Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2007 · 63rd Convention, Houston › Page 180
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 2007, Page 180
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
180
LATE OVERTURES
L2-26
To Promote Sound Lutheran
Worship Practices
WHEREAS, The first Synod Constitution was concerned
about the Synod’s congregations adopting the camp revivals
of common American religion, saying,
1. “Especially is Synod to investigate whether its pastors have
permitted themselves to be misled into applying the socalled ‘New Measures’ which have become prevalent here,
or whether they care for their souls according to the sound
Scriptural manner of the orthodox Church” (VI, A, 15), and
2. “Furthermore Synod deems it necessary for the purification
of the Lutheran Church in America, that the emptiness and
the poverty in the externals of the service be opposed,
which, having been introduced here by the false spirit of the
Reformed, is now rampant. All pastors and congregations
that wish to be recognized as orthodox by Synod are prohibited from adopting or retaining any ceremony which might
weaken the confession of the truth or condone or strengthen
a heresy, especially if heretics insist upon the continuation
or the abolishment of such ceremonies” (VI, A, 14b);
and
WHEREAS, The present Constitution of The Lutheran
Church—Missouri Synod, Art. III, point 7 states one of the
objectives of our Synod,
1. “Encourage congregations to strive for uniformity in church
practice, but also to develop an appreciation of a variety of
responsible practices and customs which are in harmony
with our common profession of faith”;
2. And point 1 states another objective of our Synod, “Conserve and promote the unity of the true faith…and provide
a united defense against schism, sectarianism (Rom. 16:17),
and heresy”;
3. And 2004 Synod Bylaw 4.4.4 (b), directs the district president or his representative saying, “In his official visits he
shall seek to bring about to the greatest possible degree the
achievement of the Synod’s objectives as expressed in Art.
III of its Constitution”; and
WHEREAS, Art. VI of the Constitution of The Lutheran
Church—Missouri Synod lists as one of the conditions for
acquiring and holding membership in the Synod,
1. “Exclusive use of doctrinally pure agenda, hymnbooks, and
catechisms in church and school;”
2. And Synod Bylaw 3.9.7.2 (c) (1) states, “All service books
and hymnals that are to be accepted as official service books
and hymnals of the Synod shall be given such status only
by a convention of the Synod after a process of exposure and
testing decided upon by the Synod in convention.”
3. Synod Bylaw 3.9.7.2 (c) lists as one of the functions and duties of the Commission on Worship, “Recommend worship
material to the church and advise and warn against the use
of worship materials that are unworthy of use in the corporate worship of the Lutheran Church,” thereby implying
that not all worship materials are helpful;
and
WHEREAS, In the not too distant past the Commission on
Worship in its report “Reflections on Contemporary/Alternative Worship” (1998 Workbook) warns against too hastily
departing from “the historic pattern of worship that has
been handed down for nearly 2,000 years,” stating, “Wor2007 Convention Proceedings
ship is closely related to other concerns, such as the unity of
the church, formation in the faith, and faithfulness to the
Word of God. A change in worship may indeed signal a
change in doctrine. ‘What is prayed is what is believed’ is
the ancient wisdom of the church. Our Synod founders provided in their constitutions that only ‘purely Lutheran
hymnals, agendas, and textbooks’ could be used in the congregations of the Synod. Out of faithfulness to God, love for
the lost, and concern for future generations, Christians
must pay careful attention to what is confessed in the public worship of the church,” and “Not every form of expression is compatible with the Gospel. Certain styles of music,
for example, are less appropriate than others for the worship of God’s people. For this reason it is essential that the
music appropriately serve the text and not overpower it
with other messages. Style, after all, is not neutral, but is
intrinsically bound up with the substance that it proclaims”; and
Present Synodical Practice
WHEREAS, Our Synod President in his first report to the
2004 convention states, “In the past few decades, numerous congregations of the LCMS have introduced ‘contemporary’ worship forms and music in addition to and, in some
instances, even in place of traditional liturgies and
hymnody. The conditions of membership in the Synod require ‘Exclusive use of doctrinally pure agenda, hymnbooks,
and catechisms in church and school (LCMS Constitution,
Art. VI).’ This presents a dilemma, since our Synod has not
specifically stipulated what these “doctrinally pure” contemporary worship resources for use by our congregations
and professional church workers must be...Whether traditional or contemporary, worship services in congregations
of the LCMS must employ doctrinally pure resources for
the basic elements of distinctively Lutheran Christian worship...The proper utilization of any form must always provide a proper setting for receiving the divine gifts of God
and giving praise and glory to our triune God, Father, Son,
and Holy Spirit”; and
WHEREAS, 2004 Res. 2-04 directed the Commission on
Worship to “initiate a process toward the development of
diverse worship resources for use in The Lutheran Church
—Missouri Synod”; and
WHEREAS, Our President is correct when he concludes,
saying, “The proper utilization of any form must always
provide a proper setting for receiving the divine gifts of God
and giving praise and glory to our triune God, Father, Son,
and Holy Spirit”; and
WHEREAS, “Evangelical Protestant Revivalism” has the
following characteristics where human measures are relied
upon to do the work of Word and Sacrament:
— Sturdy doctrinal hymns are replaced with simplistic repetitive praise songs.
— Doctrinal sermons are replaced with chancel dramas or
how-to sermons for Christian living.
— Creativity and variety are used to keep the experience relevant.
— Worship is made meaningful by meeting the felt needs of
the worshiper.