Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2016 · 66th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 123

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 2016, Page 123

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

Special Presentation
by D r . Ryan An derson, Senior Researc h Fe llo w at th e H erita g e Fo un datio n

a nd Aut hor of T r u t h O v e r r u l e d : T h e F u t u r e o f M a r r i a g e a n d R e l i g i o u s F r e e d o m
66th Regular Convention of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod • July 11, 2016
This is an edited version of the speech given July 11, 2016, at the 66th Regular Convention of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod.

Thank you. Thank you for having me address you at
this important convention.
I’ve been asked to say a few things about the Supreme
Court’s decision this time last year redefining marriage in all 50 states, and what it means for Americans and what it will mean for the free exercise of
religion and the freedom of the church.
I just want to preface this by saying I’m not a
theologian. I’m coming at this from the perspective
of a political philosophy Ph.D. who now works at the
intersection of political philosophy and public policy.
So I’m thinking about the institution of marriage as
a government-recognized institution, not as a sacrament or as a covenant as a religious institution.
But I want to suggest that what the court has done
will have consequences both for the public institution
of marriage and for the sacramental or covenantal
understanding of marriage.

was a liberal sociology professor at Harvard.
He then became the liberal democratic senator
from the state of New York.
Moynihan wasn’t a racist. He wrote his report
precisely because he cared about black people, and
he thought that one-quarter of all black children
being born to single mothers would have negative
consequences for those communities, for those
women and for those children.
Fast forward to today. In Moynihan’s time, it was 5
percent of the general population and 25 percent in
the African-American population. Today, 40 percent
of all Americans are born to single mothers. Fifty percent of Hispanic Americans are born to single mothers, and it’s 70 percent among African Americans.

I want to start, as any good conservative should
start, by turning the clock back 50 years. Thank
you for laughing. That’s intended to be a joke.
Half of my audiences don’t get it. Turning it back
50 years to the Moynihan Report. It was 50 years
ago that Daniel Patrick Moynihan issued his infamous report on the state of the black family in the
United States. Moynihan pointed out that births to
single mothers in the general population were at 5
percent. But within the African American community, they were at 25 percent. Moynihan was then
roundly criticized for being a racist, even though he

“Special Presentation”

UPON THIS ROCK

|

123