Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2013 · 65th Convention, St. Louis › Page 152

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 2013, Page 152

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

Resolved, That each congregation be urged to
• provide support for her pastor’s continuing education in
appropriate ways (e.g., non-vacation time off for continuing
education, financial support as feasible, etc.)
• give heed to 2007 Res. 6-08, “To Encourage Congregations to
Provide Professional Church Worker Sabbaticals,” by offering a sabbatical leave to her pastor as feasible.
Action: Adopted (8)
(Following debate, Res. 5-08B was adopted as presented [Yes:
892; No: 110].)

To Revise Bylaw 3.10.5.5.2 re Election Process
for College and University Presidents
RESOLUTION 5-09
Overture 5-08 (CW, p. 191)
Rationale
The current bylaw regarding the process for electing the president of a CUS institution lacks two features that would promote a
smoother process.
1. If there were a meeting at the beginning of the process to
compare the expectations of the parties involved in the
election, this would provide an opportunity to create mutual understanding and reduce mismatched expectations
later in the process.
2. If the President of the CUS participates as a guest in the
election event it provides an opportunity to understand
the strengths and needs of the candidates, and it creates a
relationship with the president-elect. If questions arise the
President of the CUS may be able to provide assistance.
Therefore be it
Resolved, That Bylaw 3.10.5.5.2 be amended to read as
follows:
PRESENT/PROPOSED WORDING
3.10.5.5.2
The following process shall govern the selection
of a college/university president.
(a) When a vacancy or an impending vacancy in the
office of president is known, the board of regents shall
inform the campus constituencies, the Board of Directors of Concordia University System, the President of
the Synod, an official periodical of the Synod, and
other parties as appropriate.
(1) The board of regents shall request that the
Board of Directors of Concordia University System authorize the institution to publish a request
for nominations for the position of president.
(2) The board of regents shall request that the
Board of Directors of Concordia University System schedule a transition review of the campus.
152

|

2 0 1 3 C o n v e n t io n P r o c e e d i n g s

The review is to provide a report on the state of
the campus for use by the search committee, the
board of regents, and the candidates.
(b) The board of regents shall oversee the process of
defining the institution’s needs, describing the desired
characteristics of the new president, and issuing a
request for nominations.
(1) A search committee shall be formed that represents the board of regents, the faculty, and the
staff. Faculty members and staff members on the
committee shall be members of LCMS congregations.
(2) The search committee shall prepare a description of the needs of the institution based on
listening forums, the findings of the Board of
Directors of Concordia University System’s transition review, and other relevant information.
Before publishing a call for nominations, the President of the Concordia University System shall
convene an in-person conference involving the
board of regents, the search committee, and the
prior approval panel to discuss the qualifications
that will be sought and the search criteria.
(3) The search committee shall develop written
criteria that will be utilized by the committee to
screen the candidates and will be utilized by the
board of regents to guide the presidential election.
(4) A person designated by the board of regents
shall act as its agent to issue a request for the
nomination of candidates for the presidency of
the institution. The request for nominations shall
be submitted to the parties who are authorized
to nominate. Candidates may be nominated by
congregations of the Synod, the Board of Directors of Concordia University System, the board
of regents, and the faculty of the institution. The
request for nominations shall state when the nominating period closes.
(5) After the nomination period has closed, the
agent of the board of regents shall distribute via an
announcement to the congregations of the Synod
the list of names of nominees who have consented
to nomination. The announcement shall contain
contact information to submit correspondence
regarding the nominees and provide a reasonable
deadline for receiving correspondence. The board
of regents shall establish a procedure for processing correspondence regarding nominees.
(c) The board of regents shall utilize the work of the
search committee to establish a short list of candidates.
(1) The search committee will provide a report to
the board of regents regarding the qualifications
of the candidates with its observations and recommendations.

R e s olu t i on s