Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2023 · 68th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 68

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2023, Page 68

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 front matter 19 front matter 20 front matter 21 front matter 22 front matter 23 front matter 24 front matter 25 front matter 26 front matter 27 front matter 28 front matter 29 front matter 30 front matter 31 front matter 32 front matter 33 front matter 34 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Page 395 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Page 399 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Page 410 Page 411 Page 412 Page 413 Page 414 Page 415 Page 416 Page 417 Page 418 Page 419 Page 420 Page 421 Page 422 Page 423 Page 424 Page 425 Page 426 Page 427 Page 428 Page 429 Page 430 Page 431 Page 432 Page 433 Page 434 Page 435 Page 436 Page 437

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

68

OFFICER, BOARD, AND COMMISSION REPORTS
tional opportunities outside its local context, that seek it out
for Kingdom work.

As of the writing of this report, the Board of Regents has not yet
reversed its action.
As Synod Bylaw 1.10.1.4 reminds, “Christian conflict resolution seeks to resolve issues in a manner pleasing to God. Those
in conflict are urged to proceed prayerfully in good faith and trust.
Disputes are more likely to be resolved harmoniously if those involved in the conflict recognize one another as redeemed children
of God,” that is, when we truly love one another as described in
1 John 4:9, 11 (KJV), “In this was manifested the love of God
toward us, because that God sent His only begotten Son into the
world, so that we might live through Him. … Beloved, if God so
loved us, we ought also to love one another.”

•

A failure to emphasize compliance with the doctrine and
practice of the LCMS is a departure from what we as a
church body believe, teach, confess, and do. This increases
the likelihood of mere shallow compliance with Article II of
the Synod’s Constitution. If there is any phrase that captures
the depth and entirety of the Synod’s confessional position,
its heart and soul, it is the phrase “the Synod’s doctrine and
practice,” which includes the entire Synod Handbook and
also its official doctrinal resolutions and statements, a phrase
referred to no less than 16 times throughout the Handbook
(Articles of Incorporation II c; Const. Art. XI B 2–3; Bylaws
2.14.5 [d]; 2.14.7.8 [f]; 2.15.7.8 [f]; 2.16.7.6 [f]; 2.17.5 [d];
3.6.6.4 [e]; 3.6.6.5 [e]; 3.10.6.4 [e]; 3.6.6.5 [e]; 3.10.6.4 [i]
[9]; 4.1.5; 4.8.1 [b]; 6.2.1; 6.2.2.2 [c][1]; and 6.1.3 [f]).

•

The Board of Regents is to act as an “agent of the Synod”
and as “custodian of the Synod’s property” (Bylaws 1.2.1
[a] and [r]; 3.10.6.4 [i]; 3.10.6.4 [i][1]; and 3.10.6.5). And
as with all officers and agencies of the Synod, they “shall be
accountable to the Synod for all their actions, and any concerns regarding the decisions of such officers and agencies
may be brought to the attention of the Synod in convention
for appropriate action” (Bylaw 1.4.1).

•

Finally, the Board of Regents acted less than two months
after finally providing CUS with CTX’s completed proposal,
thereby bypassing Bylaw 3.6.6.4 (i), and on Nov. 8, 2022,
voted to separate from the Synod through the purported
adoption of revisions to its governance documents.

Bylaws 1.10.1.5 and 1.10.1.6 get to the very heart of the matter,
providing wise counsel for Christians in dispute:
Christians involved in conflict must always stand ready to
ask for or extend forgiveness in accordance with Scripture.
As the church endeavors to help bring about peace, truth, justice, and reconciliation, it always seeks to do so with a proper
distinction between Law and Gospel, that is, in the context
of God’s judgment and mercy. We are ever to be mindful that
it is God who judges the hearts of sinful men and grants His
gracious word of forgiveness to us all.
When there is repentance and reconciliation, the body of
Christ rejoices in its oneness with Christ and with one another.
It is this love for each other, founded upon the love of God that
is ours in Christ, that brought CUS to Austin to meet with the CTX
regents and leadership. CUS’s stated goal for the meeting was to
seek repentance and, thereby, reconciliation.
Here are some of the reasons for this call to repentance.
•

CTX’s governance document changes are not an “alignment
with the Synod.” CTX has been aligned with our Synod for
nearly 100 years. Instead, the governance document revisions move CTX toward becoming separate from and unaligned with the Synod. Along with this, the governance
documents provide subscriptions to Holy Scripture and the
Lutheran Confessions that are not whole in CUS’s view,
much like that of so many other so-called Lutheran church
bodies and educational institutions whose good intentions
have ultimately lacked the depth of conviction to be able to
withstand over time the pressures and even persecutions of
an increasingly godless society.

•

An attempt to distance the university from our Synod occurs
throughout certain documents shared with the CUS Board.
In particular, they omit all references to the doctrine and
practice of our Synod, creating distance from the Synod. The
university retains sole power for it to do all that is necessary
or desirable to carry out its goals and purposes, this contrary
to one of an LCMS university’s primary duties clearly stated
in Synod Bylaw 3.10.6.1, that is, “the defining and fulfilling
of the mission of the institution within the broad assignment
of the Synod.”

•

The documentation provided to the CUS Board further appears to direct the university’s focus away from the Synod
toward: (a) LCMS entities such as congregations, schools,
and organizations; (b) the Texas District; (c) the greater
Austin Christian community (as a partner in the work of the
church’s mission across the region); and (d) national/interna-

2023 Convention Workbook

For the last three Synod conventions (2013, 2016, 2019), the
Synod has received overtures and resolutions that have requested
that CUS schools draw closer to the Synod in doctrine and practice.
All of these resolutions were adopted by more than 90 percent of
the delegates at those conventions. While most CUS schools have
already moved in that direction, the purported changes in CTX’s
governance documents move CTX in precisely the opposite direction through the removal of LCMS theological oversight. While
offering to “align” with the Texas District, CTX’s proposed governance documents describe an independent, self-perpetuating board
with an expanded presidential authority, leaving the LCMS with
little if any means to assure theological integrity.
CTX was founded in 1926 by members of the Lutheran, Texas, Wendish, immigrant community. One of their number, John
Killian, was also the founder of the first Texas Lutheran Church
that was a member of the LCMS. For 96 years, Missouri Synod
Lutherans have sent their children and their gifts to constitute and
result in the present campus and university operations. Those generations of Lutherans assumed that their support would further the
higher educational mission of the LCMS and nurture students in
the doctrine and practice of the Church. The church is indebted to
these saints and has a sacred obligation to preserve and enhance
their investment.
Beyond this ecclesial solidarity with previous generations of
confessing Lutherans, CTX occupies a strategic location for the
present and future witness of the LCMS. The city of Austin is at
the epicenter of economic and demographic growth in the United
States. CTX is the only campus that the LCMS has in the southern
portion of the United States and provides an irreplaceable platform
for proclaiming the Gospel of Jesus Christ and sharing the full