Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1977 · 52nd Convention, Dallas › Page 173
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1977, Page 173
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Sheet 135
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
RESOLUTIONS
Seminary at Saskatoon, Sask., Canada, who desire to
enter the pastoral ministry of the Synod shall from the
time of enrollment seek the guidance of the faculty
adviser appointed by the Board for Higher Education;
6. To receive an internship (vicarage) assignment in
the LCMS, a student at this seminary shall:
a. be endorsed by the faculty of the seminary as
academically qualified;
b. be examined and endorsed for internship
placement in a LCMS congregation by a board
of examiners consisting of the Presidents of
the Canadian Districts of the Synod, the
designated synodical member of the faculty,
and a member of the Colloquy Board for the
Pastoral Office of the Synod; and
c. be recommended by the synodical professor to
the Council of Presidents acting as the Board
of Assignments;
7. To be accepted into the pastoral ministry of the
Synod and to receive placement, a candidate
shall:
a. be endorsed by the faculty of the seminary as
academically qualified;
b. be examined and endorsed by a board of
examiners consisting of the Presidents of the
Canadian Districts of the Synod, the
designated synodical member of the faculty,
and a member of the Colloquy Board for the
Pastoral Office of the Synod; and
c. be recommended by the synodical professor to
the Council of Presidents acting as the Board
of Assignments;
and be it finally
Resolved, That the Board for Higher Education
restudy the arrangement with Saskatoon and report to
the 1979 convention of the Synod.
Action: Adopted (8).
(Committee 6 had replaced 6-04 with 604A, “To
Regularize Saskatoon Arrangements in Bylaws.” A motion
was made and seconded in Session 2 to eliminate the first
resolve with its proposed Bylaws, leaving only the second
resolve, which asked the BHE to restudy the Saskatoon
arrangement. The motion failed to carry. In Session 8 the
convention permitted the committee to present Res. 6-04Basa
substitute. The principal change lay in substituting temporary
arrangements for proposed Bylaws. Favorable action follow-
ed.)
To Provide for Canadian Operation
of Concordia College, Edmonton
RESOLUTION 6-05A
Overtures 6-62—6-66C (CW, pp. 249—251)
Resolved, That Overture 6-65A be adopted as stated:
WHEREAS, The 1962 convention of the Synod
resolved that the plans and problems necessary for the
development of an indigenous Canadian ministry
require that the future of Edmonton (Concordia) be
considered apart from the long-range plans for the
synodical schools in the United States (Res. 1-16,
Proposition Twenty-two, 1962 Proceedings, p. 78); and
173
WHEREAS, The Board for Higher Education and the
Concordia College, Edmonton, Board of Control have
applied this planning and operating principles for the
past 15 years and have seen the school thrive and
expand in its service to the church in Canada; and
WHEREAS, The Board of Control with the support of
the Alberta and British Columbia District of The
Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod has determined
that the conditions in church and state are such as to
require Canadian control of Concordia College in order
to maximize its contribution to church and society;
therefore be it
Resolved, That Concordia College, Edmonton, Alta.,
Canada, become a church-affiliated college owned by
the LCMS Alberta and British Columbia District and
governed by the Alberta and British Columbia and the
Manitoba and Saskatchewan Districts of the LCMS
until otherwise determined by the LCMS in convention;
and be it further
Resolved, That the Board for Higher Education in
consultation with the Board of Control develop and
implement such policies, regulations, and procedures as
will provide for the orderly assumption of governance
and support of Concordia College, Edmonton, by the
appropriate Canadian authorities.
Action: Adopted (8).
(The committee inserted “Alberta and British Columbia
District” after “LCMS” in the first resolve.)
To Respond to Requests to Move
to 4-Year College Status
RESOLUTION 6-06A
Overtures 6-76—6-77, 6-111U (CW, pp. 253—254;
TB, pp. 18—19)
WHEREAS, Various synodical junior colleges have
expressed the desire to study and move toward 4-year
status; and
WHEREAS, Concordia College of Portland has
submitted detailed studies demonstrating spatial,
educational, and fiscal preparation to move to 4-year
status, thereby meeting specific criteria for a move to
such 4-year status, such as geographic considerations
and density of Lutheran population, as outlined in
Anaheim Res. 6-07A; and
WHEREAS, The Board for Higher Education has
appointed a planning committee to assess the entire
system of seminaries and colleges and the effects of
change upon that system; therefore be it
Resolved, That permission be granted to Concordia,
Portland, to move to 4-year status with subsidy to be
determined according to synodical formula but not to
exceed the current dollar level of synodical subsidy and
with no direct contributions from the respective District
treasuries; and be it further
Resolved, That there be careful cost accounting in
identifying costs of non-church worker programs; and
be it further