Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2013 · 65th Convention, St. Louis › Page 186

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 2013, Page 186

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

opinion received from either the CCM or the CTCR.
(b) Such request for a final hearing shall be submitted
to the Secretary of the Synod with copies provided
supplied to the district president(s) of the accuser and
the accused, the chairman of the Hearing Panel, the
accuser, and the President of the Synod, and shall be
accompanied by a written memorandum stating the
basis for the request.
(a) Within 30 days after receipt of an appeal from the
accused, an Appeal Panel shall be selected by the Secretary of the Synod. The Appeal Panel shall be made
up of three district presidents who shall be trained
for such service.
(1) One district president shall be selected by the
accused, one by the ecclesiastical supervisor of the
accused, and the third by the two Appeal Panel
members so selected.
(2) If the two Appeal Panel members cannot agree
on a third panel member, the Secretary of the
Synod shall select the third member by blind draw
from the remaining eligible district presidents.
(b) The members of the Appeal Panel shall be provided with copies of the official record of the case,
including the full report of the reconciler, the Hearing
Panel minutes, the written decision and all documentary evidence considered by the Hearing Panel, and
the written memorandum stating the basis for the
appeal. The panel shall make its decision solely on
the basis of the materials received.
(c) The only decision to be made by the Appeal Panel
shall be whether to approve reconsideration of the
Hearing Panel decision. The panel shall not approve
a request for a new hearing on the basis of newly discovered evidence unless such evidence was clearly
not available to the Hearing Panel and was not the
fault of the party requesting the reopening of the case,
and unless it is clear that the absence of such evidence
resulted in a gross miscarriage of justice.
(d) The standards of review that shall define the
Appeal Panel’s considerations shall be limited to three
basic areas:
(1) Factual findings: The Appeal Panel shall
review factual findings of the Hearing Panel only
to determine if they are supported by evidence.
The Appeal Panel shall not ordinarily sit in judgment of the Hearing Panel’s conclusions regarding
evidence, since the Hearing Panel was in the best
position to judge factual issues. The Appeal Panel
must be convinced that a mistake has been committed, that is, that the evidence is such that
reasonable minds could not agree with the Hearing Panel’s decision.
(2) Conclusions on authority: The Appeal Panel
may approve an appeal if the Hearing Panel was
clearly outside its authority, e.g., a decision was
made that the panel had no authority to make
186

|

2 0 1 3 C o n v e n t io n P r o c e e d i n g s

under the Constitution and Bylaws of the Synod,
or a decision was made on an issue not related
to the sole issue to be decided, or a decision was
made on a theological question that the panel had
no authority to make.
(3) Discretionary acts: The Appeal Panel may
approve an appeal if there was a clear abuse of
discretion impacting the decision of the Hearing
Panel, resulting in a gross miscarriage of justice,
or that involves an obvious and inappropriate bias
or prejudice.
(de) If the Appeal Panel denies the request for reconsideration of the decision of the Hearing Panel and
upholds the suspension of the ecclesiastical supervisor, the decision of the Hearing Panel shall be
regarded as final and shall
(1) be binding upon the parties and not be subject
to further appeal;
(2) have no precedential value;
(3) be carried out by the district president or the
President of the Synod; and
(4) shall be publicized as deemed appropriate
under the circumstances by the district president
or the President of the Synod.
(ef) If the Appeal Panel grants the request for reconsideration of the decision of the Hearing Panel, a
Final Hearing Panel shall be selected by the Secretary of the Synod.
Final Hearing Panel
2.14.98.1 Within 30 days after the receipt of the decision of the
Appeal Panel granting the request for reconsideration of the decision of the Hearing Panelthe request,
a Final Hearing Panel shall be selected.
(a) The panel shall be constituted in the same prescribed
manner as described in Bylaws 2.14.7.2–2.14.7.6, except
that the two district presidents, the reconciler, the hearing facilitator that provided assistance to the Hearing
Panel, and the involved district presidents are omitted
from consideration for the Final Hearing Panel.
(b) The procedures for the final hearing shall be the
same as prescribed in Bylaws 2.14.7.6–2.14.7.8.
(c) The chairman of the Hearing Panel shall provide
the Final Hearing Panel with a written statement of
the matter and the Hearing Panel’s report, minutes,
records, and proceedings.
2.14.9.18.2 Upon completion of the hearing by the Final Hearing
Panel… [same as current wording of 2.14.8.2]
[Current Bylaws 2.14.9–2.14.9.3 will be renumbered 2.14.10–
2.14.10.3.]

R e s olu t i on s