Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2023 · 68th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 139
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2023, Page 139
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
front matter 19
front matter 20
front matter 21
front matter 22
front matter 23
front matter 24
front matter 25
front matter 26
front matter 27
front matter 28
front matter 29
front matter 30
front matter 31
front matter 32
front matter 33
front matter 34
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Page 395
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Page 399
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Page 410
Page 411
Page 412
Page 413
Page 414
Page 415
Page 416
Page 417
Page 418
Page 419
Page 420
Page 421
Page 422
Page 423
Page 424
Page 425
Page 426
Page 427
Page 428
Page 429
Page 430
Page 431
Page 432
Page 433
Page 434
Page 435
Page 436
Page 437
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
OFFICER, BOARD, AND COMMISSION REPORTS
Synod. The committee then received further input from the Synod
Board of Directors, CUS board of directors, the CUS institutions
presidents, CUS institutions board of regents chairs, the Synod
President, synodwide corporate entities, and others regarding the
draft overture and comments received. Under the direction of the
Board of Directors, the committee then proceeded to make changes
to the draft overture to take into consideration the comments and
input that had been received.
By Feb. 2022, the committee was prepared to submit to the
Synod Board of Directors a revised proposed overture that took
into consideration the comments received during the previous year.
The decision to delay the 2022 Synod convention to July 2023
provided additional time to consider the draft preliminary overture
and the best approach to take for a new governance structure for
CUS and the CUS institutions. The Board of Directors requested
the committee continue to consider the proposed draft overture
and further input. During the summer of 2022, the committee
incorporated additional changes into the draft proposed overture to
take into consideration further input that had been received during
the previous several months.
The committee prepared a final proposed draft overture that
was submitted to the Board of Directors for its consideration and
possible approval at its Nov. 2022 meeting. Before the Board of
Directors meeting, the CUS institution presidents requested the
Board of Directors to consider further modifications to the draft
overture. Based on this request, the Board of Directors postponed
action on the final proposed draft overture. In Feb. 2023, the Board
of Directors received the CUS institutions presidents’ proposed
modifications and requested the of the 2019 Res. 7-03 drafting subcommittee and Board of Directors 2019 Res. 7-03 sub-committee
to continue to discuss further possible changes to the proposed
overture, in particular those being proposed by the CUS institution
presidents.
The most recent draft from the 2019 Res. 7-03 Committee is
attached, with the understanding that there are ongoing discussions
regarding further proposed changes before a final proposed overture is submitted for consideration by the 2023 Synod convention.
This draft overture includes an extensive preamble as well as a
separate rationale for each of the eight sections. The preamble and
rationale explain the intent and purpose of the proposed overture
and answer many questions raised.
The ongoing discussion includes further consideration of the
current proposal to change each CUS institution from an agency
of the Synod to an affiliated entity. The current proposal makes
the suggested change to recognize the reality of the financial circumstances facing the institutions, CUS, and the Synod. There has
been a decades-long trend of reduced funding from congregations
to the districts and, in turn, from the districts to the Synod. This impacts the funding of the Synod and accordingly the funding of CUS
and the CUS institutions. There also have been frequent tensions
between CUS and some CUS institution presidents and boards of
regents since the inception of CUS. The current proposal reflects
efforts to minimize such tensions.
Ongoing discussions will address questions and concerns raised
regarding the current proposed change from “agency” to “affiliated.” This discussion also will continue to take into consideration
the financial and governance realities facing CUS, CUS institutions, and other Synod entities impacted. In addition, other questions and issues raised concerning the current draft proposal and
the need to fulfill the objectives of 2019 Res. 7-03 will be consid-
139
ered. An updated draft then will be submitted to the Synod Board
of Directors for its consideration. The Synod Board of Directors
will then make the decision regarding a proposed new governance
structure for consideration by the 2023 convention.
Christian A. Preus, Chairman
Appendix: Current Committee Draft
To Revise Bylaws to Revisit and Renew
the Relationship of Colleges and Universities
with the Synod
Preamble
The following proposed convention action, having to do with
the Concordia University System, would fundamentally renovate
the relationship of the Synod with the Concordia colleges and
universities. It aims to respond effectively—with realism, faithfulness, and hopefulness—to decades of higher education change.
Long gone are the days:
• when the Synod’s higher education institutions were supported largely by the local faithful, often in donations of kind
(volunteer help, farm and garden produce); or
• when Synod-related colleges existed largely or even solely
for Lutheran teacher and preseminary education, with a large
proportion of Synod’s seminary students blessed by six or
more years of formal, comprehensive preseminary pastoral
formation.
Gone also are the more recent days:
• when the Synod’s congregations regularly supplied students
(whether in church work or general liberal arts), faculty, or,
through the Synod, financial subsidy sufficient to dominate
the operating scale of Concordia colleges and universities.
Today—far along in a gradual but profound transformation
that began in the 1970s—church work (4 percent) and member-congregation students (11 percent) are a small minority and tuition and fees (especially from profitable, largely
graduate, almost exclusively nonchurch-work programs),
grants, and gifts from the faithful, from alumni, and from
surrounding communities have replaced a Synod subsidy as
principal financial means. Only approximately 5–6 percent
of graduates of Synod parochial and high schools attend a
Concordia University;
• when the Synod’s Concordias served only traditional, residential undergraduate students studying in a limited number
of academic programs on campuses oriented principally or
exclusively toward church work or final pastoral formation
at seminary. Today, the colleges and universities offer, to a
confessionally diverse student population, dozens of online
and on-ground undergraduate and master’s, doctoral, and
professional degrees and programs in a wide variety of disciplines, including health care, education, criminal justice,
etc.;
• when individual Concordias could get by with simply a sufficient “captive audience” of Synod students. Today they
operate at present scale by offering attractive campuses and
programs that compete successfully for the investment of
considerable time and money of a sufficient number of prospective students from outside sources;
2023 Convention Workbook