Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1973 · 50th Convention › Page 128

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1973, Page 128

front matter 1 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 148 Sheet 143 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

128 RESOLUTIONS

Wueneas, A Statement, in its entirety, has been pre-
sented to the congregations and clergy of the Synod,
and during the past 16 months has been studied and
discussed throughout the church, and has been ap-
proved by various synodical boards (Board of Control,
Springfield; Board for Higher Education) and congre-
gations; and

Wuereas, The Lutheran church in the past, when
confronted with doctrinal controversy and crisis, has
accepted expressions of belief which are in agreement
with Scripture and the Lutheran Confessions, e. g., the
Thirteen Theses of Doctor Walther, 1881; therefore be it

Resolved, That The Lutheran Church — Missouri
Synod declare A Statement of Scriptural and Confes-
sional Principles, in all its parts, to be Scriptural and
in accord with the Lutheran Confessions, and therefore
a formulation which derives its authority from the Word
of God and which expresses the Synod’s position on
current doctrinal issues; and be it further

Resolved, That The Lutheran Church — Missouri
Synod declare A Statement of Scriptural and Confes-
sional Principles to be a “more formal and comprehen-
sive statement of belief” in the sense of Resolution 5-24
of the 1971 Milwaukee convention, and that the Synod
further declare that A Statement shall hold the status
defined in said resolution (Preamble, above).

Action: Adopted (10).

(This resolution was discussed in Session 8. When the
automatic call for the question was put after 30 minutes it
failed to carry by the necessary two-thirds vote. A motion
to extend the time of the session also failed. In Session 10
the resolution was taken up again. A motion that this matter
and similar resolutions be referred to the Council of Presi-
dents was declined, as well as an amendment concerning the
use of A Statement. Finally the convention resolved to close
debate by a vote of 580 to 429, a clear majority of the regis-
tered voting delegates under a special rule adopted in Ses-
sion 9. The assembly by a vote of 579 to 386 upheld the rul-
ing of the chair with respect to the amended standing rules
of the convention. The resolution was then adopted by a vote
of 562 to 455. A demonstration of protest followed. See Min-
utes for Sessions 8 and 10.)

To Change Bylaws of the “Handbook”
as Recommended by the Special Task Force
on Accreditation

RESOLUTION 3-02

Reports 3-01D, 4-04, V, I; Overtures 3-81A—D, 3-83, 3-93,
3-94, 3-96—3-100; Referred Resolutions 5-47, 5-92, 6-01
(CW, pp. 107-117, 141—145, 172, 424—426)

Wuereas, The Special Task Force on Accreditation
has carefully studied the synodical Bylaws in an effort
to protect the interests of the Synod and to meet the
concerns of the American Association of Theological
Schools; and

Wuereas, The Handbook changes recommended by
the Special Task Force on Accreditation protect the
rights and interests of the Synod and meet its needs;
and

Whereas, Carefully spelled out procedures are nec-
essary in cases in which a faculty member is charged

with offenses which may result in dismissal or termina-
tion of tenure under present Handbook Section 6.77; and

Wuereas, The procedures spelled out under pro-
posed Handbook Section 6.77, Removal from Office, pro-
vide protection to the Synod, to faculty members, and
to complainants; and

Wuerras, The granting of tenure is generally ac-
cepted in educational circles, and the procedures rec-
ommended by the Special Task Force on Accreditation
in proposed Handbook Section 6.54 provide adequate
safeguards to the interests of both faculty members and
the Synod; and

Wuereas, The Handbook changes proposed by the
Special Task Force on Accreditation in proposed Sec-
tions 1.09d, 1.09e, and 6.80 clearly place pastor and
teacher faculty members under ecclesiastical jurisdic-
tion just as other pastors and teachers are; and

Wuereas, The Commission on Accrediting of the
AATS has given assurance that the proposed Bylaw
changes “should provide adequate legal structures for
the determination of policy and operation of the sem-
inary (Concordia Seminary, St. Louis) by its Board of
Contro]” and for “the matter of due process with regard
to adequate procedural protection of the academic free-
dom of faculty in Concordia Seminary in St. Louis”;
therefore be it

Resolved, That the following proposed Bylaw
changes be made in the Handbook:

1.09 Relation of the Synod to its Members

a. (Remains as is)

b. (Remains as is)

c. (Remains as is)

d. Clergy and teacher members of the Synod
shall hold their synodical membership in that Dis-
trict in which the congregation they serve holds
membership or in which they are serving as District
executives. Clergy and teacher members of the
Synod who are serving an educational institution
of the Synod shall be under the ecclesiastical super-
vision of the President of the geographical District
in which the institution is located.

e. While retaining the right of brotherly dissent,
members of the Synod are expected as part of the
life together within the synodical fellowship to
honor and to uphold the resolutions of the Synod.
If such resolutions are of a doctrinal nature, dissent
is to be expressed first within the fellowship of
peers, then brought to the attention of the Com-
mission on Theology and Church Relations before
finding expression as an overture to the convention
calling for revision or recision. While the con-
science of the dissenter shall be respected, the
consciences of others, as well as the collective will
of the Synod, shall also be respected.

2.143 Duties of the Committee for Convention
Nominations

a. (Remains as is)

b. The committee shall inform itself as to the
duties and requirements of each position to be
filled and be thereby guided in its selection of
nominees. In the case of the Boards of Control 0
synodical institutions the committee shall consult
with the Board for Higher Education and receive
their nominations for the various Boards of Control
for their consideration.

(Last sentence in b represents change)