Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1977 · 52nd Convention, Dallas › Page 92

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1977, Page 92

Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Sheet 135 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

92 ESSAY AND BIBLE STUDY

He gave His only-begotten Son that whoever believes in
Him should not perish but have eternal life” (John 3:16).
It is only through faith that we appropriate God’s
forgiveness in Christ Jesus. If we could perform good
works sufficient to merit forgiveness, we would not need
forgiveness. But the Law exposes how far short we all
fall. “If Thou, O Lord, shouldst mark iniquities, Lord,
who could stand? But there is forgiveness with Thee,
That thou mayest be feared” (Ps. 130:3-4).

The realization that full forgiveness has already been
won for all sins for all time keeps us from developing any
false notions about faith itself being a good work which
menits forgiveness. Nothing could be farther from the
truth. When the jailor at Philippi cried out in desperation
to Paul and Silas, “What must I do to be saved?” the
response: “Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be
saved,” did not mean that there was one work which he
had to perform in order to be saved, namely, the good
work of believing. If this were the case, then salvation
would not be a free gift. But the Scriptures say: “For by
grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of
yourselves; it is the gift of God; not as a result of works,
that no one should boast” (Eph. 2:8-9). Insofar as it
justifies, faith is not a good work (Ap IV, 56; FC SD III,
13). It is merely the receiving hand by which we
appropriate the forgiveness which God offers us freely
and without condition. Moreover, even our act of
believing is a result of God’s power working in us.

It is only after we have said all of the above that we
are ready to talk about good works. But after we have
said the above, it does become necessary to talk about
good works. Although we dare never let good works
enter into the picture so long as we talk about how we are
made right with God, it is inevitable that good works
follow after faith. If the key word of the first half of 1
Peter 1 is “hope” as a result of the proclamation of the
Gospel, the key word of the second part of the chapter is
“obedience” in response to the Gospel.

The relationship between faith and good works is
signified by the first word in 1 Peter 1:13—“therefore.”
Because God has begotten you again to a living hope by
the resurrection of Christ from the dead, because you
have an incorruptible inheritance, a salvation ready to
be revealed in the last time, therefore, says St. Peter,
become what you are! This is the whole story of
Christian ethics. Good trees produce good fruits. We
receive God’s forgiveness only through faith in the
merits of Christ apart from all our works. But when the
final judgment comes, faith will not be found without
love and good works. On that day, says Christ, the Judge
will say: “Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did
not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to
Me. And these will go away into eternal punishment, but
the righteous into eternal life” (Matt. 25:45-46).

I slept. I dreamed. I seemed to climb a hard
ascending track.
And just behind me labored one whose face was black.
I pitied him, but hour by hour he gained upon my
path.
He stood beside me, stood upright, and then I
turned in wrath.
“Go back,” I cried, “What right have you to
stand beside me here?”

I paused, struck dumb with fear, for lo! the
black man was not there—

But Christ stood in his place! and oh! the
pain, the pain, the pain that looked from
that dear face.

The proper distinction between Law and Gospel in
the area of faith and good works is emphasized in Dr.
Francis Pieper’s striking advice: “Learn to preach the
Gospel, and you have learned the art of making your
people zealous of good works” (Christian Dogmatics,
Vol. I, p. 79). St. John put it best: “Beloved, if God so
loved us, we ought also to love one another” (1 John
4:11).

Ill

On Monday we attempted to set forth clearly and
succinctly the two chief doctrines of the Holy
Scriptures—the Law and the Gospel. Yesterday we
pointed out that the Lutheran Confessions state that
“all Scripture should be divided into these two chief
doctrines” (Ap, IV, 5, emphasis added). We proceeded to
show that, although apparently an easy task to perform
in the abstract, in practice it is impossible to make this
distinction apart from the power of the Holy Spirit. The
devil is especially effective in causing us to confuse Law
and Gospel with respect to the relationship between
faith and works. To those stricken by the knowledge of
their sin, the old evil foe proposes good works as the
solution to their predicament.

The notion that God’s good favor can be gained
through good works takes many forms. One of the most
subtle is the suggestion that the promises of the Gospel
are dependent upon at least one good work, namely, the
good work of faith. That is why it was necessary for us to
show that the faith by which we appropriate the Gospel
promises is not itself a good work which merits
forgiveness.

In order to illustrate this important point, we turn
once again to Bo Giertz’s The Hammer of God. A young
pastor by the name of Fridfeldt, a member of a pietistic
movement in 19th-century Sweden, had just arrived to
serve as an assistant to the veteran rector of Odesjo.
Somewhat troubled and apprehensive because the old
pastor had taken a glass of brandy after dinner, the
young pastor felt constrained to make a confession of his
faith and to inform his superior exactly where he stood.
Said Fridfeldt:

“T just want you to know from the beginning, sir, that I
am a believer...” His voice was a bit harsh.

He saw a gleam in the old man’s eyes which he could not
quite interpret. Was approval indicated, or did he have
something up his sleeve?

The rector put the lamp back on the table, puffed at his
pipe, and looked at the young man a moment before he
spoke.

“So you are a believer, I’m glad to hear that. What do
you believe in?”

Fridfeldt stared dumfounded at his superior. Was he
jesting with him?

“But, sir, 1 am simply saying that I am a believer.”

“Yes, [hear that, my boy. But whatisit that you believe
in?”

Fridfeldt was almost speechless.

“But don’t you know, sir, what it means to be a
believer?”

“That is a word which can stand for things that differ
greatly, my boy. I ask only what it is that you believe in.”