Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2013 · 65th Convention, St. Louis › Page 145

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 2013, Page 145

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

a pre-convention issue of an official periodical of the
Synod and in the Convention Workbook.
(c) The committee’s report shall list the qualifications
of various positions used in the solicitation of candidates and contain pertinent information concerning
each candidate, such as occupation or profession; district affiliation; residence; specific experience; number
of years as a member of an LCMS congregation; present position; offices previously held in a congregation,
district or the Synod; qualifications for the office in
question; and, if the candidate so desires, also a brief
personal statement.
3.12.3.7 The chairman of the Committee for Convention Nominations shall submit the committee’s report in person
to the convention at one of its earliest sessions.
(a) The convention may amend the slate by nominations from the floor.
(b) Floor nominations shall be brought individually
before the convention for approval before being added
to the ballot. No floor nominations shall be accepted
which would preclude, by virtue of election limitations
of such office, election of any pending nominee already
on the slate of candidates received from the Committee for Convention Nominations without disclosing
such potential effect immediately to the convention.
(c) Such floor nominations may only be made from
the list of names which have previously been offered
to the Committee for Convention Nominations prior
to the final deadline for the submission of nominations, unless the convention shall otherwise order by
a simple majority vote. The president of the Concordia
University System (or a designee) and the Secretary of
the Synod (or a designee) shall verify all floor nominees to serve as a member of a Concordia University
System board of regents possess qualifications as stated
in Bylaw 3.10.5.2.7. The Chief Administrative Officer
of the Synod (or a designee) and the Secretary of the
Synod (or a designee) shall review and verify that all
floor nominees to serve as a member of the Concordia
University System Board of Directors possess qualifications as stated in Bylaw 3.6.6.3.
(d) If the convention approves the receipt of such
additional nominations, any delegate making such a
nomination shall have secured prior written consent
of the candidate being nominated and shall immediately submit it to the chairman of the Committee for
Convention Nominations, along with required pertinent information concerning the nominee as detailed
in Bylaw 3.12.3.6 (c).
(e) Whenever possible, chairman of the Committee
for Convention Nominations shall have on hand at the
convention a reserve list of nominees, approved by the
committee, for use if required.
(f) Whenever possible, the Committee for Convention Nominations should be informed in advance if
any new board or commission is likely to be established
R e s olu t i on s

at a convention of the Synod, so that it may have a slate
of candidates in readiness.
3.12.3.8 The Committee for Convention Nominations, in consultation with officials of the Synod, shall maintain a
description of the desirable expertise required for each
elected position and shall transmit this information
together with suggestions for improvement of procedures to the next committee through the Secretary of
the Synod.
Action: Adopted (8)
(After discussion, Res. 5-05B was adopted as presented [Yes:
878; No: 81].)

To Revise Bylaw 3.10.5.6 re College
and University Faculties
RESOLUTION 5-06A
Overture 5-10–5-11 (CW, p. 192)
Rationale
The boards of regents are responsible for faculty matters. Much
of what is specified in the Bylaws no longer is relevant at the Synod
level and needs to be removed so that the regents can govern more
effectively.
1. The regional accreditation commissions require that institutions have the authority to set policies governing the
faculty and academic matters. All of the institutions have
faculty and academic policy manuals in place.
2. The level of detail in this section does not serve any useful
purpose. In fact, due to differing institutional terminology
and procedures, it is confusing.
3. Faculty employment matters are governed by state laws,
and are best handled by a board of regents in consultation
with its own legal counsel.
4.	If a faculty member takes legal action against a college or
university, the Synod is exposed to potential legal action
because the LCMS Handbook dictates the details of faculty
policies.
Therefore be it
Resolved, That the Concordia University System maintain in its
policies a list of subject matters that each institution will address in
its own faculty policies, and that each college and university board
of regents ensure that its institutional handbooks set appropriate
policies regarding faculty matters; and be it further
Resolved, That Bylaw 3.10.5.6 be amended as follows:
PRESENT/PROPOSED WORDING
College and University Faculties
3.10.5.6 The faculty of each college or university of the Synod
shall consist of the president, the full-time faculty, and
the part-time faculty.
2 0 1 3 C o n v e n t io n P r o c e e d i n g s

|

145