Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2023 · 68th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 386
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2023, Page 386
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
front matter 19
front matter 20
front matter 21
front matter 22
front matter 23
front matter 24
front matter 25
front matter 26
front matter 27
front matter 28
front matter 29
front matter 30
front matter 31
front matter 32
front matter 33
front matter 34
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Page 395
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Page 399
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Page 410
Page 411
Page 412
Page 413
Page 414
Page 415
Page 416
Page 417
Page 418
Page 419
Page 420
Page 421
Page 422
Page 423
Page 424
Page 425
Page 426
Page 427
Page 428
Page 429
Page 430
Page 431
Page 432
Page 433
Page 434
Page 435
Page 436
Page 437
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
386
STRUCTURE AND ADMINISTRATION
Ov. 9-31
Ov. 9-30
To Have Next Available Convention
of the Synod in Detroit
WHEREAS, Detroit, Mich., has not hosted a Convention of The
Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod (LCMS) since 1965; and
WHEREAS, Since the Pittsburgh Convention in 1992, the LCMS
has deemed it wise to move the triennial Synod Convention to
various cities across the United States, assuming competitive rates
for hotels, travel, and convention sites, and thus helping create a
deeper appreciation for our Synod and her faithful, biblical,
doctrinal stances, confession, and practices; and
WHEREAS, The Detroit metropolitan area has a historically large
LCMS population and has notable historic congregations,
cemeteries, and history, as well as nearby Concordia University
Ann Arbor, and is a major international airport and a hub of Delta
Air Lines; and
WHEREAS, Synod Bylaw 3.1.9 (j)(3) states that “A district may
submit an invitation to host the convention. In such case, a host
group shall determine the minimum requirements from the
convention manager, agree to provide any needed local support, and
submit a proposal to the Board of Directors of the Synod for
evaluation and consideration”; and
WHEREAS, The Michigan District and English District have
headquarters buildings in the nearby area, and our partner synod,
The Lutheran Church—Canada, has a concentration of
congregations in Ontario and just across the Detroit River in
Windsor and nearby counties; and
WHEREAS, The Michigan District and English District could
team together in hosting the convention; and
WHEREAS, Significant Lutheran heritage and sightseeing is
available in relatively close Frankenmuth, Mich., as well as in
Dearborn, Mich. (including the Henry Ford Museum and Greenfield
Village) and other cultural and sports amenities; and
WHEREAS, The Detroit metro area is a huge mission field, a
highly multi-ethnic milieu, and one of the largest Black
concentrations in the nation at a time when it would be wise for the
LCMS to show its support of the Black community, in particular;
and
WHEREAS, The Detroit metro area is also home to a huge mission
field of Arabic and Islamic peoples who need to hear the Gospel of
life and salvation in Jesus Christ; and
WHEREAS, The Detroit area congregations, schools, pastors, and
church workers have demonstrated a high level of confessional
witness and missionary support (one of the OIM Regional Director
families is from Windsor, ON, and a member of a Detroit
congregation); therefore be it
Resolved, That the English District, together with the Michigan
District, determine to act as host by determining the minimum
requirements from the convention manager, agreeing to provide any
needed local support, and submitting a proposal to the Synod Board
of Directors; and be it further
Resolved, That upon consultation and approval from the Synod
Board of Directors, the English District, together with the Michigan
District, invite the next available Synod convention to Detroit after
the 2023 Synod convention.
English District
2023 Convention Workbook
To Restore Direct Voting by Congregations
to All Changes in, and Amendments to, the Synod’s
Constitution and Bylaws
Preamble
Self-governance by The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
(LCMS) congregations is a fundamental and historical principle of
how we as congregations come together as a Synod and walk
together. Over the years, our governing documents (Constitution
and Bylaws) have changed from unanimous congregational consent
by each individual congregation to a representative determination
through convention. This change alters the role of the individual
congregations and deprives them of a direct vote in the structure of
their governance. Self-governance is more than control over what
we do as individual congregations internally; it is how we as
collective churches relate. This overture seeks to restore the right of
all congregations to exercise self-governance over changes in
Synod governance.
Rationale
The founders of the early LCMS, especially C.F.W. Walther, were
very protective of the self-governance of the individual
congregations, so much so that the Synod’s first Constitution could
only be changed through the unanimous approval of all
congregations.
The self-governance of our LCMS congregations is a fundamental
and historical principal of how we as congregations come together
as the Synod and how we are “walking together.”
Over the years, our governing documents have been changed to shift
the self-governance by the individual congregations to
representative determinations by the Synod in conventions.
• Constitution Article XV 2–3 requires a two-thirds vote of the
convention to send any constitutional amendment to the
congregations for ratification. Conversely, one-third of the
convention delegates can deny any proposed amendment
from reaching the congregations.
• Bylaw chapter 7, “Amendments to Bylaws” allows all
changes and amendments to the bylaws to be solely decided
by the convention, thereby completely circumventing
congregational approval.
This governance is contrary to the Synod’s founders view of selfgovernance which is expressed in the first Synod Constitution of
1847 Article VII, “About changing the constitution”:
Changes in and additions to the constitution may be made if they
are not contrary to the propositions set forth in the second article
of the present constitution and if all members of Synod, at the
order of their congregations, to whom the matters have been
presented a year in advance, unanimously adopt them. All
proposed changes must be presented one year in advance to all
congregations, and the vote for the changes must be unanimous.
This expression by the Synod’s founders shows that selfgovernance is more than control over what is done as individual
congregation; it is how the Synod as collective churches relate.
Therefore be it
Resolved, That henceforth all changes to the Synod’s
Constitution and Bylaws will be decided by direct vote to all
member congregations; and be it further
Resolved, That Const. Art. XV be amended as follows: