Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2023 · 68th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 57

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2023, Page 57

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 front matter 19 front matter 20 front matter 21 front matter 22 front matter 23 front matter 24 front matter 25 front matter 26 front matter 27 front matter 28 front matter 29 front matter 30 front matter 31 front matter 32 front matter 33 front matter 34 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Page 395 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Page 399 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Page 410 Page 411 Page 412 Page 413 Page 414 Page 415 Page 416 Page 417 Page 418 Page 419 Page 420 Page 421 Page 422 Page 423 Page 424 Page 425 Page 426 Page 427 Page 428 Page 429 Page 430 Page 431 Page 432 Page 433 Page 434 Page 435 Page 436 Page 437

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

OFFICER, BOARD, AND COMMISSION REPORTS
The commission also included an executive summary of the 10
points. This opinion reaffirmed the earlier positions of Communion
and Covid-19 while urging that LCMS churches refrain from online
Communion. This opinion is included in the Workbook appendix.

3. Shut-In Communion
In the 2013–2016 triennium, the CTCR received a request for
an opinion from the president of the South Wisconsin District on
questions related to the administration of the Lord’s Supper to
shut-ins by a commissioned minister. After due deliberation, at its
December 2022 meeting, the commission unanimously approved a
response and subsequently communicated it to the South Wisconsin
District. This opinion is included in the Workbook appendix.

4. Guidelines for Laymen Conducting Public Worship
Services
In November 2022, the CTCR received a request from the President of Synod to provide a rationale and recommend guidelines for
laymen who must publicly read sermons or conduct worship services in the absence of a pastor, whether in an emergency situation
or for an extended period of time. The commission assigned staff to
produce a response, which it intends to complete in advance of the
Synod convention.

F. Expressions of Dissent
Bylaw section 1.8 provides a process for orderly “[d]issent from
the doctrinal position of the Synod as expressed in its resolutions
and doctrinal statements.” That process involves, first, discussion
“within the fellowship of peers” and thereafter the dissent is to
be “brought to the attention of the Commission on Theology and
Church Relations” (Bylaw 1.8.2).
In the 2019–2023 extended triennium, the CTCR received correspondence regarding a potential dissent to the status of C.F.W.
Walther’s theses on church and ministry. Out of concern for unity
and in order to provide further fraternal discussion, the commission and its staff engaged in prolonged correspondence with the
prospective dissenter. In 2022, faculty members from both seminaries met independently with the individual in question to discuss
his concerns. Both the commission, in several written responses,
and the respective faculty representatives, advised the individual
that his concerns were unclear and his position not at odds with
Walther’s theses. Ultimately, the individual chose to reject the commission’s opinion on the legitimacy of his dissent and indicated his
intention to proceed with an overture to the convention.

II. Church Relations
The CTCR has the responsibility to “assist the President of the
Synod at his request in discharging his constitutional responsibilities for maintaining doctrinal integrity as he relates to other church
bodies” (Bylaw 3.9.5.2.2). This includes circumstances in which a
church body requests LCMS recognition of fellowship. The commission’s approval is required for each fellowship request. In light
of the many changes occurring in world Lutheranism, the LCMS
has increasing numbers of fellowship requests and the CTCR seeks
to address them both efficiently and faithfully. What follows includes four parts: (A) matters of policy and procedure undertaken
to clarify the process leading to recognition of church fellowship;
(B) formal requests for fellowship that have been recognized by the
commission or are anticipated to be recognized prior to the convention; (C) relationships with church bodies that may eventuate
in a formal act of dissolution by the convention; and (D) official

57

theological conversations with various church bodies that the commission does not believe will eventuate in formal recognition of
church fellowship.

A.

Policies and Procedural Matters

1. Theological Considerations and Procedural Guidelines regarding Altar and Pulpit Fellowship
At the request of the Synod president in 2003, the CTCR adopted a formal policy for declaring altar and pulpit fellowship, which
it subsequently revised in 2014 to reflect convention actions and
bylaw changes in the intervening years. Since the 2019 convention
amended Bylaw 3.9.5.2.2 concerning the procedure for recognizing altar and pulpit fellowship, the commission again reviewed its
policy in order to bring it into conformity with the Synod Bylaws.
In addition to a number of changes made for the sake of clarity, the
commission inserted a new section (III.E) detailing a “procedure
for contemplating and/or recommending the termination of recognition of altar and pulpit fellowship with another church body.” A
full text of the policy is included in the Workbook appendix.

2. Proposed Bylaw Revisions (Bylaw 3.9.5.2.2)
Following consultation with the Office of the President’s director of church relations and the Secretary of Synod, the commission considered revisions to Bylaw 3.9.5.2.2, which pertains to the
CTCR’s function in the recognition of church fellowship. At its
April 2022 meeting, the commission approved the revisions and
forwarded them to the Secretary of Synod for consultation with
the Commission on Handbook and the Commission on Constitutional Matters. It proposed the elimination of 3.9.5.2.2 (e), which
had been added at the 2019 convention, while also clarifying and
condensing 3.9.5.2.2 (b–d).

B. Requests for Church Fellowship Approved by
the CTCR
In addition to the requests below approved by the CTCR, many
existing and new requests for fellowship remain under consideration. In collaboration with the Church Relations staff of the President’s Office and the Office of International Mission, the CTCR
continues to monitor developments among church bodies requesting fellowship, maintain conversation and correspondence with
them, and discuss those requests at meetings of the commission.
Due to the sheer volume of such requests, it is inadvisable to include all such relationships in this report until such a time as a request for fellowship is approved by the commission.

1. Evangelical Lutheran Mission Diocese in Finland
(ELMDF)
Representatives of the LCMS and ELMDF began formal correspondence and discussions concerning the possibility of fellowship
between our two church bodies in 2017. In 2018, the ELMDF was
accepted into the International Lutheran Council as a full member.
At the same time, the ELMDF formally requested a recognition of
fellowship with the LCMS. The ELMDF is in fellowship with several LCMS partner church bodies, including the Lutheran Church‒
Canada. After further CTCR consideration, the ELMDF, represented by then-bishop Risto Soramies, met with the commission
in February 2020. At that meeting, the CTCR voted unanimously
to recommend the formal recognition of altar and pulpit fellowship with the ELMDF pursuant to Bylaw 3.9.5.2.2 (c), forwarding
its recommendation to the Office of the President for declaration
and subsequent endorsement by the Synod in convention. President
2023 Convention Workbook