Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2016 · 66th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 223

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 2016, Page 223

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

aged to request from their district president names of ordained
ministers of religion on candidate status who are prepared and
available for a call; and be it further

To Expedite the Dispute Resolution
and Suspension/Expulsion Processes

Resolved, That congregations be encouraged to consider calling
pastors on candidate status for part-time service; and be it finally

RESOLUTION 12-04A

Resolved, That congregations and schools that have requested
but have not received commissioned ministers of religion through
the regular placement process following certification be encouraged
to request from their district president names of commissioned
ministers of religion on candidate status who are prepared and
available for a call.
Action: Adopted (7)
(During discussion, the chair asked for any objection to voting
on the resolution without further discussion. The chair hearing no
objection, the convention adopted Res. 12-02A as presented [Yes:
1,033; No: 14].)

To Amend the Bylaws on Candidate Status
RESOLUTION 12-03
Report R60 (CW, pp. 231–233); Overtures 12-07–08, 12-10, 1243 (CW, pp. 418, 436)
Whereas, Church vocations exist for active service to the Lord’s
Church; and
Whereas, Candidate status and non-candidate status have been
granted to rostered workers of the Synod with the hope and expectation that they eventually return to active status (Bylaw 2.11.1); and
Whereas, Members of the Synod have asked for clarity regarding candidate and non-candidate status; and
Whereas, Candidates and non-candidates in good standing
are eligible to receive a call (CCM Opinion 09-2546); therefore be it
Resolved, That all references to non-candidate status be removed
from the Bylaws (Bylaws 2.11.2.3 et al.); and be it further
Resolved, That with the adoption of this resolution, all current
candidates and non-candidates be granted candidate status, effective immediately; and be it further
Resolved, That candidate status will be for a period of ten years,
and may be renewed for a five-year period upon the recommendation of the applicant’s district president and the approval of
three-fourths (75%) of the Council of Presidents; and be it finally

Report R65 (CW, pp. 297–298); Overture 12-42 (CW, pp.
432–435)
Rationale
Bylaw 1.10.1 speaks of disputes, disagreements, or offenses as a
“grave concern for the whole church” that “should be resolved
promptly.” An oft-voiced concern regarding the current dispute
resolution and suspension/expulsion processes is that they take
overly long to complete.
In addition, current time frames vary between the bylaws governing dispute resolution and those governing suspension/expulsion
processes, often for identical steps in the processes. The following
changes to Bylaw sections 1.10 and 2.14 will conserve time and provide uniformity. The changes to Bylaw section 2.14 are also, upon
adoption by the 2016 convention, to be applied to the 2.15, 2.16, and
2.17 processes as shown in the addendum to this report.
Also proposed is an addition to Bylaws 1.10.4 and 2.14.2 to accommodate unforeseen circumstances that at times make strict
adherence to time frames impossible, also providing authority to
the administrator of the process to grant exceptions and to report
intentional non-compliance to the President of the Synod.
Finally, an additional source of potentially lengthy delay has been
the difficulty experienced by the Commission on Theology and
Church Relations in responding within the time frames established
by bylaws to requests for opinions regarding theological issues surfaced by the dispute resolution and expulsion processes. Included in
the proposed actions below is a bylaw solution that would authorize
the executive committee of the commission to render these opinions within the established time frames.
Therefore be it
Resolved, That the following changes be made to Bylaw sections
1.10 and 2.14 to expedite and provide uniformity throughout the
Synod dispute resolution and suspension/expulsion processes, it
being understood that changes to the Bylaw section 2.14 process
will be applied to the Bylaw sections 2.15, 2.16, and 2.17 processes
during preparation of the 2016 Handbook.

Resolved, That the Commission on Handbook make all necessary Bylaw changes consistent with this resolution.
Action: Adopted (7)
(The chair hearing no objection to voting immediately, Res.
12-03 was adopted as presented [Yes: 990; No: 35].)

“12. Ecclesiastical Supervision and Dispute Resolution”

U P O N T H I S R O C K • Resolutions

|

223