Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2007 · 63rd Convention, Houston › Page 176

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 2007, Page 176

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

176

LATE REPORT

with the vice-presidents of the Synod, appoints one of the
five candidates to each vacant position.
This bylaw was amended by the 2001 convention when a
final step in the appointment process was eliminated. Prior
to this amendment, the appointments by the President of
the Synod became effective only upon ratification by a majority vote of the Council of Presidents. While perhaps not
specifically or directly related to “the matter” referenced in
Resolution 7-02A, the 7-02A Committee believes that the
restoration of the final step in the appointment process that
was eliminated by the 2001 convention will help to restore
confidence in the process. The Committee therefore recommends that current paragraph (d) become paragraph (e)
and that a new paragraph (d) be inserted that will again
require final ratification by the Council of Presidents of the
appointments made by the President of the Synod, the
amended bylaw to read as follows:
PRESENT/PROPOSED WORDING
3.9.2.1.1 The Commission on Constitutional Matters shall be
appointed in the following manner:
(a) Candidates shall be nominated only by the district boards of directors and shall be presented to
the Council of Presidents through the Office of the
Secretary.
(b) The Council of Presidents shall select five candidates for each vacant position and present them
through the office of the Secretary of the Synod to
the President of the Synod.
(c) The President of the Synod, in consultation with
the vice-presidents of the Synod, shall appoint the
members of the commission from the list presented by the Council of Presidents.
(d) Thereafter the appointments shall become effective upon ratification by a majority vote of the
members of the Council of Presidents.
(e) Vacancies in appointed positions shall be filled by
following the procedure set forth above.

— VII —
Re: Bylaw 3.9.2.2
(A) Concern has been expressed that on occasion the
Commission on Constitutional Matters (CCM) has issued
an opinion that has affected an officer or agency of the
Synod but that such officer or agency was unaware of the
question placed before the Commission and thus was unable to furnish information that may have been helpful to
the Commission in arriving at its opinion. Current bylaws
include no provision for informing and inviting input from
officers or agencies affected by requests for opinions. The
7-02A Committee therefore recommends that Bylaw 3.9.2.2
be amended with the addition of new paragraph (b) providing for the notification of an officer or agency when a request for an opinion from the Commission on Constitutional Matters involves an activity of that officer or agency
and providing for an invitation to submit in writing pertinent information regarding the matter(s) at issue.
(B) Present Bylaw 3.9.2.2 (b) states that when opinions
pertain primarily to business, legal, finance, civil rights,
contracts, or property matters, the Commission shall first
consult with the Board of Directors of the Synod and/or the
2007 Convention Proceedings

Synod’s legal counsel. The 7-02A Committee recommends
that this requirement be eliminated in light of its proposal
for the addition of new paragraph (b) whereby the Board as
an officer of the Synod (Constitution Art. V) would necessarily be contacted by the Commission.
(C) Concern has also been expressed that the provisions
of present paragraph 3.9.2.2 (b), which allows opinions of
the Commission to be overruled by a convention of the
Synod, be strengthened to make more certain that such
opinions receive attention by a convention. The 7-02A Committee recommends that this matter be addressed by a new
paragraph (c) to include specific provisions that will assure
that convention overtures that seek to overrule opinions of
the Commission receive appropriate attention.
(D) Finally, present Bylaw 3.9.2.2 (b) states that the
Commission on Constitutional Matters shall interpret the
Synod’s Constitution, Bylaws, and resolutions. Article XI F
2 of the Synod’s Constitution states that the Board of Directors of the Synod is the legal representative of the Synod
and Bylaw 3.3.5.2 states that the Board “shall have the
powers and duties that have been accorded to it by the Articles of Incorporation, Constitution, Bylaws, and resolutions of the Synod, and the laws of the State of Missouri”
(emphasis added). Thus the Synod requires that the Board
be responsive to the laws of the State of Missouri. The Bylaws do not give the Commission on Constitutional Matters
the authority to interpret the laws of the State of Missouri.
The Board alone is vested with the duty to determine the
applicability of such laws as they pertain to the legal, property, and business affairs of the Synod.
Presently there is no clarification in the Bylaws of the
Synod for those relatively rare occasions when the Commission on Constitutional Matters may issue an opinion related to a legal, property, or business matter that determines that the Constitution and/or Bylaws and/or
resolutions of the Synod require a certain conclusion, while
the Board of Directors determines, after consulting with the
Synod’s legal counsel, that the laws of the State of Missouri
require a different conclusion. 1 Corinthians 6:4 admonishes that disputes should be kept within the church. Accordingly, the 7-02A Committee recommends the creation
of a new paragraph (d) for Bylaw 3.9.2.2 to address this situation.
In response to the above concerns, the 7-02A Committee
recommends amendments to Bylaw 3.9.2.2 as follows:
PRESENT/PROPOSED WORDING
3.9.2.2 The Commission on Constitutional Matters shall interpret the Synod’s Constitution, Bylaws, and resolutions
upon the written request of a member (congregation,
ordained or commissioned minister), official, board,
commission, or agency of the Synod.
(a) A request for an opinion may be accompanied by a
request for an appearance before the commission.
(b) The commission shall notify an officer or agency of
the Synod if a request for an opinion involves an activity of that officer or agency and shall allow that
officer or agency to submit in writing information
regarding the matter(s) at issue.
(c) An opinion rendered by the commission shall be
binding on the question decided unless and until it
is overruled by a convention of the Synod. Over-