Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2013 · 65th Convention, St. Louis › Page 186
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 2013, Page 186
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
opinion received from either the CCM or the CTCR.
(b) Such request for a final hearing shall be submitted
to the Secretary of the Synod with copies provided
supplied to the district president(s) of the accuser and
the accused, the chairman of the Hearing Panel, the
accuser, and the President of the Synod, and shall be
accompanied by a written memorandum stating the
basis for the request.
(a) Within 30 days after receipt of an appeal from the
accused, an Appeal Panel shall be selected by the Secretary of the Synod. The Appeal Panel shall be made
up of three district presidents who shall be trained
for such service.
(1) One district president shall be selected by the
accused, one by the ecclesiastical supervisor of the
accused, and the third by the two Appeal Panel
members so selected.
(2) If the two Appeal Panel members cannot agree
on a third panel member, the Secretary of the
Synod shall select the third member by blind draw
from the remaining eligible district presidents.
(b) The members of the Appeal Panel shall be provided with copies of the official record of the case,
including the full report of the reconciler, the Hearing
Panel minutes, the written decision and all documentary evidence considered by the Hearing Panel, and
the written memorandum stating the basis for the
appeal. The panel shall make its decision solely on
the basis of the materials received.
(c) The only decision to be made by the Appeal Panel
shall be whether to approve reconsideration of the
Hearing Panel decision. The panel shall not approve
a request for a new hearing on the basis of newly discovered evidence unless such evidence was clearly
not available to the Hearing Panel and was not the
fault of the party requesting the reopening of the case,
and unless it is clear that the absence of such evidence
resulted in a gross miscarriage of justice.
(d) The standards of review that shall define the
Appeal Panel’s considerations shall be limited to three
basic areas:
(1) Factual findings: The Appeal Panel shall
review factual findings of the Hearing Panel only
to determine if they are supported by evidence.
The Appeal Panel shall not ordinarily sit in judgment of the Hearing Panel’s conclusions regarding
evidence, since the Hearing Panel was in the best
position to judge factual issues. The Appeal Panel
must be convinced that a mistake has been committed, that is, that the evidence is such that
reasonable minds could not agree with the Hearing Panel’s decision.
(2) Conclusions on authority: The Appeal Panel
may approve an appeal if the Hearing Panel was
clearly outside its authority, e.g., a decision was
made that the panel had no authority to make
186
|
2 0 1 3 C o n v e n t io n P r o c e e d i n g s
under the Constitution and Bylaws of the Synod,
or a decision was made on an issue not related
to the sole issue to be decided, or a decision was
made on a theological question that the panel had
no authority to make.
(3) Discretionary acts: The Appeal Panel may
approve an appeal if there was a clear abuse of
discretion impacting the decision of the Hearing
Panel, resulting in a gross miscarriage of justice,
or that involves an obvious and inappropriate bias
or prejudice.
(de) If the Appeal Panel denies the request for reconsideration of the decision of the Hearing Panel and
upholds the suspension of the ecclesiastical supervisor, the decision of the Hearing Panel shall be
regarded as final and shall
(1) be binding upon the parties and not be subject
to further appeal;
(2) have no precedential value;
(3) be carried out by the district president or the
President of the Synod; and
(4) shall be publicized as deemed appropriate
under the circumstances by the district president
or the President of the Synod.
(ef) If the Appeal Panel grants the request for reconsideration of the decision of the Hearing Panel, a
Final Hearing Panel shall be selected by the Secretary of the Synod.
Final Hearing Panel
2.14.98.1 Within 30 days after the receipt of the decision of the
Appeal Panel granting the request for reconsideration of the decision of the Hearing Panelthe request,
a Final Hearing Panel shall be selected.
(a) The panel shall be constituted in the same prescribed
manner as described in Bylaws 2.14.7.2–2.14.7.6, except
that the two district presidents, the reconciler, the hearing facilitator that provided assistance to the Hearing
Panel, and the involved district presidents are omitted
from consideration for the Final Hearing Panel.
(b) The procedures for the final hearing shall be the
same as prescribed in Bylaws 2.14.7.6–2.14.7.8.
(c) The chairman of the Hearing Panel shall provide
the Final Hearing Panel with a written statement of
the matter and the Hearing Panel’s report, minutes,
records, and proceedings.
2.14.9.18.2 Upon completion of the hearing by the Final Hearing
Panel… [same as current wording of 2.14.8.2]
[Current Bylaws 2.14.9–2.14.9.3 will be renumbered 2.14.10–
2.14.10.3.]
R e s olu t i on s