Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2013 · 65th Convention, St. Louis › Page 152
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 2013, Page 152
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
Resolved, That each congregation be urged to
• provide support for her pastor’s continuing education in
appropriate ways (e.g., non-vacation time off for continuing
education, financial support as feasible, etc.)
• give heed to 2007 Res. 6-08, “To Encourage Congregations to
Provide Professional Church Worker Sabbaticals,” by offering a sabbatical leave to her pastor as feasible.
Action: Adopted (8)
(Following debate, Res. 5-08B was adopted as presented [Yes:
892; No: 110].)
To Revise Bylaw 3.10.5.5.2 re Election Process
for College and University Presidents
RESOLUTION 5-09
Overture 5-08 (CW, p. 191)
Rationale
The current bylaw regarding the process for electing the president of a CUS institution lacks two features that would promote a
smoother process.
1. If there were a meeting at the beginning of the process to
compare the expectations of the parties involved in the
election, this would provide an opportunity to create mutual understanding and reduce mismatched expectations
later in the process.
2. If the President of the CUS participates as a guest in the
election event it provides an opportunity to understand
the strengths and needs of the candidates, and it creates a
relationship with the president-elect. If questions arise the
President of the CUS may be able to provide assistance.
Therefore be it
Resolved, That Bylaw 3.10.5.5.2 be amended to read as
follows:
PRESENT/PROPOSED WORDING
3.10.5.5.2
The following process shall govern the selection
of a college/university president.
(a) When a vacancy or an impending vacancy in the
office of president is known, the board of regents shall
inform the campus constituencies, the Board of Directors of Concordia University System, the President of
the Synod, an official periodical of the Synod, and
other parties as appropriate.
(1) The board of regents shall request that the
Board of Directors of Concordia University System authorize the institution to publish a request
for nominations for the position of president.
(2) The board of regents shall request that the
Board of Directors of Concordia University System schedule a transition review of the campus.
152
|
2 0 1 3 C o n v e n t io n P r o c e e d i n g s
The review is to provide a report on the state of
the campus for use by the search committee, the
board of regents, and the candidates.
(b) The board of regents shall oversee the process of
defining the institution’s needs, describing the desired
characteristics of the new president, and issuing a
request for nominations.
(1) A search committee shall be formed that represents the board of regents, the faculty, and the
staff. Faculty members and staff members on the
committee shall be members of LCMS congregations.
(2) The search committee shall prepare a description of the needs of the institution based on
listening forums, the findings of the Board of
Directors of Concordia University System’s transition review, and other relevant information.
Before publishing a call for nominations, the President of the Concordia University System shall
convene an in-person conference involving the
board of regents, the search committee, and the
prior approval panel to discuss the qualifications
that will be sought and the search criteria.
(3) The search committee shall develop written
criteria that will be utilized by the committee to
screen the candidates and will be utilized by the
board of regents to guide the presidential election.
(4) A person designated by the board of regents
shall act as its agent to issue a request for the
nomination of candidates for the presidency of
the institution. The request for nominations shall
be submitted to the parties who are authorized
to nominate. Candidates may be nominated by
congregations of the Synod, the Board of Directors of Concordia University System, the board
of regents, and the faculty of the institution. The
request for nominations shall state when the nominating period closes.
(5) After the nomination period has closed, the
agent of the board of regents shall distribute via an
announcement to the congregations of the Synod
the list of names of nominees who have consented
to nomination. The announcement shall contain
contact information to submit correspondence
regarding the nominees and provide a reasonable
deadline for receiving correspondence. The board
of regents shall establish a procedure for processing correspondence regarding nominees.
(c) The board of regents shall utilize the work of the
search committee to establish a short list of candidates.
(1) The search committee will provide a report to
the board of regents regarding the qualifications
of the candidates with its observations and recommendations.
R e s olu t i on s