Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1973 · 50th Convention › Page 82

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1973, Page 82

front matter 1 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 148 Sheet 143 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

82 THE CONVENTION ESSAY

The principle of involving laymen not only in dol-
lars, but also in doctrine, was consistently applied dur-
ing the conferences with other Lutheran bodies in sub-
sequent years. Today one need only look at the struc-
ture of our synodical boards and commissions and the
operation of Concordia Publishing House as evidence
of the important role of the laity.

Two factors thus gave the Missouri Synod a tremen-
dous power pack: its theology and its lay involvement.
At the heart and center of its theology and proclama-
tion has always been Christ the crucified. The oneness
in spirit among the clergy, teachers, and laity had its
source in the Cross. Whether one looks at obituaries
published or news items, or an elaboration of a theologi-
cal position, Christ the crucified remained central.

There have been times in the history of the Synod —
as there may well be at this convention — when some
thought that the future of the Synod rested exclusively
upon the abilities and decisions of people. A review
of the past 126 years, however, will quickly remind us
that the church did not grow, expand, or move forward
because of puny men, but in spite of them. To the Lord
of the church who has “purchased and won” each indi-
vidual member and still contines to direct and control
all affairs — to Him belongs all praise and glory.

H. C. Schwan, a former president of the Synod, put
it so succinctly when he spoke of the unifying factor in
the Synod:

What has kept us together until now was not our Con-
stitution as good as it is, not the personality of those who
bear the highest synodical offices. No, it was something
radically different, something which God Himself has
given us. This was the unity of spirit and faith, We
remained together outwardly because we are one in-
wardly....

... As long as we by God’s grace remain one in heart

and soul through the Word and faith, then our bond of

fellowship and the continued existence of the Synod will
not be seriously challenged. If this [spirit] is ever lost,
then no Constitution will coerce those who rebel, and
the resultant cooperation will be of no value. {Missouri

Synod Proceedings, 1884, p. 30]

The writer to the Hebrews summarizes what we have
been trying to convey:

Remember your leaders who told you God’s Word. Con-

sider how their lives ended, and imitate their faith. Jesus

Christ is the same yesterday, today, and forever. Don’t

get carried away with different kinds of strange teach-

ings. It is good to be inwardly strengthened by God’s

love... . [Hebrews 13:7-9]

As we remember our leaders and look at Jesus Christ
as the same yesterday, today, and forever, the theologi-
cal power pack will continue to be available to us today
and into the future. It is Christ Himself. Amen.

IV

Launched Into Service

The space platform launched last May required
923,800 gallons of liquid oxygen, hydrogen, and kerosene
in order to produce the necessary 8,850,000 pounds of
thrust in order to launch it. An unbelievable amount
of power! In contrast, our Synod had and still has an

even greater thrust or power, the Gospel of our Lord
Jesus Christ through the power of the Holy Spirit, the
theological power pack as we saw yesterday. Whenever
we have failed to use this power, and instead have
looked to people, to organizations, and to gimmicks, as
the source of power, we have failed. But we take com-
fort in our anniversary theme, “Rejoicing in Mercy.”

Today we will glance at the work and service of the
Synod motivated by its theological “power pack.” We
do this on the basis of St. Paul’s second letter to the
Corinthians 13: 7-9:

Examine yourselves to see if you really believe. Test

yourselves. Don’t you know Jesus Christ is in you—

unless you fail in your test? I hope you’ll see we haven't
failed in our test. We pray God you will do no wrong —
not to show we haven’t failed, but we want you to do
what is right even if we may seem to have failed. We
can’t do anything against the truth but only work for it.

We are glad when we’re weak and you're strong. And

we're praying that you may grow to be perfect.

What gave the Missouri Synod its motive power, its
“spirit”? Some have suggested that it was motivated
by a sort of ecclesiastical imperialism similar to Ger-
man nationalism which chanted “Deutschland, Deutsch-
land, iiber Alles!” Others have identified it as a blind
commitment either to a leadership or to an ideology.

After reviewing our past 125 years, one must admit
that there is a blind commitment, a sacrificial dedication,
a compulsion to serve. But not to a leader, to an insti-
tution, or to an organization, or even to a convention
resolution. Much rather, it is an unyielding commit-
ment to the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ. Like Saint
Paul, who felt an inner compulsion in his restless dedi-
cation and commitment to Christ, so the members of
the Synod felt that the Gospel must be proclaimed;
Christ’s people must be served!

At the time of its founding in 1847, the Synod con-
sisted of some 23 pastors and 5 teachers serving 12 mem-
ber and 7 nonmember congregations. Its baptized mem-
bership was slightly more than 4,000, the equivalent of
one of our largest congregations today! These limited
members have grown to 3,057,000 baptized members
and 2,136,500 communicant members in 6,000 congrega-
tions. Today the church has three times as many pas-
tors and teachers as it had members at the time of its
founding.

Statistics can be misleading. Nevertheless it is inter-
esting to note that during its first full decade of exis-
tence, from 1850 to 1859, the membership increased
343%! A similar growth rate continued during the 19th
century, declining in the first decades of the 20th cen-
tury, but increasing to 65% in the 1950s and 24% in
the 1960s. Recent “backdoor” losses which in 1972
amounted to 52,012 must be of deep concern!

Today we will briefly survey some aspects of the
Synod’s work produced by its theological power pack.
I wish we had the time for a thorough look at the mis-
sion outreach, the educational enterprise, and the wel-
fare work because it is, indeed, a thrilling and gripping
story. We are the heirs of this goodly heritage.