Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1977 · 52nd Convention, Dallas › Page 22
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1977, Page 22
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Sheet 135
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
22 MINUTES OF THE CONVENTION
President’s Report
President Preus began his report by pointing out
that the first section of the report had been presented
when the convention committees gathered for the
preparation of resolutions and that this section of the
report had been sent to all delegates. He began the
second section of his report by expressing his thanks
for the prayers, moral and financial support, and other
assistance which had been given by all of the members
of the Synod, with special reference to the efforts of Dr.
Nickel, Third Vice-President of the Synod, Dr.
Carpenter, the synodical Treasurer, Dr. E. C. Weber,
First Vice-President of the Synod, and Dr. Robert
Sauer, assistant to the President of the Synod. He also
pointed out that the second section of his report, which
would be included in an issue of Today’s Business,
would include appendices reporting the disposition of
matters which had been assigned to the President’s
office by the convention at Anaheim as well as a listing
of congregations who have left the Synod and those
who hold dual membership in The Lutheran Church—
Missouri Synod and the AELC, together with the
situation of pastors in these congregations. Another
appendix would include a list of the congregations who
have joined the Synod during the past biennium.
President Preus continued his report by pointing to
the positive achievements of the Synod in recent years.
He indicated that in 1976 the Synod had reached its
highest membership in its 130 years of history. It had
also achieved the highest total and per-capita giving
for all work, amounting to over $375,000,000. In the
past biennium 1,100 young people have been added to
the list of professional church workers. Concordia
Seminary in St. Louis, which had a total enrollment of
90 students in 1974, had increased to 360 in 1977. The
latest reports in the Synod point out that 338,000 are
enrolled in Bible classes, the highest number which has
ever been enrolled. Several corners have been turned,
including a stemming of back-door losses, which have
begun to decline as a result of evangelism training and
workshops. Another corner which has been turned was
that of adult accessions, which have begun to increase
once again and last year totaled over 27,000.
Of the hundreds of meetings requiring presidential
attendance, President Preus cited two which were
especially important. The first of these was held in
Porto Alegre in 1975, a meeting of partner churches of
The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod. The second
meeting was held in 1977 in Hong Kong and was the
first international mission planning conference. Dr.
Preus stated that it was his belief that if all of the
members of our church could have been present at these
meetings, they would have been inspired to move
forward and there would be no lack of funds or effort
expended to share the Gospel with the world. Among
other positive things to which President Preus pointed
were the fact that we have the marvelous grace of God
in Christ Jesus, that we are a confessional church and
are not afraid to put on paper what our church stands
for, and that we have a congregational form of church
government in which all are part of the action.
In referring to the future, President Preus pointed to
certain things which could be described as stones in the
cathedral for the future. Among these are the “Year of
the Sunday School” and the Bible study program
entitled “That We May Grow.” Others include efforts at
improving interchurch relationships, the Black Centen-
nial, our concern for suffering, a national youth
organization which is to be considered by the conven-
tion, the educational program of our Synod, efforts at
reconstruction and restoration of the circuits, and the
contributions of $375,000,000 for all work of the Synod
and its congregations.
While all these are positive factors, President Preus
stated that there is apathy, uncertainty, and ignorance
and that one of the purposes of a convention is to
inspire delegates to go home and inspire the members
of the circuits which they represent. He stated that we
must get away from thinking that to be orthodox is to
be against something. It includes positively being for
something, for the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Dr. Preus
concluded his statements with the prayer that we may
grow in faith, hope, and love.
Standing Rules
Dr. Herbert Mueller, Secretary of the Synod,
addressed the delegates, pointing out that special
standing rules adopted at the Anaheim convention had
also been approved by that convention to serve as
temporary rules for the present convention. Further-
more, a Convention Format Committee was continued
to consider any change in rules which should be
presented for the present convention. This committee
had considered the convention format and proposed
special standing rules as found on page 8 of Today’s
Business. The proposed rules were then adopted by the
delegates as the standing rules for the present conven-
tion.
Constitutional Matters and
Registration and Credentials
Dr. Richard Schlecht, President of the Michigan
District and chairman of the Committee on Con-
stitutional Matters, presented Res. 5-01 (TB 99) to the
delegates. This resolution asked the delegates to declare
the Synod’s position on the Association of Evangelical
Lutheran Churches, especially dual membership in The
Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod and the Association
of Evangelical Lutheran Churches. Prior to the reading
of the resolution several changes were made. In lines 34
and 35 (TB 99) the numbers 52 and 93 were changed to 45
and 107 respectively. The names which had been
omitted on lines 60 and 61 (TB 99) were included. These
names are Dr. Michael Stelmachowicz, Dr. Otto A. Dorn,
and Pastor Louis Meyer. In line 72 (TB 99) the words
“where conversations are taking place and where
progress is being made toward what seems to be an
imminent resolution,” were placed between the words
“case” and “such.”
After the reading of this resolution the President of
the Synod declared that parliamentarily Res. 1-01 (TB
36) should be read since it was related to Res. 5-01 (TB
99), but that before action would be taken on this
resolution action should be completed on Res. 5-01.