Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2016 · 66th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 160

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 2016, Page 160

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

Whereas, If passed, this legislation would require women 18
years of age on or after January 1, 2018, to register for selective service and a possible draft, as the primary rationale provided by the
U.S. Supreme Court in allowing women to be excluded from the
draft was their ineligibility to serve in a combat capacity (Rostker
v. Goldberg); and
Whereas, The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on March 8, 1971, that
“the exemption for those who oppose ‘participation in war in any
form’ applies to those who oppose participating in all war and not
to those who object to participation in a particular war only, even
if the latter objection is religious in character” (Gillette v. United
States [401 U.S. 437 (1971)]), to the effect that the United States does
not allow for selective conscientious objection (e.g., for a specific
war deemed unjust); and
Whereas, Christians are to be subject to governing authorities
(Rom. 13; 1 Peter 2; Fourth Commandment LC and SC; AC XVI)
while remaining obedient to God whenever human authority seeks
to require us to act contrary to our conscience-bound convictions
regarding God’s Word and will (Acts 5:29; Fourth Commandment
LC and SC; AC XVI); and
Whereas, Biblical objections to women being required to serve
in the military in general or to serve in combat positions in particular have been voiced by many Christians, including members of
The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod (LCMS), based on scriptural concerns such as the complementary yet ordered relationship
between man and woman (Gen. 1–2; 1 Cor. 11); women as God’s
vessel for bearing life (Gen. 3:20); the requirement given to husbands, not wives, to love and honor in a manner that emulates the
sacrifice of Christ for His Bride, the Church (Eph. 5; 1 Peter 3:7; see
also Luther’s work “Whether Soldiers, Too, Can Be Saved” [AE 46,
pp. 87–135]); and the Scripture’s teaching on marriage, family, and
vocation (Prov. 31:10–31; Titus 2:3–5; etc.); and
Whereas, That which a Christian woman may do voluntarily
in her Christian freedom (Gal. 5:1) must be distinguished from that
which a woman is forced to do; and
Whereas, Lutheran Christians have a high regard for God’s
gifts of human reason and natural law, and take very seriously
the many reason-based arguments that have been made (by both
Christians and non-Christians) against women serving in combat positions (e.g., the negative impact on the family; the necessary
stripping away of modesty to be trained and perform combat functions; physical strength comparisons between men and women in
general; other physical and biological differences between men and
women; mixed-gender troop performance under combat conditions; etc.); therefore be it
Resolved, That the LCMS in convention acknowledge the
Department of Defense Instruction 1300.06: Conscientious Objectors (DoDI 1300.06, May 31, 2007), where two classifications for a
conscientious objector are recognized (Class 1-0 and Class 1-A-0)
and stand resolutely with any woman who holds “a firm, fixed, and
sincere objection to participation in war in any form or the bearing of arms, by reason of religious training and/or belief” (DoDI
1300.06 paragraph 3.1); and be it further

160

|

U P O N T H I S R O C K • Resolutions

Resolved, That the Word of God and the LCMS in convention
supports individuals in the LCMS who conscientiously object (1)
to a woman’s service in the military in general or (2) to a woman
in the military being required to serve in a combat capacity; and
be it further
Resolved, That due to deep and widespread concern among
many members of the LCMS—rooted in biblical convictions, historic understandings of natural law, and reason-based common
sense—about the negative impact of the conscription of women
on individual consciences, marriages, families, and society as a
whole, the LCMS in convention strongly oppose any legal action
that forces the compulsory service of women in the military, also
called the conscription of women, by mandatory participation in
Selective Service registration, a draft, or by any other mechanism;
and be it further
Resolved, That we also defend the informed consciences of
women who have carefully considered their station in life and Holy
Scripture on this issue who wish to voluntarily serve in our nation’s
military; and be it further
Resolved, That the Commission on Theology and Church Relations (CTCR) continue their diligent and beneficial work as tasked
by the 2013 convention (Res. 2-12A) to study the issue of employing
women in combat and bring it to a swift conclusion for widespread
distribution and use in the church; and be it further
Resolved, That at its earliest convenience, the Council of Presidents become familiar with and discuss together this topic and the
information readily available (along with the forthcoming CTCR
document) to better assist pastors and congregations and those
LCMS individuals “whose position is firm, fixed, sincere and deeply
held” (DoDI 1300.06) who are bound to apply for conscientious
objector status; and be it finally
Resolved, That the LCMS in convention strongly support the
responsibility and necessity for men and women to live and act
according to the Word of God and their consciences in this matter
while respecting the consciences of others (Rom. 14:2-3, 13-23; 1
Cor. 10:29; 1 Tim. 1:5; Heb. 13:18).
Action: Adopted (6)
(Res. 5-11A was introduced by the committee after striking out
the third resolve paragraph. Debate was ended by voice and show
of hands, and the resolution was adopted as changed [Yes: 946;
No: 89].)

To Commend and Encourage
Use of Luther’s Catechisms
RESOLUTION 5-12
President’s Report Part 2 (TB, pp. 21–31)
Whereas, The importance of teaching the Christian faith and a
godly life—catechesis—has been understood since the earliest days
of the Christian church as an essential aspect of the church’s regular life and its missionary mandate (Matt. 2:20; John 13:13; Acts
“5. Theology and Church Relations”