Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2023 · 68th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 237
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2023, Page 237
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
front matter 19
front matter 20
front matter 21
front matter 22
front matter 23
front matter 24
front matter 25
front matter 26
front matter 27
front matter 28
front matter 29
front matter 30
front matter 31
front matter 32
front matter 33
front matter 34
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Page 395
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Page 399
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Page 410
Page 411
Page 412
Page 413
Page 414
Page 415
Page 416
Page 417
Page 418
Page 419
Page 420
Page 421
Page 422
Page 423
Page 424
Page 425
Page 426
Page 427
Page 428
Page 429
Page 430
Page 431
Page 432
Page 433
Page 434
Page 435
Page 436
Page 437
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
THEOLOGICAL DOCUMENTS—COMMISSION ON THEOLOGY AND CHURCH 2
RELATIONS
Theological Considerations and Procedural Guidelines
Regarding
The Recognition of Altar and Pulpit Fellowship
Between
The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod and Another Church Body 1
Article III of the Constitution of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod (LCMS) lists as the first
objective of the Synod that
•
The Synod, under Scripture and the Lutheran Confessions, shall—Conserve and promote
the unity of the true faith (Eph. 4:3-6; 1 Cor. 1:10), work through its official structure
toward fellowship with other Christian church bodies, and provide a united defense
against schism, sectarianism (Rom. 16:17), and heresy.
This document sets forth theological considerations and procedural guidelines for The Lutheran
Church—Missouri Synod as it responds to a request by another church body for altar and pulpit
fellowship with the LCMS.
I. Delineation of Responsibilities
1. The President of the Synod
The president of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod is “the chief ecumenical officer
of the Synod.” The LCMS Bylaws state the following in this regard:
a) He shall represent the Synod, in consultation with the appropriate board or
commission, in official contacts with all partner churches by aiding, counseling, and
advising them and strengthening the relations with and among them.
b) He shall develop protocol documents between the Synod and partner church bodies
according to which the Synod and its agencies will work together with its partner
churches in foreign mission fields, which documents are also to be respected by
agencies, auxiliaries, and recognized service organizations. 2
An earlier “Policy for The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod Declaring Altar and Pulpit Fellowship with Another
Church Body” was adopted by the CTCR in April 2003 in response to a request from the President of the Synod,
then revised in 2014 to reflect 2010 convention action (e.g., 2010 Res. 3-04A) and 2010 and 2013 changes to the
Synod Bylaws. This revised document was approved by the CTCR on September 17, 2020.
2
A protocol document is an official, written agreement between the LCMS and a partner church that is executed by
the respective church leaders and that codifies the recognition of altar and pulpit fellowship while establishing
certain protocols for inter-church relations upon which the two church bodies have mutually agreed. Protocol
agreements are intended and expected to be permanent (unless subsequent revisions are mutually agreed upon by
both church bodies).
1
237
c) He or his representative shall represent the Synod in official contacts with other
church bodies. (Bylaw 3.3.1.1.2 a–c)
2. The Commission on Theology and Church Relations
The Commission on Theology and Church Relations (CTCR) is “to assist the President of
the Synod in matters of church relationships” (Bylaw 3.9.5). The CTCR is to “assist the
President at his request in discharging his constitutional responsibilities for maintaining
doctrinal integrity as he relates to other church bodies” (Bylaw 3.9.5.2.2).
The Bylaw further explicates the CTCR’s responsibilities as follows:
a) It shall address itself to and evaluate existing fellowship relations for the purpose of
mutual admonition and encouragement.
b) When a church body applies for formal recognition of altar and pulpit fellowship with
the Synod, such recognition shall be proposed at a convention of the Synod only after
the approval of the commission.
c) When a small, formative, emerging confessional Lutheran church body (identified as
such by the President of the Synod as chief ecumenical officer) requests recognition
of altar and pulpit fellowship with the Synod after consultation with the Praesidium
and approval by the commission, such recognition may be declared by the President
of the Synod subject to the endorsement of the subsequent Synod convention.
d) When a mission of the Synod applies for formal recognition as a self-governing
partner church, such recognition shall be proposed at convention of the Synod by the
Board for International Mission with the approval of the commission.
e) When an entity (e.g., a district, mission, group of congregations, etc.) of a selfgoverning partner church is established as an independent church body in altar and
pulpit fellowship with that partner church body, and subsequently requests
recognition of altar and pulpit fellowship with Synod, such recognition may be
declared by the President of Synod, after consultation with the Praesidium and
approval by the commission, subject to the endorsement of the subsequent Synod
convention. (Bylaw 3.9.5.2.2 a–e)
3. The Synod in Convention
The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod in convention, acting on the basis of a
recommendation of the CTCR, declares recognition of altar and pulpit fellowship with
another church body.
