Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1973 · 50th Convention › Page 74

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1973, Page 74

front matter 1 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 148 Sheet 143 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

76 THE CONVENTION ESSAY

too, would emulate their spirit of service and sacrifice
and give also all in His service!
Remembering them we join in the words of St. Paul
to Philemon in verses 4-7:
I’m always thanking my God when I mention you in
my prayers, because I hear how you believe in the Lord
Jesus and love Him and all the holy people, so that, know-
ing every good thing you have in Christ, you vigorously
share your faith. Your love delighted and encouraged

me very much because you, my fellow Christian, have
refreshed the hearts of our holy people.

Today we thank God for His love to those who went
before us and vigorously shared their faith with us,
making this assembly possible. Amen.

II

Missouri’s Founding

“How quaint.” “How sweet!” we say as we look at
the faded wedding photographs of our great-grandpar-
ents! But how often do we take the time to go beyond
the photograph and look at the lives and loves of our
antecedents? Too often this is the mistake we make
when we look at our church organization, The Lutheran
Church — Missouri Synod. As we do with an aged
photograph, we give our church a passing glance and
immediately go back to the business at hand. We
naively assume that four or five generations ago the
church had no problems and that nothing really ever
happened. This attitude reminds one of the timid old
bachelor who was encouraged to seek a wife. He
glanced at his parents and innocently replied: “Papa
married Mama, and now you want me to get married
to a total stranger!”

Let us now look at some of the steps of the “court-
ship” necessary before The Lutheran Church — Missouri
Synod could be organized 126 years ago.

Back in Europe, there were three theological pres-
sures which affected the founders:

1, Orthodoxy —a soundness of doctrine as revealed
in the Word of God and as enunciated in the
Lutheran Confessions;

2. Pietism — with a deep concern for the develop-
ment of the spiritual life, less emphasis of the
intellectual and more of the emotional aspects —
a religion of feeling rather than belief or confes-
sion;

3. Rationalism — which challenged both orthodoxy
and pietism, emphasizing that neither the emotion
nor Scriptures, but reason ought to be the final
authority in all religion. Common sense must
dictate belief and morality, they held. Under ra-
tionalism the Bible was studied as any other lit-
erature.

Orthodoxy had been fairly dominant in the church
up to about 1675, when pietism was on the increase.
But rationalism soon challenged both so that an ob-
server commented that by 1819 four fifths of the edu-
cated class, one fifth of the middle class and one third
of the peasants had been converted to rationalism. (Ru-

dolf Herrmann, Thuringische Kirchengeschichte [Wei-
mar; Hermann Bohlaus Nachfolger, 1947] 2, p. 388)

The rationalism, then active, was considered to be
an emancipation from the authority of Scripture and the
Confessions. This stance was typically expressed by
G. J. Planck (1751—1833), a professor at Géttingen:

Not only the forms, but also the basic ideas of the older
theologians have been almost universally abandoned. We
are aware that we have departed from them. And no one
any longer fears that the spirit of our theology could on
its own ever return to or even be forced back to them.
For this reason these ideas are regarded as entirely in-
consequential antiquities. [G. J. Planck, Geschichte der
Entstehung ... unsers protestantischen Lehrbegriffs,
1796, IV, p. vii, quoted in Emanuel Hirsch, Lutherstudien
(Giitersloh: C. Bertelsmann, 1954), II, p. 123]

When the officialdom of the state churches of some
of the German provinces joined hands in supporting
rationalism, and attempted to force the Lutherans and
the Reformed churches into a union in 1817, at first
criticisms, and subsequently violent reactions, set in.
Parish pastors, laymen, and university professors op-
posed the rationalism and dictation from the state. The
new movement was variously called “The Awakening,”
“Old Lutheranism,” and “Confessionalism.”

On the eve of the Reformation in 1817, Klaus Harms,
(1778—1855) one of the foremost Lutheran theologians
in the early part of the 19th century, spoke out forcefully
with his own new set of 95 theses. He described the
conditions in the church:

Reason is running wildly through the Lutheran church;
it tears Christ from the altar, flings God’s Word out of
the pulpit, throws slime into the water of Baptism... .
[Klaus Harms, Lebensbeschreibung (Kiel: Akademischer
Buchhandling, 1851), p. 237)

The number of clergy and laymen returning to the
study of the Lutheran Confessions, declaring their ad-
herence to the old faith and rising in opposition to the
church and state, was constantly growing. Most of the
worship services and schools were conducted by ration-
alistic clergymen and teachers. As the only possible
escape from the rationalistic pressure, confessional Lu-
therans began to conduct services in private homes.
Laymen frequently were called on to conduct worship
services because of a shortage of orthodox clergymen.
Pressures began to mount, and the governing authori-
ties did not hesitate to suspend orthodox clergymen
from their pastoral offices, and even to send troops into
the services, disrupting the worship and arresting the
worshipers.

May I share with you just one example of rationalis-
tic preaching? In his Christmas sermon on the familiar
Gospel: “And they came in haste and found Mary and
Joseph, and the Babe lying in a manger,” one of the
rationalistic pastors exhorted his farmers to exercise
greater care in feeding their cattle! (Max von Boehn:
Biedermeier Deutschland 1815—57 [Berlin: Bruno Ca-
sirer, 1911], pp. 211—214)

At the same time, pietistic, evangelically minded stu-
dents gathered for personal devotion at the universities.
Such a “holy club” existed at the University of Leipzig
which included students Walther, Fuerbringer, Brohm,
Keyl, Buerger, Buenger, and others. With deeply dis-

sce inp eneciees catmmnentyaanye Camm t

Sen nnn ctamiummadiandimaadmnanthementmmmamamenntaaciarazadietedanntien dando emmenanenaiieicinnconmarabaaeeaindmmnaamaaal

cere he eet A NRE ROM eee

5
fi
i
F
é