Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2023 · 68th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 68
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2023, Page 68
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
front matter 19
front matter 20
front matter 21
front matter 22
front matter 23
front matter 24
front matter 25
front matter 26
front matter 27
front matter 28
front matter 29
front matter 30
front matter 31
front matter 32
front matter 33
front matter 34
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Page 395
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Page 399
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Page 410
Page 411
Page 412
Page 413
Page 414
Page 415
Page 416
Page 417
Page 418
Page 419
Page 420
Page 421
Page 422
Page 423
Page 424
Page 425
Page 426
Page 427
Page 428
Page 429
Page 430
Page 431
Page 432
Page 433
Page 434
Page 435
Page 436
Page 437
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
68
OFFICER, BOARD, AND COMMISSION REPORTS
tional opportunities outside its local context, that seek it out
for Kingdom work.
As of the writing of this report, the Board of Regents has not yet
reversed its action.
As Synod Bylaw 1.10.1.4 reminds, “Christian conflict resolution seeks to resolve issues in a manner pleasing to God. Those
in conflict are urged to proceed prayerfully in good faith and trust.
Disputes are more likely to be resolved harmoniously if those involved in the conflict recognize one another as redeemed children
of God,” that is, when we truly love one another as described in
1 John 4:9, 11 (KJV), “In this was manifested the love of God
toward us, because that God sent His only begotten Son into the
world, so that we might live through Him. … Beloved, if God so
loved us, we ought also to love one another.”
•
A failure to emphasize compliance with the doctrine and
practice of the LCMS is a departure from what we as a
church body believe, teach, confess, and do. This increases
the likelihood of mere shallow compliance with Article II of
the Synod’s Constitution. If there is any phrase that captures
the depth and entirety of the Synod’s confessional position,
its heart and soul, it is the phrase “the Synod’s doctrine and
practice,” which includes the entire Synod Handbook and
also its official doctrinal resolutions and statements, a phrase
referred to no less than 16 times throughout the Handbook
(Articles of Incorporation II c; Const. Art. XI B 2–3; Bylaws
2.14.5 [d]; 2.14.7.8 [f]; 2.15.7.8 [f]; 2.16.7.6 [f]; 2.17.5 [d];
3.6.6.4 [e]; 3.6.6.5 [e]; 3.10.6.4 [e]; 3.6.6.5 [e]; 3.10.6.4 [i]
[9]; 4.1.5; 4.8.1 [b]; 6.2.1; 6.2.2.2 [c][1]; and 6.1.3 [f]).
•
The Board of Regents is to act as an “agent of the Synod”
and as “custodian of the Synod’s property” (Bylaws 1.2.1
[a] and [r]; 3.10.6.4 [i]; 3.10.6.4 [i][1]; and 3.10.6.5). And
as with all officers and agencies of the Synod, they “shall be
accountable to the Synod for all their actions, and any concerns regarding the decisions of such officers and agencies
may be brought to the attention of the Synod in convention
for appropriate action” (Bylaw 1.4.1).
•
Finally, the Board of Regents acted less than two months
after finally providing CUS with CTX’s completed proposal,
thereby bypassing Bylaw 3.6.6.4 (i), and on Nov. 8, 2022,
voted to separate from the Synod through the purported
adoption of revisions to its governance documents.
Bylaws 1.10.1.5 and 1.10.1.6 get to the very heart of the matter,
providing wise counsel for Christians in dispute:
Christians involved in conflict must always stand ready to
ask for or extend forgiveness in accordance with Scripture.
As the church endeavors to help bring about peace, truth, justice, and reconciliation, it always seeks to do so with a proper
distinction between Law and Gospel, that is, in the context
of God’s judgment and mercy. We are ever to be mindful that
it is God who judges the hearts of sinful men and grants His
gracious word of forgiveness to us all.
When there is repentance and reconciliation, the body of
Christ rejoices in its oneness with Christ and with one another.
It is this love for each other, founded upon the love of God that
is ours in Christ, that brought CUS to Austin to meet with the CTX
regents and leadership. CUS’s stated goal for the meeting was to
seek repentance and, thereby, reconciliation.
Here are some of the reasons for this call to repentance.
•
CTX’s governance document changes are not an “alignment
with the Synod.” CTX has been aligned with our Synod for
nearly 100 years. Instead, the governance document revisions move CTX toward becoming separate from and unaligned with the Synod. Along with this, the governance
documents provide subscriptions to Holy Scripture and the
Lutheran Confessions that are not whole in CUS’s view,
much like that of so many other so-called Lutheran church
bodies and educational institutions whose good intentions
have ultimately lacked the depth of conviction to be able to
withstand over time the pressures and even persecutions of
an increasingly godless society.
•
An attempt to distance the university from our Synod occurs
throughout certain documents shared with the CUS Board.
In particular, they omit all references to the doctrine and
practice of our Synod, creating distance from the Synod. The
university retains sole power for it to do all that is necessary
or desirable to carry out its goals and purposes, this contrary
to one of an LCMS university’s primary duties clearly stated
in Synod Bylaw 3.10.6.1, that is, “the defining and fulfilling
of the mission of the institution within the broad assignment
of the Synod.”
•
The documentation provided to the CUS Board further appears to direct the university’s focus away from the Synod
toward: (a) LCMS entities such as congregations, schools,
and organizations; (b) the Texas District; (c) the greater
Austin Christian community (as a partner in the work of the
church’s mission across the region); and (d) national/interna-
2023 Convention Workbook
For the last three Synod conventions (2013, 2016, 2019), the
Synod has received overtures and resolutions that have requested
that CUS schools draw closer to the Synod in doctrine and practice.
All of these resolutions were adopted by more than 90 percent of
the delegates at those conventions. While most CUS schools have
already moved in that direction, the purported changes in CTX’s
governance documents move CTX in precisely the opposite direction through the removal of LCMS theological oversight. While
offering to “align” with the Texas District, CTX’s proposed governance documents describe an independent, self-perpetuating board
with an expanded presidential authority, leaving the LCMS with
little if any means to assure theological integrity.
CTX was founded in 1926 by members of the Lutheran, Texas, Wendish, immigrant community. One of their number, John
Killian, was also the founder of the first Texas Lutheran Church
that was a member of the LCMS. For 96 years, Missouri Synod
Lutherans have sent their children and their gifts to constitute and
result in the present campus and university operations. Those generations of Lutherans assumed that their support would further the
higher educational mission of the LCMS and nurture students in
the doctrine and practice of the Church. The church is indebted to
these saints and has a sacred obligation to preserve and enhance
their investment.
Beyond this ecclesial solidarity with previous generations of
confessing Lutherans, CTX occupies a strategic location for the
present and future witness of the LCMS. The city of Austin is at
the epicenter of economic and demographic growth in the United
States. CTX is the only campus that the LCMS has in the southern
portion of the United States and provides an irreplaceable platform
for proclaiming the Gospel of Jesus Christ and sharing the full