. ‘eolleges entered these extra
classes, Synod would be without graduates from our St. Louis sem-
inary for two years. This would greatly hinder the work which we
are called to do.
C. That a separate institution for the new classes be arranged.
a) This arrangement would insure a greater uniformity in the
studies during the last years of the preparatory course.
b) Students coming from various colleges would be associated
and linked together preparatory to their working together in sem-
inary and Synod.
_¢) For many of. the students it would be a new beginning, with
new environments, a fresh incentive, to finish the two extra classes
at a different school.
d) The special needs of these two classes could be arranged more
easily and more efficiently at one school than at several institutions,
e) The discipline and the regulations for a school-of students in
these extra classes are of a different nature than at a school where
there are young boys of twelve years and upward.
D. That the present seminary buildings at St. Louis be utilized
for the separate institution for these extra classes.
a) This would keep the professors and students in close touch
with the.seminary, which certainly would exert a wholesome in-
fluence, leading to mutual understanding and cooperation.
b) Buildings still in good condition would be made use of and
a saving of money would be effected. For many years to come there
2 ee