Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2007 · 63rd Convention, Houston › Page 165
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 2007, Page 165
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
SYNOD STRUCTURE AND GOVERNANCE
WHEREAS, Neither the words of Jesus in Matt. 18 nor the
words of Luther in the Large Catechism prevent or preclude talking to a brother or sister who has caused offense,
even with a public sin, but both Scripture and the Confessions teach the importance of reconciliation and winning
the brother or sister; therefore be it
Resolved, That we affirm that Matt. 18 does not apply
directly in cases of public sin; and be it further
Resolved, That we affirm the bylaw requirement of faceto-face meetings, even in the case of public sin, toward the
goal of reconciliation and winning the brother or sister; and
be it further
Resolved, That the Commission on Constitutional Matters be directed to bring the Handbook of the Synod into
harmony with the understanding that Matt. 18 does not directly apply to cases of public sin (Bylaw 3.9.2.2.3); and be
it finally
Resolved, That the Synod in convention encourage its
congregations, clergy, commissioned ministers, laity, circuits, and districts to study the CTCR document Public Rebuke of Public Sin and the section on “Ecclesiastical Supervision and Dispute Resolution” in the CTCR Response to
Expressions of Dissent document (CW, pp. 402–405) to address the uncertainty of some in the church related to 2004
Res. 8-01A and the public rebuke of public sin (2004 Res.
8-01A; 2004 Res. 7-02A).
Action: Adopted (10)
(The resolution was read in its entirety as it was introduced by
the committee. During the discussion that followed, the committee agreed to replace recognize with affirm in the first resolve and
to add and to Amend the Synod’s Bylaws Relating to Matthew 18
to the resolution’s title. When a lengthy amendment was offered
expressing concern regarding the ecclesiastical supervisory responsibility of district presidents (printed in Today’s Business, p.
377), the chair was supported in ruling that the amendment was
not germane to the resolution. The resolution was adopted as
changed by the committee [Yes: 950; No: 122].)
To Recommend Further Study
of Composition of Hearing Panels
in Bylaws 2.14, 2.15, and 2.17
RESOLUTION 8-06
Overtures 8-11–30 (CW, pp. 261–272)
WHEREAS, In 2004 Res. 8-01A, the Synod adopted new
procedures for ecclesiastical supervision and dispute resolution; and
WHEREAS, This process has been a blessing to the Synod
in resolving disputes and cases of ecclesiastical supervision
that have arisen since its adoption and in better stewardship of the time and other resources of the Synod; and
WHEREAS, Concerns have been expressed by some regarding the composition of the Hearing Panel under current Bylaws 2.14, 2.15, and 2.17 which makes decisions for
or against an accused member who is facing expulsion from
membership in the Synod; therefore be it
Resolved, That the Synod in convention call for a special
task force to study further the composition of the Hearing
Panel under Bylaws 2.14, 2.15, and 2.17; and be it further
Resolved, That this special task force be comprised of
two members appointed by the Commission on Constitu-
165
tional Matters, one of whom shall be a commissioned minister; two members appointed by the Commission on Structure, one of whom shall be a layperson who is a hearing facilitator; and two district presidents appointed by the
Council of Presidents; and be it finally
Resolved, That this special task force report the results
of its study, and any recommendations that may result
from its study, no later than the 2010 64th Regular Convention of the Synod.
Action: Adopted (10)
(During discussion of the resolution, an amendment to replace
the reference to the 2010 convention in the final resolve with a
reference to the 2009 special convention was offered and then
withdrawn. The resolution was adopted as presented by the committee [Yes: 654; No: 89].)
To Call Special Convention to Amend
Synod Structure and Governance
RESOLUTION 8-07S
Overture 8-67 (CW, p. 283)
WHEREAS, We, the delegates of the 63rd Regular Convention of the Synod, stand ready to meet our responsibility
to serve throughout our three-year term of service; and
WHEREAS, Our Synod has over its history changed its
structure many times in order to meet its changing needs;
and
WHEREAS, Former Synod Presidents Bohlmann and
Kuhn, other current elected leaders, as well as our Council
of Presidents all support having a special convention; and
WHEREAS, Constitution Article XIV 1 states: “Changes
in the Constitution and amendments thereto may be made
provided they do not conflict with the provisions laid down
in Article II and in Article VI”; and
WHEREAS, A two-thirds majority of the votes cast by the
congregations of the Synod is required to ratify any changes
to the Constitution of the Synod for them to become effective (Art. XIV 4); and
WHEREAS, Article VIII B 2 allows for the President of the
Synod with the consent of two-thirds of the district presidents to call special sessions of the Synod; therefore be it
Resolved, That we as delegates of this convention direct
President Kieschnick to meet with the Council of Presidents within the next 90 days, after consulting with our two
seminary presidents, the Commission on Theology and
Church Relations, the Board of Directors, the Vice-President–Finance—Treasurer, other officers of the Synod, and
the Commission on Constitutional Matters; and be it further
Resolved, That if President Kieschnick and two-thirds of
the district presidents determine at that time to call a special convention, we stand ready to serve; and be it finally
Resolved, That no proposed changes to the structure and
governance of the Synod will conflict with Article II and Article VI of the Constitution.
Action: Adopted (10)
(The committee introduced the Res. 8-07A version of this resolution (TB, pp. 213–214) in Session 7, at which time an amendment to insert a new second resolve That since Articles II, VI, and
XIV do not pertain to structure and governance, amendments
thereto are specifically prohibited failed to be adopted. Discussion
continued during Session 9, when the committee presented a sub-
2007 Convention Proceedings