Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2013 · 65th Convention, St. Louis › Page 145
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 2013, Page 145
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
a pre-convention issue of an official periodical of the
Synod and in the Convention Workbook.
(c) The committee’s report shall list the qualifications
of various positions used in the solicitation of candidates and contain pertinent information concerning
each candidate, such as occupation or profession; district affiliation; residence; specific experience; number
of years as a member of an LCMS congregation; present position; offices previously held in a congregation,
district or the Synod; qualifications for the office in
question; and, if the candidate so desires, also a brief
personal statement.
3.12.3.7 The chairman of the Committee for Convention Nominations shall submit the committee’s report in person
to the convention at one of its earliest sessions.
(a) The convention may amend the slate by nominations from the floor.
(b) Floor nominations shall be brought individually
before the convention for approval before being added
to the ballot. No floor nominations shall be accepted
which would preclude, by virtue of election limitations
of such office, election of any pending nominee already
on the slate of candidates received from the Committee for Convention Nominations without disclosing
such potential effect immediately to the convention.
(c) Such floor nominations may only be made from
the list of names which have previously been offered
to the Committee for Convention Nominations prior
to the final deadline for the submission of nominations, unless the convention shall otherwise order by
a simple majority vote. The president of the Concordia
University System (or a designee) and the Secretary of
the Synod (or a designee) shall verify all floor nominees to serve as a member of a Concordia University
System board of regents possess qualifications as stated
in Bylaw 3.10.5.2.7. The Chief Administrative Officer
of the Synod (or a designee) and the Secretary of the
Synod (or a designee) shall review and verify that all
floor nominees to serve as a member of the Concordia
University System Board of Directors possess qualifications as stated in Bylaw 3.6.6.3.
(d) If the convention approves the receipt of such
additional nominations, any delegate making such a
nomination shall have secured prior written consent
of the candidate being nominated and shall immediately submit it to the chairman of the Committee for
Convention Nominations, along with required pertinent information concerning the nominee as detailed
in Bylaw 3.12.3.6 (c).
(e) Whenever possible, chairman of the Committee
for Convention Nominations shall have on hand at the
convention a reserve list of nominees, approved by the
committee, for use if required.
(f) Whenever possible, the Committee for Convention Nominations should be informed in advance if
any new board or commission is likely to be established
R e s olu t i on s
at a convention of the Synod, so that it may have a slate
of candidates in readiness.
3.12.3.8 The Committee for Convention Nominations, in consultation with officials of the Synod, shall maintain a
description of the desirable expertise required for each
elected position and shall transmit this information
together with suggestions for improvement of procedures to the next committee through the Secretary of
the Synod.
Action: Adopted (8)
(After discussion, Res. 5-05B was adopted as presented [Yes:
878; No: 81].)
To Revise Bylaw 3.10.5.6 re College
and University Faculties
RESOLUTION 5-06A
Overture 5-10–5-11 (CW, p. 192)
Rationale
The boards of regents are responsible for faculty matters. Much
of what is specified in the Bylaws no longer is relevant at the Synod
level and needs to be removed so that the regents can govern more
effectively.
1. The regional accreditation commissions require that institutions have the authority to set policies governing the
faculty and academic matters. All of the institutions have
faculty and academic policy manuals in place.
2. The level of detail in this section does not serve any useful
purpose. In fact, due to differing institutional terminology
and procedures, it is confusing.
3. Faculty employment matters are governed by state laws,
and are best handled by a board of regents in consultation
with its own legal counsel.
4. If a faculty member takes legal action against a college or
university, the Synod is exposed to potential legal action
because the LCMS Handbook dictates the details of faculty
policies.
Therefore be it
Resolved, That the Concordia University System maintain in its
policies a list of subject matters that each institution will address in
its own faculty policies, and that each college and university board
of regents ensure that its institutional handbooks set appropriate
policies regarding faculty matters; and be it further
Resolved, That Bylaw 3.10.5.6 be amended as follows:
PRESENT/PROPOSED WORDING
College and University Faculties
3.10.5.6 The faculty of each college or university of the Synod
shall consist of the president, the full-time faculty, and
the part-time faculty.
2 0 1 3 C o n v e n t io n P r o c e e d i n g s
|
145