Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1977 · 52nd Convention, Dallas › Page 92
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1977, Page 92
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Sheet 135
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
92 ESSAY AND BIBLE STUDY
He gave His only-begotten Son that whoever believes in
Him should not perish but have eternal life” (John 3:16).
It is only through faith that we appropriate God’s
forgiveness in Christ Jesus. If we could perform good
works sufficient to merit forgiveness, we would not need
forgiveness. But the Law exposes how far short we all
fall. “If Thou, O Lord, shouldst mark iniquities, Lord,
who could stand? But there is forgiveness with Thee,
That thou mayest be feared” (Ps. 130:3-4).
The realization that full forgiveness has already been
won for all sins for all time keeps us from developing any
false notions about faith itself being a good work which
menits forgiveness. Nothing could be farther from the
truth. When the jailor at Philippi cried out in desperation
to Paul and Silas, “What must I do to be saved?” the
response: “Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be
saved,” did not mean that there was one work which he
had to perform in order to be saved, namely, the good
work of believing. If this were the case, then salvation
would not be a free gift. But the Scriptures say: “For by
grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of
yourselves; it is the gift of God; not as a result of works,
that no one should boast” (Eph. 2:8-9). Insofar as it
justifies, faith is not a good work (Ap IV, 56; FC SD III,
13). It is merely the receiving hand by which we
appropriate the forgiveness which God offers us freely
and without condition. Moreover, even our act of
believing is a result of God’s power working in us.
It is only after we have said all of the above that we
are ready to talk about good works. But after we have
said the above, it does become necessary to talk about
good works. Although we dare never let good works
enter into the picture so long as we talk about how we are
made right with God, it is inevitable that good works
follow after faith. If the key word of the first half of 1
Peter 1 is “hope” as a result of the proclamation of the
Gospel, the key word of the second part of the chapter is
“obedience” in response to the Gospel.
The relationship between faith and good works is
signified by the first word in 1 Peter 1:13—“therefore.”
Because God has begotten you again to a living hope by
the resurrection of Christ from the dead, because you
have an incorruptible inheritance, a salvation ready to
be revealed in the last time, therefore, says St. Peter,
become what you are! This is the whole story of
Christian ethics. Good trees produce good fruits. We
receive God’s forgiveness only through faith in the
merits of Christ apart from all our works. But when the
final judgment comes, faith will not be found without
love and good works. On that day, says Christ, the Judge
will say: “Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did
not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to
Me. And these will go away into eternal punishment, but
the righteous into eternal life” (Matt. 25:45-46).
I slept. I dreamed. I seemed to climb a hard
ascending track.
And just behind me labored one whose face was black.
I pitied him, but hour by hour he gained upon my
path.
He stood beside me, stood upright, and then I
turned in wrath.
“Go back,” I cried, “What right have you to
stand beside me here?”
I paused, struck dumb with fear, for lo! the
black man was not there—
But Christ stood in his place! and oh! the
pain, the pain, the pain that looked from
that dear face.
The proper distinction between Law and Gospel in
the area of faith and good works is emphasized in Dr.
Francis Pieper’s striking advice: “Learn to preach the
Gospel, and you have learned the art of making your
people zealous of good works” (Christian Dogmatics,
Vol. I, p. 79). St. John put it best: “Beloved, if God so
loved us, we ought also to love one another” (1 John
4:11).
Ill
On Monday we attempted to set forth clearly and
succinctly the two chief doctrines of the Holy
Scriptures—the Law and the Gospel. Yesterday we
pointed out that the Lutheran Confessions state that
“all Scripture should be divided into these two chief
doctrines” (Ap, IV, 5, emphasis added). We proceeded to
show that, although apparently an easy task to perform
in the abstract, in practice it is impossible to make this
distinction apart from the power of the Holy Spirit. The
devil is especially effective in causing us to confuse Law
and Gospel with respect to the relationship between
faith and works. To those stricken by the knowledge of
their sin, the old evil foe proposes good works as the
solution to their predicament.
The notion that God’s good favor can be gained
through good works takes many forms. One of the most
subtle is the suggestion that the promises of the Gospel
are dependent upon at least one good work, namely, the
good work of faith. That is why it was necessary for us to
show that the faith by which we appropriate the Gospel
promises is not itself a good work which merits
forgiveness.
In order to illustrate this important point, we turn
once again to Bo Giertz’s The Hammer of God. A young
pastor by the name of Fridfeldt, a member of a pietistic
movement in 19th-century Sweden, had just arrived to
serve as an assistant to the veteran rector of Odesjo.
Somewhat troubled and apprehensive because the old
pastor had taken a glass of brandy after dinner, the
young pastor felt constrained to make a confession of his
faith and to inform his superior exactly where he stood.
Said Fridfeldt:
“T just want you to know from the beginning, sir, that I
am a believer...” His voice was a bit harsh.
He saw a gleam in the old man’s eyes which he could not
quite interpret. Was approval indicated, or did he have
something up his sleeve?
The rector put the lamp back on the table, puffed at his
pipe, and looked at the young man a moment before he
spoke.
“So you are a believer, I’m glad to hear that. What do
you believe in?”
Fridfeldt stared dumfounded at his superior. Was he
jesting with him?
“But, sir, 1 am simply saying that I am a believer.”
“Yes, [hear that, my boy. But whatisit that you believe
in?”
Fridfeldt was almost speechless.
“But don’t you know, sir, what it means to be a
believer?”
“That is a word which can stand for things that differ
greatly, my boy. I ask only what it is that you believe in.”