Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2016 · 66th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 223
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 2016, Page 223
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
aged to request from their district president names of ordained
ministers of religion on candidate status who are prepared and
available for a call; and be it further
To Expedite the Dispute Resolution
and Suspension/Expulsion Processes
Resolved, That congregations be encouraged to consider calling
pastors on candidate status for part-time service; and be it finally
RESOLUTION 12-04A
Resolved, That congregations and schools that have requested
but have not received commissioned ministers of religion through
the regular placement process following certification be encouraged
to request from their district president names of commissioned
ministers of religion on candidate status who are prepared and
available for a call.
Action: Adopted (7)
(During discussion, the chair asked for any objection to voting
on the resolution without further discussion. The chair hearing no
objection, the convention adopted Res. 12-02A as presented [Yes:
1,033; No: 14].)
To Amend the Bylaws on Candidate Status
RESOLUTION 12-03
Report R60 (CW, pp. 231–233); Overtures 12-07–08, 12-10, 1243 (CW, pp. 418, 436)
Whereas, Church vocations exist for active service to the Lord’s
Church; and
Whereas, Candidate status and non-candidate status have been
granted to rostered workers of the Synod with the hope and expectation that they eventually return to active status (Bylaw 2.11.1); and
Whereas, Members of the Synod have asked for clarity regarding candidate and non-candidate status; and
Whereas, Candidates and non-candidates in good standing
are eligible to receive a call (CCM Opinion 09-2546); therefore be it
Resolved, That all references to non-candidate status be removed
from the Bylaws (Bylaws 2.11.2.3 et al.); and be it further
Resolved, That with the adoption of this resolution, all current
candidates and non-candidates be granted candidate status, effective immediately; and be it further
Resolved, That candidate status will be for a period of ten years,
and may be renewed for a five-year period upon the recommendation of the applicant’s district president and the approval of
three-fourths (75%) of the Council of Presidents; and be it finally
Report R65 (CW, pp. 297–298); Overture 12-42 (CW, pp.
432–435)
Rationale
Bylaw 1.10.1 speaks of disputes, disagreements, or offenses as a
“grave concern for the whole church” that “should be resolved
promptly.” An oft-voiced concern regarding the current dispute
resolution and suspension/expulsion processes is that they take
overly long to complete.
In addition, current time frames vary between the bylaws governing dispute resolution and those governing suspension/expulsion
processes, often for identical steps in the processes. The following
changes to Bylaw sections 1.10 and 2.14 will conserve time and provide uniformity. The changes to Bylaw section 2.14 are also, upon
adoption by the 2016 convention, to be applied to the 2.15, 2.16, and
2.17 processes as shown in the addendum to this report.
Also proposed is an addition to Bylaws 1.10.4 and 2.14.2 to accommodate unforeseen circumstances that at times make strict
adherence to time frames impossible, also providing authority to
the administrator of the process to grant exceptions and to report
intentional non-compliance to the President of the Synod.
Finally, an additional source of potentially lengthy delay has been
the difficulty experienced by the Commission on Theology and
Church Relations in responding within the time frames established
by bylaws to requests for opinions regarding theological issues surfaced by the dispute resolution and expulsion processes. Included in
the proposed actions below is a bylaw solution that would authorize
the executive committee of the commission to render these opinions within the established time frames.
Therefore be it
Resolved, That the following changes be made to Bylaw sections
1.10 and 2.14 to expedite and provide uniformity throughout the
Synod dispute resolution and suspension/expulsion processes, it
being understood that changes to the Bylaw section 2.14 process
will be applied to the Bylaw sections 2.15, 2.16, and 2.17 processes
during preparation of the 2016 Handbook.
Resolved, That the Commission on Handbook make all necessary Bylaw changes consistent with this resolution.
Action: Adopted (7)
(The chair hearing no objection to voting immediately, Res.
12-03 was adopted as presented [Yes: 990; No: 35].)
“12. Ecclesiastical Supervision and Dispute Resolution”
U P O N T H I S R O C K • Resolutions
|
223