Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2016 · 66th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 160
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 2016, Page 160
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
Whereas, If passed, this legislation would require women 18
years of age on or after January 1, 2018, to register for selective service and a possible draft, as the primary rationale provided by the
U.S. Supreme Court in allowing women to be excluded from the
draft was their ineligibility to serve in a combat capacity (Rostker
v. Goldberg); and
Whereas, The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on March 8, 1971, that
“the exemption for those who oppose ‘participation in war in any
form’ applies to those who oppose participating in all war and not
to those who object to participation in a particular war only, even
if the latter objection is religious in character” (Gillette v. United
States [401 U.S. 437 (1971)]), to the effect that the United States does
not allow for selective conscientious objection (e.g., for a specific
war deemed unjust); and
Whereas, Christians are to be subject to governing authorities
(Rom. 13; 1 Peter 2; Fourth Commandment LC and SC; AC XVI)
while remaining obedient to God whenever human authority seeks
to require us to act contrary to our conscience-bound convictions
regarding God’s Word and will (Acts 5:29; Fourth Commandment
LC and SC; AC XVI); and
Whereas, Biblical objections to women being required to serve
in the military in general or to serve in combat positions in particular have been voiced by many Christians, including members of
The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod (LCMS), based on scriptural concerns such as the complementary yet ordered relationship
between man and woman (Gen. 1–2; 1 Cor. 11); women as God’s
vessel for bearing life (Gen. 3:20); the requirement given to husbands, not wives, to love and honor in a manner that emulates the
sacrifice of Christ for His Bride, the Church (Eph. 5; 1 Peter 3:7; see
also Luther’s work “Whether Soldiers, Too, Can Be Saved” [AE 46,
pp. 87–135]); and the Scripture’s teaching on marriage, family, and
vocation (Prov. 31:10–31; Titus 2:3–5; etc.); and
Whereas, That which a Christian woman may do voluntarily
in her Christian freedom (Gal. 5:1) must be distinguished from that
which a woman is forced to do; and
Whereas, Lutheran Christians have a high regard for God’s
gifts of human reason and natural law, and take very seriously
the many reason-based arguments that have been made (by both
Christians and non-Christians) against women serving in combat positions (e.g., the negative impact on the family; the necessary
stripping away of modesty to be trained and perform combat functions; physical strength comparisons between men and women in
general; other physical and biological differences between men and
women; mixed-gender troop performance under combat conditions; etc.); therefore be it
Resolved, That the LCMS in convention acknowledge the
Department of Defense Instruction 1300.06: Conscientious Objectors (DoDI 1300.06, May 31, 2007), where two classifications for a
conscientious objector are recognized (Class 1-0 and Class 1-A-0)
and stand resolutely with any woman who holds “a firm, fixed, and
sincere objection to participation in war in any form or the bearing of arms, by reason of religious training and/or belief” (DoDI
1300.06 paragraph 3.1); and be it further
160
|
U P O N T H I S R O C K • Resolutions
Resolved, That the Word of God and the LCMS in convention
supports individuals in the LCMS who conscientiously object (1)
to a woman’s service in the military in general or (2) to a woman
in the military being required to serve in a combat capacity; and
be it further
Resolved, That due to deep and widespread concern among
many members of the LCMS—rooted in biblical convictions, historic understandings of natural law, and reason-based common
sense—about the negative impact of the conscription of women
on individual consciences, marriages, families, and society as a
whole, the LCMS in convention strongly oppose any legal action
that forces the compulsory service of women in the military, also
called the conscription of women, by mandatory participation in
Selective Service registration, a draft, or by any other mechanism;
and be it further
Resolved, That we also defend the informed consciences of
women who have carefully considered their station in life and Holy
Scripture on this issue who wish to voluntarily serve in our nation’s
military; and be it further
Resolved, That the Commission on Theology and Church Relations (CTCR) continue their diligent and beneficial work as tasked
by the 2013 convention (Res. 2-12A) to study the issue of employing
women in combat and bring it to a swift conclusion for widespread
distribution and use in the church; and be it further
Resolved, That at its earliest convenience, the Council of Presidents become familiar with and discuss together this topic and the
information readily available (along with the forthcoming CTCR
document) to better assist pastors and congregations and those
LCMS individuals “whose position is firm, fixed, sincere and deeply
held” (DoDI 1300.06) who are bound to apply for conscientious
objector status; and be it finally
Resolved, That the LCMS in convention strongly support the
responsibility and necessity for men and women to live and act
according to the Word of God and their consciences in this matter
while respecting the consciences of others (Rom. 14:2-3, 13-23; 1
Cor. 10:29; 1 Tim. 1:5; Heb. 13:18).
Action: Adopted (6)
(Res. 5-11A was introduced by the committee after striking out
the third resolve paragraph. Debate was ended by voice and show
of hands, and the resolution was adopted as changed [Yes: 946;
No: 89].)
To Commend and Encourage
Use of Luther’s Catechisms
RESOLUTION 5-12
President’s Report Part 2 (TB, pp. 21–31)
Whereas, The importance of teaching the Christian faith and a
godly life—catechesis—has been understood since the earliest days
of the Christian church as an essential aspect of the church’s regular life and its missionary mandate (Matt. 2:20; John 13:13; Acts
“5. Theology and Church Relations”