In cases where the president of Synod has declared recognition of altar and pulpit
fellowship with “a small, formative, emerging confessional Lutheran church body” or
with “an entity” (e.g., a district, mission, group of congregations, etc.) “of a selfgoverning partner church” that has been “established as an independent church body in
altar and pulpit fellowship with that partner church body” the subsequent Synod
convention is asked to endorse the declaration. (Bylaw 3.9.5.2.2 c and 3.9.5.2.2 e)
4. Members of the Synod
3
Members and officers of the Synod will respect this orderly procedure and shall not move
ahead of the Synod as a whole by engaging in altar and pulpit fellowship before such has
been officially recognized. Members and officers should consult with the president or his
representative and the Office of International Mission (where necessary) before making
contacts with or making overseas trips to church bodies with whom we are not yet in
fellowship (see Bylaw 3.8.3).
So that these provisions may be carried out with consistency and in faithfulness to the
Scriptures and the Lutheran Confessions, a relationship of altar and pulpit fellowship
between another autonomous church body and the Synod shall be officially recognized in the
following manner.
II. Basic Considerations
In considering whether the Synod should declare recognition of altar and pulpit fellowship
with another church body, the president of the Synod and the CTCR shall take into
consideration the following criteria.
1. Altar and pulpit fellowship is a relationship that has agreement “in doctrine and in all its
articles” as its basis (FC SD X 31).
“While the church’s internal unity is perfect and known only to God (Eph. 1:4), the limits
of external fellowship are determined by whether the Gospel is preached purely and the
sacraments are administered according to Christ’s institution. The Gospel and the
sacraments are in themselves always pure. In this way they create and preserve the
church in her hidden unity throughout the world. Yet, when church bodies make public
confession of the Gospel and the sacraments, tragically some obscure or explicitly
contradict the teaching of the Gospel and the proper administration of the Sacraments.
For this reason the limits or boundaries of the external fellowship are creeds and
confessions. Churches in altar and pulpit fellowship share the same confession, including
the rejection of errors that contradict this confession. Where churches cannot agree on a
common confession, the basis for church fellowship does not exist” (Lutheran
Understanding of Church Fellowship, p. 5).
2. Altar and pulpit fellowship is a relationship which signifies agreement not only in a
church body’s formal statements but also agreement in the implementation of the formal
confessions of a church body in its actual life and practice.
“Confessional ecumenism recognizes the importance of practice as the application of
doctrine to life. Proper formulations of the meaning of the Gospel on the basis of the
Scriptures, necessary as such formulations are, are no substitute for actually preaching,
teaching, and living the Gospel and using the sacraments. Practice is a fair indication of
fidelity to the Gospel. For example, it does little good to point to an excellent formulation
of the lodge problem in a synodical constitution if in fact that policy is not being followed
in the parishes. It means little to point to a fine statement on the inerrancy of Holy
Scripture in the Brief Statement or the United Testimony of Faith and Life if, in fact, that
position is no longer consistently followed. We need to remember that the Augsburg
Confession (VII) is talking about a Gospel that is actually taught and proclaimed and
4
about sacraments that are actually administered. Why? Because it is through the
‘practice’ of the Gospel, if you will, that the Holy Spirit creates and sustains His church.
To be sure, not all items in the area of practice are clearly defined in the Word of God,
and this needs to be recognized. But where they are, or where they clearly relate to the
Gospel, there can be no ecumenical retreat to the safety of written formulations at the
expense of what is actually happening in the church’s parishes as well as its seminaries,
colleges, publishing houses, boards and commissions. Herein lies one of the chief reasons
why The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod holds doctrinal discussions with other
Lutheran groups prior to the establishment of altar and pulpit fellowship” (Ralph
Bohlmann, “Celebration of Concord” in Theologian’s Convocation Formula for
Concord, 1977, pp. 69–70).
3. Altar and pulpit fellowship is an officially-recognized relationship between two selfgoverning church bodies or ecclesiastical entities.
In addition to agreement in confession, factors that may need to be taken into account in
making a recommendation for altar and pulpit fellowship with another church body
include its history, self-understanding, and confessional and organizational stability and
maturity. That is, the process for declaring church fellowship must be realistic with
regard to external circumstances of the two churches. In the case of established church
bodies with significant traditions of theology and practice, a more formal process may be
appropriate. In the case of a small, formative, emerging confessional church body without
extensive structures or organizations a simpler process may be appropriate.
4. Altar and pulpit fellowship is a relationship that affects all those church bodies with
which each of the two newly related church bodies holds church fellowship.
Early on in the process of contemplating the possibility of altar and pulpit fellowship, the
churches with which the Synod is already in church fellowship are to be informed of this
prospect and their input requested. The president of the Synod and the CTCR will
consider the responses of the Synod’s partner churches in reaching its recommendation
regarding the possibility of church fellowship with this church body.
5. Existing LCMS mission work may be a factor in the contemplation of possible altar and
pulpit fellowship with a church body.
6. When the LCMS has current missionary personnel or when it has had missionaries in the
past serving in the country or region where the church body requesting fellowship is
located, the Office of International Mission should be informed of the request and
consulted regarding it.
III. Procedures
A. In the case of considering formal recognition of altar and pulpit fellowship with an
established church body (in distinction from “a small, formative, emerging” church —
see III.B., below), the following procedures are in order:
2023 Convention Workbook